re: SEC is considering restoring a transfer policy for intraconference transfers

quote:

---

You didnt comprehend the decision.
The NCAA cannot implement the rule because the courts deem them to be a monopoly. Which is stupid. An organization can't set rules for voluntary participation?

However, that same verdict is the exact reason why the SEC can implement the rule.
The SEC is a 16 team organization. There are about 120 other D1 schools outside the SEC.
By definition, it is not a monopoly.
If you aren't a monopoly, then it isn't an antitrust violation.

---

Wrong. The NCAA nor the SEC has an antitrust exemption. That's why the NCAA lost & NIL & Revenue Sharing came about. In order for the NCAA, SEC or any conference to receive antitrust exemption, athletes would officially have to be labeled as employees, an union formed along with a CBA being agreed upon.

quote:

---

Not if it’s a conference rule. The SEC and NCAA are private organizations and can decide their own rules.

---

quote:

---

Lol thank god lsu doesnt have anyone on the board the last decade. Cant pin this on us. This is some of yalls fault. Reign in these retards from your schools

---

Our top receiver and now top LB all came from an SEC school

quote:

---

If you aren't a monopoly, you are not subject to antitrust laws.

---

Then explain to me why the NCAA had to remove the rule of having sit out a year in the first place?

What ever rules are made for the athletes, it should apply to coaches too.

quote:

---

quote:
If you aren't a monopoly, you are not subject to antitrust laws.


Then explain to me why the NCAA had to remove the rule of having sit out a year in the first place?

---

The NCAA has a monopoly on playing college football.

The SEC does not. There are 3 other P4 conferences. There are 5 other G5 conferences with NIL and scholarships.

I dont see why you are struggling to see the difference between an association that regulates every conference and 1 singular conference. Particularly as it relates to monopoly regulations.

quote:

---

The NCAA has a monopoly on playing college football.

The SEC does not. 

---

The SEC controls the Grant of Rights to each member institution. Not the NCAA which means the SEC is the organization that receives revenue from television deals. The SEC & it's member institutions are an extension of the NCAA.

quote:

---

There are 3 other P4 conferences. There are 5 other G5 conferences with NIL and scholarships.

---

quote:

---

There are 3 other P4 conferences. There are 5 other G5 conferences with NIL and scholarships.

---

Are the conferences including the SEC not required by federal to now pay student athletes revenue sharing checks?

quote:

---

Can’t be the only conference to do it.

---

Won’t matter if it is or it ain’t the courts will just you can’t limit where a student athlete transfers and it’ll be what it is. All anyone has to know about college athletics is that Texas Tech seriously intended to have a degenerate gambler on their roster. There is nothing that is off the table OTHER than the programs or conferences not having the ability to regulate anything. We are just a few seasons away from someone telling a conference they ain’t playing the schedule the conference sets….nothing is unthinkable after watching TT seriously playing a degenerate gambler and multiple programs in multiple sports having or intending to have players who have had more than a mild flirtation with a pro league on their roster.

If SEC had a competent leader, this could be a step to resorting some sort of common sense to NCAA rules are have completely fallen off the rails.

But we have a moron as commissioner, so this will just add to the current lunacy.

Sankey may really be a Manchurian candidate sent to destroy the conf.