Started By
Message
re: SEC bans pro football and basketball players from returning. A big FU to LSU from the SEC
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:14 pm to houstonearler
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:14 pm to houstonearler
The 5/5 ruling should not have counted against the 2022 class. All of this crap would be moot if those idiots got it correct. They should have enforced it for the 2023 and beyond incoming classes. LSU gets the big PR hit but Indiana started all of this shite.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:14 pm to Go Go Gata
Damn! Vote was 16-0. Which means LSU didn't veer away, stayed on the tracks with the other 15 SEC schools.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:16 pm to SEC Doctor
Still makes no sense to me that a guy can play professionally in Europe and come back to college but can't play professionally in the US and return.
you not real bright are you? look up the difference
you not real bright are you? look up the difference
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:17 pm to RIPMachoMan
Maybe he can get Ryan Clark's old job.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:20 pm to Adam Banks
Louisiana jurisprudence does seem to favor positions held by Louisiana State University.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:26 pm to WylieTiger
quote:
The 5/5 ruling should not have counted against the 2022 class. All of this crap would be moot if those idiots got it correct. They should have enforced it for the 2023 and beyond incoming classes. LSU gets the big PR hit but Indiana started all of this shite.
Agreed on this 100%, I'm interested to see if the "Not formally withdrawn" from the draft affects players from the 2022 and 2021 classes who were out of eligibility at the time to withdraw from the draft.
Could that wording ultimately doom Chambliss if he was automatically entered and did not officially withdraw from the draft.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:53 pm to TideSaint
quote:
Big 12 literally cleared the way for the SEC's actions today.
It has nothing to do with the legal action and the TRO’s.
I think you need to shake things up every once in a while. It would be cool to see some conference changes. FSU, Clemson or Tulane to the SEC. LSU to the B12
Posted on 8/25/26 at 8:54 pm to Richleau
quote:
It’s pretty explicit what Sankey can do to enforce the bylaws of the conference. Again, just read.
And again, I ask….what’s he going to do if a court of law says otherwise?
I don’t care if these guys come back and play or not, so I’m not emotionally pinned to the situation.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:03 pm to TigerAlumni2010
quote:
Agreed on this 100%, I'm interested to see if the "Not formally withdrawn" from the draft affects players from the 2022 and 2021 classes who were out of eligibility at the time to withdraw from the draft.
I would assume not
quote:
Could that wording ultimately doom Chambliss if he was automatically entered and did not officially withdraw from the draft.
I wouldn't think so, as he got his TRO early enough that he was never actually out of eligibility so he was never part of the draft process.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:15 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
I am not a lawyer, and I think this is the proper course of action. However, IMO it’s going to be awfully hard for the SEC and the other conferences to defend selective enforcement of eligibility rules in court.
Easiest redneck terms to put this in…
If you’re a deer hunter in Louisiana and you voluntarily joined a deer club and you pay dues to hunt on that clubs lease and signed a contract when you joined stating you’d follow the clubs rules. Then two years down the road, a new rule is passed in the club that only bucks with four points on one side will be killed and each member can only kill one buck. These rules do not align with the deer harvesting regulations for the state of Louisiana, but they’re your clubs rules. Two different things.
Your options are pretty simple, and court isn’t one of them because you voluntarily joined the club and agreed by contract when joining that you would abide by the clubs rules. So basically, you can find another deer club to hunt with, or abide by the clubs rules.
Except the NCAA is not like the state of Louisiana in this situation. The NCAA is a voluntary organization just like the SEC. So why can courts tell the NCAA it cannot enforce its rules but allow the SEC to enforce its rules?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:24 pm to OleVaught14
LSU won't but the players will
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:26 pm to LSU90
quote:
LSU won't but the players will
They can try. But that will be a new lawsuit, in federal court, and no chance at being heard before the season starts.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:29 pm to jangalang
quote:
LSU as a whole university in athletics is moving so disgusting right now. I genuinely can’t believe this is the product I’m seeing. It’s become Money over morals and I’m absolutely disgusted.
I love my university but this is just fricking disgusting how we’re moving.
Breiden Fehoko
Didn't he read the Rant...morals are gay.
This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:32 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
And again, I ask….what’s he going to do if a court of law says otherwise?
The only party that has standing to sue the SEC would be LSU. Who was part of the 16-0 vote to implement this policy. If a player tries to sue the conference they would get laughed out of any competent court. Lack of standing.
Also, I seriously doubt the local yokel friendly court has jurisdiction over the SEC and Sankey. Even if they did somehow, the could simply ignore it. If there is no standing there is no subject matter jurisdiction. Which you can’t ever waive and can be raised on appeal in the unlikely event you ever are hauled into court.
This thing is over. Local corrupt college town fanboy judges have no power here. The gig is up. The Big 12 played the bylaw Trump card and sued Tech. You’ll notice Sorsby and Tech went away almost immediately after that lawsuit was filed. With their tails between their legs.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:34 pm to houstonearler
Look at you trying to use big words like you know what they mean
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:34 pm to geauxbrown
Well, you can challenge anything in court so what’s your point?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:38 pm to Richleau
Popular
Back to top

1







