re: Noted LSU fan SVP seems to think Wade is shady and full of crap

quote:

---

It appears you have made a lot of posters angry at SVP.

---

Which is hilarious given he’s the best ESPN has anymore.

Why are you concerned?

quote:

---

You're right Alabama is the cleanest program in the SEC? Never paid Albert Means, never been on probation, stopped cheating all together when Saban was hired. I know that you are trolling, but what a joke if you think Alabama is not involved in this shite storm. I'm sure Blazer perjured himself in Federal Court and lied to the FBI, no harm there rifght? That's not a crime right? But yeah, Alabama has nothing to worry about. Keep dreaming the dream brother.

---

Are you so stupid that you don't even realize that Marty Blazer is a runner for agents and/or shoe companies, not schools?
If he had anything to do with a player from one of those schools, I don't know, BUT that's got nothing to do with ANY school cheating. It would be between the player and Blazer and the agent or shoe company.
Before you start running that dicksucker of yours, you need to get at least a clue of what you're talking about.

"Are you so stupid that you don't even realize that Marty Blazer is a runner for agents and/or shoe companies, not schools?
If he had anything to do with a player from one of those schools, I don't know, BUT that's got nothing to do with ANY school cheating. It would be between the player and Blazer and the agent or shoe company.
Before you start running that dicksucker of yours, you need to get at least a clue of what you're talking about."

________________________________________________________

Stupid ? it’s all part of the same corruption trial dumbass . Over 50 major conference programs are thought to be involved. Nobody knows the extent of involvement by any of the schools. Alabama is one of the schools mentioned and I assure you is just as dirty as the rest. Talk about stupidity you dumbfrick.

quote:

---

I know the difference between the two. At this point I’m sure Wade’s actions were nefarious. However, I doubt it will be found that Wade himself made payments to these athletes. In fact the whole corruption trial was about third parties being paid to influence the kids to go to certain schools and shoe contracts. The NCAA was satisfied after interviewing Smart that he didn’t directly receive money from LSU. What is believed is that his handlers received money to steer him to LSU. So you tell me, what’s the difference? Additionally, do you really believe that Alabama being mentioned at the trial has no validity and that It’s running a clean program?

---

See, you say you know the difference between the 2, but then you keep posting and you show that you don't know the difference between the 2.

1 of the things being talked about is bringing kids to your school. You are getting recruits because you are paying them to come to your school.

The other is where agents are trying to buy influence with future NFL players so that those players will hopefully sign with them when they leave college. It's unwanted by schools, and the schools do everything they can to prevent it from happening. Saban is on record bitching about shady agents, not on record talking about strong arse offers he made to get recruits.

It's the complete opposite and you don't seem to get it.

quote:

---

Stupid ? it’s all part of the same corruption trial dumbass . Over 50 major conference programs are thought to be involved. Nobody knows the extent of involvement by any of the schools. Alabama is one of the schools mentioned and I assure you is just as dirty as the rest. Talk about stupidity you dumbfrick.

---

Alabama wasn't mentioned as a school, it was players from Alabama football because again, it's about agents who are trying to gain influence with future NFL players.

Any program that has NFL talent faces similar issues. Alabama/Saban does what it can to prevent these agents because it's bad for the program and doesn't benefit them at all.

Will Wade on the other hand is actively working with these agents to get highly ranked recruits for the pure benefit of his own career and your program.

quote:

---

I do, I was making a point that Alabama has a history of cheating. I’m sure Bama, like the rest of the major programs does whatever necessary to gain an edge against their competition .. There is a lot naivety on this Board if they actually believe cheating is not rampant among all schools.

---

Do you consider $100 handshakes to be cheating? If so, then yes, it happens among all schools.

But if you think all schools buy players, then I do not agree at all.

"See, you say you know the difference between the 2, but then you keep posting and you show that you don't know the difference between the 2.

1 of the things being talked about is bringing kids to your school. You are getting recruits because you are paying them to come to your school.

The other is where agents are trying to buy influence with future NFL players so that those players will hopefully sign with them when they leave college. It's unwanted by schools, and the schools do everything they can to prevent it from happening. Saban is on record bitching about shady agents, not on record talking about strong arse offers he made to get recruits.

It's the complete opposite and you don't seem to get it."

_________________________________________________________

Again, Smart and his family were not paid according to what they stated to the ncaa investigators when interviewed. Apparently, the ncaa believed them and he was cleared to play. Naz Ried also denies being paid. If either were paid the amount that has been rumored it will be easy to disprove them.

Wade is allegedly heard on tape discussing an amount but isnt specific. If Smart and Reid or their families didn’t receive improper benefits then who did? (I do believe somebody was paid)

Do you think Wade actually had 300k to pay their asking price or do you think a 3rd party was involved? If the players didn’t receive the money, do you think a 3rd party was paid.

I don’t think the difference is as big as you believe.

You do realize the schools involved are right in the middle of that. It’s the same handlers used for all aspects of recruiting and swaying towards shoe companies. They didn’t accidentally catch them on tape with coaches, they were like looking to do that, as they are saying these handlers were extorting universities.

The difference is the FBI isn’t looking to bust a coach or a school. They are going for the handler for, against attempting to extort the university.

[quote]You do realize the schools involved are right in the middle of that. It’s the same handlers used for all aspects of recruiting and swaying towards shoe companies. They didn’t accidentally catch them on tape with coaches, they were like looking to do that, as they are saying these handlers were extorting universities.

The difference is the FBI isn’t looking to bust a coach or a school. They are going for the handler for, against attempting to extort the university.
............................................................

Well cas4t, you just earned a place in the 10% along with the other two dimwits.
I'm gonna say this one more time....the investigation involves agents, shoe companies and PLAYERS already playing for teams....NOT the college teams they play for.
While tapping the phone of an agent, they caught a college basketball COACH discussing purchasing players with the agent that the FBI is interested in.
Now the NCAA doesn't have to follow the rule of law, therefore they can punish an entity found committing an infraction regardless of how they came upon the information.
There's the facts, so y'all can twist and stretch them in any direction you want to, but things are gonna be what they're gonna be, so.....just hide and watch!