Started By
Message
re: nick saban's quote on college football playoffs
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:28 am to lsupride87
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:28 am to lsupride87
quote:
I have no issue with a non division winner making the playoffs over a division winner in college football
First it was that non division winners shouldnt be winning championships. Now it is this. Keep moving that goal post champ
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:30 am to elposter
quote:
Happens it just about every sport. Wild cards in MLB and NFL, third/fourth place division finishers in NBA, etc. All make the playoffs
Can you give us one example in any of the above leagues you mentioned of when the 2nd place team in a division makes the playoffs and the champion of that same division does not make the playoffs? Well, that's what you have going on in college football.
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:30 am to lsupride87
That wasn't any personal insult
Auburn had their opportunity to make their case, and they got BTFO by UGA, who was one pass play away from winning the title against the team that you apparently think was undeserving.
The team that beat #1 and #2 in consecutive weeks, and lost 1 game on the road
You also owe an apology to an innocent man
Auburn had their opportunity to make their case, and they got BTFO by UGA, who was one pass play away from winning the title against the team that you apparently think was undeserving.
The team that beat #1 and #2 in consecutive weeks, and lost 1 game on the road
You also owe an apology to an innocent man
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:30 am to AUCE05
quote:
I can't take CFB serious until they implement a conference champion metric. Teams winning a championship without even winning their division is hilarious.
If the conference champ is not automatically in, there is no point in playing conference championships. It’s making some teams play an extra game that could potentially negatively impact them and is unfair.
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:31 am to StopRobot
I haven’t moved my goal post at all champ
It’s simple. And it is the same. A division champ shouldn’t move below a team in their division due to the result of an extra game
It’s simple. And it is the same. A division champ shouldn’t move below a team in their division due to the result of an extra game
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:37 am to Jason9782003
quote:Can you give an example of a 4 team playoff in any sport?
Can you give us one example in any of the above leagues you mentioned of when the 2nd place team in a division makes the playoffs and the champion of that same division does not make the playoffs?
4 best get in. Period.
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:37 am to lsupride87
quote:
Congrats
In 2011, 2012, and 2017 yall lost in the month of November and still made the playoffs/title game
Look I agree with Saban in theory, but the truth is that theory applies to most schools but not Bama apparantly
That is why it is ironic coming from him
Ironic since 7SU lost late in 2011 season too. rmft.
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:38 am to lsupride87
quote:Well I suppose they could've chosen to not play in the SECCG, and take their chances on the committee seeding them in the playoff? But we all know the entire fan base would've revolted because all we heard for a solid week was how they were going to dismantle UGA and "beat the dog crap" out of them again in ATL.
They finished the job before they had to play an EXTRA game
The current system we have in place to determine the CFP teams was agreed to by all schools. People whined and bitched the ranking system and we got the BCS, people bitched about the BCS and now we have a playoff and some are still whining and bitching.
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:39 am to JuiceTerry
quote:Then come out and say that and be consistent
4 best get in. Period.
They spout of all this bullshite year to year and completely change their talking point and contradict themselves
Just say we are going to pick the 4 teams we personally feel are the best
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:39 am to AshLSU
quote:
If the conference champ is not automatically in, there is no point in playing conference championships. It’s making some teams play an extra game that could potentially negatively impact them and is unfair.
Drop Champ game and divisions, go to a 10 game SEC schedule?
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:41 am to lsupride87
Also, a simple fix is to make a disclaimer a team in a conference champ game can’t slide below someone that stayed home that week
That makes sense and does not favor anyone. All will potentially benefit at some point
That makes sense and does not favor anyone. All will potentially benefit at some point
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:41 am to Gustave
quote:
Drop Champ game and divisions, go to a 10 game SEC schedule?
People go full retard when they get desperate.
The SECCG is the most important conference game of the entire season.
All of the talk about 9 or 10 game conference schedules ignores the most obvious fact that only 1 conference game is critical to the success of the SEC. And that is the conference championship game.
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:41 am to Gustave
quote:Mkes way more sense to me
Drop Champ game and divisions, go to a 10 game SEC schedule?
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:41 am to AshLSU
quote:Take it up with Aleva and F. King!
If the conference champ is not automatically in, there is no point in playing conference championships. It’s making some teams play an extra game that could potentially negatively impact them and is unfair.
Damn, until the fans petition their Administration, the Athletic Director and President/Chancellor there will be no change. If Joe Aleva and King Alexander don't feel that there should be a conference championship game, then this week is the time to voice their opinion. They are ALL sitting around a damn table in Destin right now - SPEAK UP while you have the floor.
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:42 am to lsupride87
quote:
It’s simple. And it is the same. A division champ shouldn’t move below a team in their division due to the result of an extra game
I can see your reasoning...but it's not practical. The committee has never put a 2-loss team in the play-off; there's no way they were gonna put in a 3-loss team, especially one that was not a conference champ. And since the committee had set a precedent last year, choosing a 1-loss Ohio State while leaving out a 2-loss Penn State, who not only beat OSU head-to-head, but won their division AND their conference, there's no way AU was getting in without winning the SEC.
Letting in OSU in 2016 while leaving Penn State out was much more questionable than letting Bama in this past season...at least when Bama was voted in, the champs from their conference made it in as well...
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:44 am to lsupride87
quote:They have said that, and they've voted that way
Just say we are going to pick the 4 teams we personally feel are the best
Why are you crying about 4 loss Auburn and not undefeated UCF?
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:45 am to lsupride87
quote:
They finished the job before they had to play an EXTRA game
Nah, the only reason they were mentioned as a playoff possibility was because they would have an extra game and needed to win said extra game to even be considered. Without an SECCG win the entire world knew they were not going to the playoff
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:46 am to lsupride87
Everyone is deflecting using AU. UGA was screwed by the flawed CFB system last year. They completed every task. Won their division. Won their conference. Bama recieved additional rest to heal their LBers, while UGA grinded against AU twice, then the playoffs. UGA was the best team last year amd was hosed by a team that couldn't win their division.
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:47 am to JuiceTerry
I have made my case for UCf before
And why do you keep acting like this actually has anything to do with auburn or Bama?
I don’t care if auburn had 11 losses
Once the committee but them ahead of Bama, they shouldn’t have slid below them for playing the extra game
It’s simple, add the disclaimer a conference champ participant can’t slide below someone who stayed at home
That follows logic and will honestly benefit Bama more than anyone going forward
And why do you keep acting like this actually has anything to do with auburn or Bama?
I don’t care if auburn had 11 losses
Once the committee but them ahead of Bama, they shouldn’t have slid below them for playing the extra game
It’s simple, add the disclaimer a conference champ participant can’t slide below someone who stayed at home
That follows logic and will honestly benefit Bama more than anyone going forward
Posted on 5/30/18 at 11:48 am to lsupride87
They didn’t. They moved down because they lost
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News