Started By
Message
PFF grades Defensive Lines
Posted on 9/23/21 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 9/23/21 at 3:33 pm
LINK
1. Oklahoma - 90.4
2. Auburn - 90.0
3. Tennessee - 89.7
4. USC - 85.9
5. LSU - 83.9
First of all, curious that UGA isn’t there.
Second of all, how the frick is Auburn 2? We couldn’t get a pass rush against PSU to save our lives
1. Oklahoma - 90.4
2. Auburn - 90.0
3. Tennessee - 89.7
4. USC - 85.9
5. LSU - 83.9
First of all, curious that UGA isn’t there.
Second of all, how the frick is Auburn 2? We couldn’t get a pass rush against PSU to save our lives
5
Posted on 9/23/21 at 3:34 pm to Weagle25
If this is cumulative, we had very good DL performances the first two weeks against poor competition.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 3:34 pm to Weagle25
Because y’all played the school of the blind the first two weeks
Posted on 9/23/21 at 3:34 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
PFF is supposed to take quality of opponent into account though
Posted on 9/23/21 at 3:54 pm to Weagle25
This is an objectively stupid ranking. There is no one on this planet who would take any of the top 5 over UGA’s to date.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 3:58 pm to Crowknowsbest
The only logical explanation I can even come up with to justify their numbers is that they're looking at raw stats as opposed to relative stats... ie. X number of total sacks > Y% of total passing downs resulting in sack.
Similar for stops, pass break ups, etc.
Otherwise, I can't even make sense out of their math.
here someone posted the top teams for each raw stat line: LINK
Similar for stops, pass break ups, etc.
Otherwise, I can't even make sense out of their math.
here someone posted the top teams for each raw stat line: LINK
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:07 pm to fibonaccisquared
quote:
The only logical explanation I can even come up with to justify their numbers is that they're looking at raw stats as opposed to relative stats... ie. X number of total sacks > Y% of total passing downs resulting in sack.
Must be because USC has 3 Total Sacks and 12 Tackles for loss on the season
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:08 pm to Weagle25
The AU d-line is spectacular as long as you don't mind giving the opponent's qb 8+ seconds to get rid of the ball.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:09 pm to fibonaccisquared
I think they actually watch film and grade. I also thought quality of opponent mattered.
But from the rankings, I have a hard time believing either of those statements
But from the rankings, I have a hard time believing either of those statements
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:17 pm to BoCam2
quote:
The AU d-line is spectacular as long as you don't mind giving the opponent's qb 8+ seconds to get rid of the ball.
Bo, that you?
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:21 pm to Bosethus68
quote:
Bo, that you?
I think so?
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:27 pm to Weagle25
Almost all of the talent that we had from the past few defensive line classes is no longer on the team.
Auburn’s line is awful.
Auburn’s line is awful.
Posted on 9/23/21 at 4:28 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
This is an objectively stupid ranking. There is no one on this planet who would take any of the top 5 over UGA’s to date.
OUs Dline has a very high havoc rating. It’s quite amazing what Riley and grinch have done on that side of the ball in 1.5 years considering how god awful OUs Dline was before that.
This post was edited on 9/23/21 at 4:30 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News