Started By
Message
re: SECe Schools Excluding UGA, Would You Support Auburn to the East
Posted on 1/25/16 at 3:06 pm to higgs_boson
Posted on 1/25/16 at 3:06 pm to higgs_boson
I've been firmly on the 9 game bandwagon sing the Jacksonville State debacle. Would rather lose/struggle against respectable opponents
Although, JSU and Memphis ended up being our best wins of the season
Although, JSU and Memphis ended up being our best wins of the season
0
Posted on 1/25/16 at 3:25 pm to undecided
quote:
We know that UGA is threatened by the possibility of Auburn to the SECe.
Are you kidding? In the last 10 years we own you. Florida is 6-4 over the last 10 years. Come on over, Aubbie! You might never win an East championship!
quote:
moving Auburn East to make their division more respectable and competitive.
You might want to pick LSU or Alabama if the goal is to make the East more respectable. Not sure Auburn is going to do it.
Sounds more like you are running from Alabama more than trying to improve the East, though.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 1/25/16 at 3:30 pm to jb4
quote:
Missouri probably wants to be in the east
I would imagine Arkansas does, too.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 3:36 pm to DawgsLife
UGA screaming about "owning" Auburn when they haven't won an NC since Herschel had one personality is really cute
Posted on 1/25/16 at 3:36 pm to undecided
quote:
since Herschel had one personality
Posted on 1/25/16 at 4:04 pm to undecided
quote:
UGA screaming about "owning" Auburn when they haven't won an NC since Herschel had one personality is really cute
Nobody screaming. Just find it odd that you are ALMOST 50/50 against Alabama, and want to move to the East where you can't beat two of the teams. Nobody sad Auburn people were smart, though. How are you going to win the East if you can't beat Georgia or Florida?
If you are scared of Alabama just say so. there are a lot of little brothers scared of their big brother.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 1/25/16 at 4:06 pm to undecided
quote:
We know that UGA is threatened by the possibility of Auburn to the SECe.
I am curious, though. Why would we be threatened about Auburn coming to the East?
ETA:
In the last 10 years, Florida has as many SEC Championships as Auburn. You might want to stay in the West. Eventually Alabama will fall.
This post was edited on 1/25/16 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 1/25/16 at 4:37 pm to undecided
No, I like Mizzou in the East with us. If we ever go to 16 schools in the conference, particularly if we take in east coast teams, then Mizzou to the West would make sense.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 4:51 pm to undecided
I feel like Auburn belongs in the East.
It was always the intent for Auburn to continue to play UF and UGA on a regular basis, if the conference knew then what it does now, not sure Auburn wouldn't have been in the East from the beginning. UF and UGA have very little history with Tennessee.
It was always the intent for Auburn to continue to play UF and UGA on a regular basis, if the conference knew then what it does now, not sure Auburn wouldn't have been in the East from the beginning. UF and UGA have very little history with Tennessee.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 4:55 pm to Carolina_Girl
quote:
Seeing as how we haven't beaten Auburn since 1933...hell to the no
We have not played but 9 or 10 games since 1992. I think we've not played one USC team that won 10 games or more.
We have a losing record to Vanderbilt. Moving to the east might allow us to catch the Dores.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 5:06 pm to undecided
In my world auburn is in the east and there are no permanent opponents.
Lsu's 2016 schedule in my world.
Wisconsin
Jacksonville
State
Bye week
Missouri
Bye week
Southern miss
Ole miss
Bye week
Alabama
Arkansas
South Alabama
Texas a m
Lsu's 2016 schedule in my world.
Wisconsin
Jacksonville
State
Bye week
Missouri
Bye week
Southern miss
Ole miss
Bye week
Alabama
Arkansas
South Alabama
Texas a m
Posted on 1/25/16 at 5:08 pm to undecided
Yes. Even if we can't beat them, I'd still like to play them in Williams-Brice every other year and have the opportunity to travel to Auburn every other year.
Missouri just isn't that exciting of a home game to me, and I don't have any plans to go to a game in COMO anytime soon.
Missouri just isn't that exciting of a home game to me, and I don't have any plans to go to a game in COMO anytime soon.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 5:12 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:And yet you just fired the only HC since Wally Butts with a winning record against us.
We have owned y'all for almost the past 20 years now
Posted on 1/25/16 at 5:17 pm to rockytop627
quote:.
This would likely frick up TSIO, so in that case no.
Wait, Tennessee fans want this bloodbath to continue?
Posted on 1/25/16 at 5:20 pm to 1935 MBB Champions
Meh, I guess. Wouldnt seem natural for awhile after all these years, but I don't really oppose it. Id prefer we just add two schools from the states of Virginia and North Carolina to the East. I'm tired of us taking Big 12 castoffs. They are not geographically or culturally a fit.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 5:22 pm to undecided
Hell yes
Posted on 1/25/16 at 5:32 pm to undecided
Competitive unbalance by choice? Makes no sense.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 5:36 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
And yet you just fired the only HC since Wally Butts with a winning record against us.
Yep. But it is the team and not the coach. It won't change.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 5:43 pm to undecided
Not enough information to answer the question. Several variable I would want to know before giving an opinion (I'm assuming that Missouri goes West):
1. Are we maintaining an 8 game schedule?
2. Are we keeping permanent cross division rivals?
3. If yes to 2, who are the cross divisional opponents for Bama, Tennessee, Auburn, and Missouri?
Without knowing the answers to those questions, I don't think I can really form a firm opinion. I'd sort of like to keep Auburn on A&M's schedule, but if it was better for the league, I wouldn't complain.
1. Are we maintaining an 8 game schedule?
2. Are we keeping permanent cross division rivals?
3. If yes to 2, who are the cross divisional opponents for Bama, Tennessee, Auburn, and Missouri?
Without knowing the answers to those questions, I don't think I can really form a firm opinion. I'd sort of like to keep Auburn on A&M's schedule, but if it was better for the league, I wouldn't complain.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 7:14 pm to twk
I am all for it. The current configuration means someone has to go east. He'll send Bama I am tired of them kicking our arse
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News