Started By
Message
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:45 pm to AggieDub14
For lsu fans targeting can mean whatever you need it to mean. It's pretty magical
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:14 pm to fibonaccisquared
For the people bitching about still images, video replays of both linked here: LINK
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:16 pm to narddogg81
quote:
For lsu fans targeting can mean whatever you need it to mean. It's pretty magical
Or it can just mean what the rule states it means. In other words, not what Devin White did.
ETA: Also that the rule is applied logically. The entire premise of "Well, if you're not sure it's a penalty, it's still a penalty" is ridiculous. You shouldn't be ejecting players unless you're certain they should be ejected.
This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:19 pm to fibonaccisquared
quote:
For the people bitching about still images, video replays of both linked here:
Look at those damn LSU fans bitching about White! How delusional!
Wait, what?
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:22 pm to RB10
quote:
Look at those damn LSU fans bitching about White! How delusional!
Wait, what?
Not sure what the intent was here... I'm in agreement that the White hit didn't warrant an ejection. I'm in the Peter Burns camp 100%. Gimme a flagrant 1/2 style penalty where you can actually penalize players who go above and beyond what would be considered a normal football play while still penalizing the hit and trying to get *less* helmet/helmet collisions in the game. Ejections on judgement calls for a single play are ridiculous. Whether it's my team, your team, or a team I don't give two shits about. Just call it consistently and as close to fairly as can be done.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:29 pm to AggieDub14
Targeting is defined as forcible contact to the head or neck area. Nobody can look at that photo of Wilson and say that wasn't forcible contact to the neck area. Even the Tennessee injury report said a hurt clavicle.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:30 pm to fibonaccisquared
quote:
Not sure what the intent was here... I'm in agreement that the White hit didn't warrant an ejection.
The intent was to make fun of all the mouth breathers saying it's just LSU fans complaining about this call.
It's not. It's being talked about nationally.
ETA: I'm not saying you're one of them. Just using the article you posted as proof.
This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:54 pm to texag7
quote:
should have went
to english class
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:55 pm to RB10
Just making sure. We've gone toe to toe once or twice before. Usually it is at least for actual disagreement though...
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:04 pm to RB10
quote:he left his feet, he hit a defenseless player, he hit hit in the head and neck area (doesn't have to be helmet or crown of helmet). Sorry bro, that some pussy targeting, but it's technically correct. Which is the best kind of correct
Or it can just mean what the rule states it means. In other words, not what Devin White did.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:05 pm to narddogg81
quote:
he left his feet
Incorrect.
quote:
he hit a defenseless player
Does not constitute targeting.
quote:
he hit hit in the head and neck area (doesn't have to be helmet or crown of helmet).
Incorrect.
quote:
Sorry bro, that some pussy targeting, but it's technically correct. Which is the best kind of correct
Nothing you posted is even technically correct.
Solid contribution.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:08 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:Mack Wilson made a textbook tackle
n the Tennessee injury report said a hurt clavicle.
When did the clavicle become part of the head or neck?
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:11 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
When did the clavicle become part of the head or neck?
If the chest (Where White made contact) is part of the head or neck area, as so many Bama fans have claimed, the clavicle certainly is. The clavicle sits above the chest.
***To be clear I'm saying neither is targeting. Before I get accused of being a homer by another Bama fan saying only White's was. Again.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:12 pm to RB10
quote:
quote:
he left his feet
Incorrect.
He did
quote:it's the major determing factor
quote:
he left his feet
Incorrect.
quote:
quote:
he hit hit in the head and neck area (doesn't have to be helmet or crown of helmet).
Incorrect.
Sorry but that's the rule
No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:14 pm to narddogg81
quote:
No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)
I know the rule. White didn't break it.
quote:
He did
How does one "leave their feet" only to continue to run through the player? Physics don't really mesh there.
quote:
it's the major determing factor
Defenseless player has to apply for targeting to be considered. Defenseless player does not determine whether is was targeting.
There is a difference.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:38 pm to RB10
quote:
I am. The crown of White's helmet isn't anywhere near Fitz.
Next question, do you actually know what the crown of a helmet is?
Apparently, you don't. In regards to targeting, the crown is considered anything above the facemask.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:42 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
Apparently, you don't. In regards to targeting, the crown is considered anything above the facemask.
So the crown of the helmet starts at the player's eyebrows? Yeah, I'll stick with the actual definition of crown. You know, the top.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:50 pm to RB10
Serious question.. Who fills in for White?
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News