Started By
Message
re: New NIL Guidelines passed
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:00 pm to lewis and herschel
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:00 pm to lewis and herschel
quote:
Retroactive will not stand up if it makes to Federal Court.
It's not retroactive, these rules are just clarification.
But beyond that, why do people think the federal court system is somehow the place where these things are decided? This will never see a court room of any level.
The NCAA is voluntary. If A&M or anyone else doesn't like it, they can just leave.
1
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:04 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
The lawsuits will be glorious. The NCAA is toast.
wait and watch and weep.
Courts never said boosters can provide incentives for play for pay, and the ncaa isn't prohibiting players from using NIL.
The vast majority of member institutions are demanding regulations. Your team doesn't want to play by those rules? You don't have to. Good luck out on your own.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:06 pm to adambomb
If Aggie gets hammered for this then I’ll believe Saban really does run college football
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:07 pm to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
Aggie Football
RIP
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:07 pm to lewis and herschel
quote:
Retroactive will not stand up if it makes to Fede
I don't think they will actually pursue cases from this last year. Too much to investigate and pursue.
Start now and enforce the rules going forward.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:07 pm to V Bainbridge
quote:
something to show for it by then.
Worth it.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
If Aggie gets hammered for this then I’ll believe Saban really does run college football
Nearly all member institutions favor NIL regulations. I'm sure LSU administration does too.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:12 pm to adambomb
quote:
sanctions are retroactive
I agree with the rule change, but this is stupid.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:12 pm to BLG
quote:
I'm sure LSU administration does too.
Only because we didn't have a NIL program set up.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:14 pm to adambomb
Derrick Crawford doing work.
Love that bastard.
Love that bastard.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:15 pm to BLG
quote:
Nearly all member institutions favor NIL regulations. I'm sure LSU administration does too.
Hey this one time we’re on the same side
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:16 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
Only because we didn't have a NIL program set up.
but honestly, few programs can buy as many elite players as boosters at Texas and USC can. Yeah, Nick Saban has been a regular in the playoffs, but he's one guy. I don't think many reasonable Alabama fans expect this consistently when he retires. USC and Texas would be like forever if there were no regulations against buying players, so that would eventually kill college football, and too many people make too much money on college football to let it die.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:18 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Hey this one time we’re on the same side
ha
like another poster said before, the original core SEC teams might fight like hell, but when it really matters, they vote as a bloc.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:21 pm to BLG
quote:
wait and watch and weep.
Courts never said boosters can provide incentives for play for pay, and the ncaa isn't prohibiting players from using NIL.
The vast majority of member institutions are demanding regulations. Your team doesn't want to play by those rules? You don't have to. Good luck out on your own.
Hasn’t saban publicly jerked himself to how much his qb was making without playing a down of football?
quote:
Our quarterback has approached ungodly numbers, and he hasn't even played yet
Nothing will happen to A&M.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:23 pm to adambomb
Jimbo's about to pull an Urban, fake a heart issue, and deuce out.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:24 pm to G2160
quote:
Hasn’t saban publicly jerked himself to how much his qb was making without playing a down of football?
He was already on the roster so how much he makes is irrelevant. The issue is programs going out and offering deals to recruits. Can't do that.
quote:
Nothing will happen to A&M.
If the NCAA decides to enforce their rules aTm will be one of several programs that get hit with sanctions. The only real question is how much longer the have's of CFB play by the NCAA's rules rather than starting their own league.
This post was edited on 5/9/22 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:28 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
I agree with the rule change, but this is stupid.
Why? Everyone knew boosters couldn't pay highschool recruits. Just because they claimed ignorance before guidelines were put in place doesn't mean they didn't deliberately shite all over the intent. They knew exactly what they were doing.
This post was edited on 5/9/22 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:33 pm to KaiserSoze99
They didn't make new rules retard, they clarified that by the existing rules it was illegal AF and 8&4 is about to long for they days that they could get bowl invitations to forfeit.
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:33 pm to adambomb
quote:
Boosters can’t interact with recruits, sanctions are retroactive
Posted on 5/9/22 at 5:34 pm to G2160
quote:
Hasn’t saban publicly jerked himself to how much his qb was making without playing a down of football?
Bryce Young's NIL deals were exactly how it was planned. He was already at Alabama when he got those deals, though his celebrity as the #1 high school qb in his class certainly didn't hurt.
He represents a BMW dealer in Birmingham, as well as Cash App and other legitimate businesses.
On the flip side, 8&4feit boosters paying high school players to sign with you team was never the intention of NIL, and is and has always clearly been against NCAA rules.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News