Started By
Message
re: Someone help me understand why Lane is willing to burn it all down for a TE
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:34 pm to this board
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:34 pm to this board
quote:
So then show me where I actually said any of the bullshite you made up.
Careful what you wish for, dumbass.
SidewalkTiger asking you twice for context. You just say "money", a vague answer. He asked for context, then you make fun of him for asking you to provide context.
Him asking you 2 more times, and you responded by making fun of him and provide no context.
Me asking you what you are talking about and providing an example of what you may be implying. You respond the same way.
Then you have the audacity to say this:
quote:
Maybe next time try attempting to read for the sake of context
You are absolutely as retarded as you think everyone else is.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 12:39 pm
2
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:35 pm to SUB
quote:
You are absolutely as retarded as you think everyone else is.
That's usually how it works.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:38 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Someone help me understand why Lane is willing to burn it all down for a TE
You've fallen for the narrative. Be smarter.
LSU, like all schools, will add players that can help that are ruled eligible. It's been going on for the last couple of years. That you are just starting to pay attention to doesn't change anything.
LSU is at the forefront of this specific example because a couple of players in the class are former LSU players or former Ole Miss players...and as a result, Kiffin has the inside track.
Lets be honest. LSU and Kiffin are scaring a lot of schools and fans in the SEC.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:41 pm to Hester Carries
quote:
Its not "completely out the of the realm of possibility" that a recruit might be a compulsive liar. Or that he is suffering from schizophrenia and imagined it.
Living in the extreme a bit now are we?
quote:
Were you under the impression that we just didnt consider possibilities and thought there was only 1 possible explanation? Rather than just applying occam's razor to this scenario and coming away with "Yeah OM probably tried to get their old player back"? And this is the guy calling us dumb? Dunning-Kruger like ya read about.
All of these LSU tears just because someone answered the question about what benefit a player would have if he lied about holding offers.
It’s almost like you, as a fan base, are beyond broken.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:44 pm to SUB
quote:
SidewalkTiger asking you twice for context. You just say "money",
It’s all of the context that is needed. It was a simple question that he asked. He got a simple answer. It was you broken idiots who then tried to overcomplicate it.
Once again. Simple question. Simple answer.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:46 pm to this board
quote:
It’s all of the context that is needed. It was a simple question that he asked. He got a simple answer. It was you broken idiots who then tried to overcomplicate it.
Once again. Simple question. Simple answer.
It's everyone else's fault.
We get it.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:47 pm to NFLSU
quote:
“Only Lane and LSU are doing this!!!”
Lol
and even if it was, who cares. Death, taxes and college football coaches bending the rules.
Just win
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:48 pm to SidewalkTiger
Are you going to cry more about it?
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:50 pm to this board
quote:
It’s all of the context that is needed. It was a simple question that he asked. He got a simple answer. It was you broken idiots who then tried to overcomplicate it.
Once again. Simple question. Simple answer.
Ok, Simple Jack. Obviously, some disagree with you. At the end of the day, you were asked for context multiple times, you refused to give it multiple times, forcing others to assume what you meant, then you bitched about others "not reading for context." You can't have it both ways.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:51 pm to this board
quote:
Are you going to cry more about it?
I think you and several others already have this place waterlogged enough.
Doubt it can handle much more.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:53 pm to SUB
quote:
Obviously, some disagree with you.
You disagree that a benefit to a recruit lying about offers is more money?
That’s pretty wild.
quote:
At the end of the day, you were asked for context multiple times, you refused to give it multiple times,
No more context was needed. Do you need a damned thesis for what is an incredible simple question? This isn’t quantum mechanics we’re discussing.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:54 pm to SidewalkTiger
“I know you are but what am I” is just an incredibly fantastic response to go with.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:55 pm to this board
quote:
You disagree that a benefit to a recruit lying about offers is more money?
That’s pretty wild.
No, I disagree that your simple answer of "Money" can only mean one thing and motivation to lie about money should also be considered if you are going to make that claim. See, that is providing context. Try it.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:56 pm to this board
quote:
“I know you are but what am I” is just an incredibly fantastic response to go with.
Stop getting so riled up, this is all in fun.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:59 pm to this board
quote:
No more context was needed. Do you need a damned thesis for what is an incredible simple question? This isn’t quantum mechanics we’re discussing.
Wrong. The timing of him telling that "lie" does matter, which is why you were asked why would he do that if he already had committed to LSU at that point? And especially with the baggage, what more does he have to gain by lying about other offers? You were asked these questions and you laughed them off, calling people dumb, forcing them to make assumptions because you can't defend your own argument.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:06 pm to SUB
quote:
motivation to lie about money should also be considered if you are going to make that claim.
Quite literally spelled this out multiple times.
Look, I’m sorry that you thought this was something far more than it was and that I robbed you of your dopamine boost from trying to make an argument over something that never was.
A simple question requires a simple answer but unfortunately that isn’t enough for someone with a simple mind. It isn’t my fault that the answer wasn’t enough for your liking. It’s your fault that you spewed vomit and diarrhea all over this thread over a simple question and simple answer.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:07 pm to SUB
quote:
Wrong
Man you’re an entitled little fella, aren’t you?
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:09 pm to SUB
quote:
Wrong. The timing of him telling that "lie" does matter, which is why you were asked why would he do that if he already had committed to LSU at that point? And especially with the baggage, what more does he have to gain by lying about other offers? You were asked these questions and you laughed them off, calling people dumb, forcing them to make assumptions because you can't defend your own argument.
This dude has been in his feelings for 3 days over the bad LSU man. He's delusional.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:17 pm to this board
quote:
Man you’re an entitled little fella, aren’t you?
Says the retard who demands everyone to read his mind.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:23 pm to SUB
quote:
Says the retard who demands everyone to read his mind.
You keep making up these wild arguments and accusations. All that I told you was to read the words that I posted. You just cannot seem to do that.
Just like how you claim that I never gave any more context to my response of “money” even though i absolutely did. No more context was needed…..but I even still gave more context. No mind reading is necessary. The only requirement is just a hint of common sense and logical thought.
But you need things spoon fed to you or else you’re going to attempt to fabricate some wild argument in hopes that you can grab a “gotcha”. Sorry that I denied you that moment.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News