quote:
Actually this is good for college football. It will spur the SEC and Big 10 to support the save college sports act, which we need to get real fixes done.

I thought I read that both had gotten on board, but I only read a headline and not the article to find out what changed - them or the bill.

EDIT: I found another article. Looks like the SEC and the Big 10 got some changes including doubling the shared revenue cap to then have limits/controls on 3rd party NIL deals with conference or school partners. But this was also back in late July, and of course the Senate and Thune went on recess without doing anything.

This post was edited on 8/30/26 at 11:59 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Tigerdew

The Garden District of Da' Parish

Member since Dec 2003

15695 posts

Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:33 am to Goldingera

quote:
Subpoena ad testificandum: Requires a non-party to attend and give testimony at a deposition, hearing, or trial.

fricking retard coonasses

Louisiana rules of civ pro- “ A witness, whether a party or not, who resides or is employed in this state may be subpoenaed to attend a trial or hearing wherever held in this state.”

There are 42 players/plantiffs involved in the lawsuit against the NCAA. There are multiple injunctions from around the country where no school was subpoenaed by the NCAA. Why the frick would this one be treated differently? Are you losers really going to push the whole “Kiffin made them do it” bullshite?