Started By
Message
Posted on 12/6/17 at 4:14 pm to 1999
Yeah A&M just set the bar on how to throw money out the window. i have a feeling after a few 8-4 seasons under jimbo they gonna be rethinking all that money they spent to get him.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 4:22 pm to TxWadingFool
So after his 3rd year it goes from 9.8M to 7.3M. I don't think there is a way we don't give him at least three and probably 4 unless it is just a complete disaster. Assuming we don't make a stupid raise (Jeff Long) it will be between 7.3m and 4.9m. The AD will have to make a decision after the 3rd year because you obviously want your coaches to have at least 4 years minimum on a contract.
Probably a little higher if I had to guess but I don't think it is unreasonable or worrying.
Probably a little higher if I had to guess but I don't think it is unreasonable or worrying.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 12/6/17 at 4:24 pm to TxWadingFool
That looks exactly like what Smart's buyout looks like with UGA.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 5:06 pm to cardboardboxer
Remember when Hog coach Bert was going to outsmart everyone by signing all his assistants to binding contracts that didn't allow them to leave? I 'member. Worked out well didn't it?
Now the new Hog AD is going to rewrite the coaches contract playbook. Whoa-key doh-key.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 6:50 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
Based on performance at other schools? You'd have to be the dumbest AD in history to assume past performance at a different school guarantees future results at your school to the point you pay out millions up front for it.
Based on performance at your current job dude...
For example...attract a top-tier coach for $7 million+ a year but add performance clauses. Simple.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 6:51 pm to Mizz-SEC
It’s a gimmick for a program that needs them.
Posted on 12/6/17 at 7:12 pm to cardboardboxer
This guy is going to spout off the mouth about all kinds of shite and hawg fans will eat it up under the guise of sailing.
Back to top


2






