Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:07 pm to adambomb
This will only invent a new way of cheating. The difference is the rich schools and in the game and the schools who cheated will have to find some money.
USC and A&M can write the checks that will not bounce and that is what it is all about. Look for the cheating schools to call foul because they still can not keep up.
USC and A&M can write the checks that will not bounce and that is what it is all about. Look for the cheating schools to call foul because they still can not keep up.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:17 pm to Irons Puppet
A&M can’t buy as many elite players as Texas and USC can.
If regulations fall to the conferences and A&M doesn’t agree with the rest of the SEC institutions then A&M will probably be booted out of the conference. 3/4 vote would be easy.
If regulations fall to the conferences and A&M doesn’t agree with the rest of the SEC institutions then A&M will probably be booted out of the conference. 3/4 vote would be easy.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:21 pm to C W
If A&M was booted. They would sue and win.
It’s a new era. You don’t rule the world anymore.
Sorry.
It’s a new era. You don’t rule the world anymore.
Sorry.
This post was edited on 5/9/22 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:22 pm to adambomb
Holy crap. Can you read? A&M has maybe 2 guys with NIL deals. Try harder. Gonna be so funny when tu anf the ones crying the loudest get investigated. Cant wait.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:25 pm to C W
quote:
If regulations fall to the conferences and A&M doesn’t agree with the rest of the SEC institutions then A&M will probably be booted out of the conference. 3/4 vote would be easy.
They can’t make regulations that are illegal. If A&M was booted for not agreeing to illegal regulations the SEC would be sued for billions and would lose.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:27 pm to RB10
Where in the hell is your proof that A&M had any infraction? Oh yeah, brobible. Stupid.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:27 pm to C W
quote:
A&M will probably be booted out of the conference. 3/4 vote would be easy.
Yeah. Probably.
A damn shame what A&M did to all of these sec schools who have historically just tried to play by the rules.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:28 pm to BigSneezy
That may or may not be. It depends on how the NCAA sanctions the school. The fact it may harm the booster’s business isn’t enough to constitute tortuous interference. They have to prove intent to interfere, not simply that it resulted from sanctions against the school. The NCAA could still sanction the school and the fact that a booster suffers harm indirectly will not give rise to tortious interference, even if the NCAA knows that may result in harm to the booster’s interests.
This post was edited on 5/9/22 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:29 pm to G2160
I think Saban really does run the NCAA. How about that?
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:31 pm to WilliamTaylor21
Y’all’s fear is sad. What a pack of pussies.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:38 pm to Mr Sausage
quote:
Y’all’s fear is sad. What a pack of pussies.
Imagine thinking anyone is scared of Aggy. It’s just funny that you losers thought you’d finally be able to buy a title.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:39 pm to BigSneezy
quote:
They can’t make regulations that are illegal.
As been noted by so many already, the courts decided that players can market their name and image with legitimate businesses, not that boosters can buy players
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:46 pm to C W
So the question is......which deals does the ncaa view as egregious.
I figure. USC and Caleb Williams and Addison
TexASS and their collectives
Aggie just for the number of 5 stars they bought....
I figure. USC and Caleb Williams and Addison
TexASS and their collectives
Aggie just for the number of 5 stars they bought....
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:49 pm to C W
quote:
As been noted by so many already, the courts decided that players can market their name and image with legitimate businesses, not that boosters can buy players
You know how easy it is to form an LLC and make it appear to be a legitimate business? We can’t take down the cartel but the NCAA is going to bring down the Ags. Yeah.
I’ll have what your drinking.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 7:53 pm to C W
quote:
As been noted by so many already, the courts decided that players can market their name and image with legitimate businesses, not that boosters can buy players
Define "legitimate business"
Posted on 5/9/22 at 8:00 pm to BigSneezy
Also as already noted, if the 8&4feit boosters did it within NIL regulations, why are you so against NIL regulations?
Posted on 5/9/22 at 8:24 pm to C W
quote:
Also as already noted, if the 8&4feit boosters did it within NIL regulations, why are you so against NIL regulations?
This is like gambling being legal. Then, changing the law to make it illegal. Then saying "why are you so against outlawing gambling"?
Posted on 5/9/22 at 8:47 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
This is like gambling being legal. Then, changing the law to make it illegal. Then saying "why are you so against outlawing gambling"?
Bad analogy.
More like saying casino gambling is now legal. Ok, gambling is still legal but we are going to go back and enforce no dog fights because that’s not what we meant by casino gambling is now legal. And then saying “why are you so against dog fighting?”
But you’re pissed because you took “legal casino gambling” to mean you could take every barn and build a fighting pit and name them casinos.
Page 5 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News