Started By
Message

re: New 5 for 5 Rule Scenario/Question

Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by LSUTigresFan
SE Louisiana to Austin (Texas Ex)
Member since Mar 2013
6947 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

High school does

And you can’t accommodate everyone. There has to be lines drawn or it will continue to be a free for all.


High school and university are literally not the same thing...
Posted by LSUTigresFan
SE Louisiana to Austin (Texas Ex)
Member since Mar 2013
6947 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

It say from time of enrollment or 19 so if they enroll at 23 that would we okay if I am reading it correctly. It's to stop the clock on those coming back to school


It is whatever comes first. so eligibility starts at 19 if you don't enroll before then.
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
12348 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

It say from time of enrollment or 19 so if they enroll at 23 that would we okay if I am reading it correctly. It's to stop the clock on those coming back to school


incorrect. The eligibilty starts at 19 whether you enroll or not. The idea is to eliminate what is happening in college basketball where 28 year old Euros come in and use the NCAA as a minor league to get to the NBA.
Posted by BuckeyeGoon
Member since Jan 2025
1272 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Do you think colleges will tell kids that graduate HS at 18 to take a development year and just train and then enroll as 19 year olds?

This would really only make sense for like 3 star and below recruits who dont seem to have nfl potential coming out of high school. Telling a blue chip recruit to sit out a year just gives you less time with him before he leaves for the nfl.

You may end up with more experienced, lesser talented players on the backend doing this strategy but I still think you're better off getting 4 and 5 star players on the field as soon as possible.
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
12348 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

High school and university are literally not the same thing...


How are they different in this specific regard? you can't go to HS and play varsity football as a 26 year old, why should you be bale to do that in college?
Posted by LSUTigresFan
SE Louisiana to Austin (Texas Ex)
Member since Mar 2013
6947 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

How are they different in this specific regard? you can't go to HS and play varsity football as a 26 year old, why should you be bale to do that in college?


You cant be this stupid, right?
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
12348 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

This would really only make sense for like 3 star and below recruits who dont seem to have nfl potential coming out of high school. Telling a blue chip recruit to sit out a year just gives you less time with him before he leaves for the nfl.

You may end up with more experienced, lesser talented players on the backend doing this strategy but I still think you're better off getting 4 and 5 star players on the field as soon as possible.


well yeah, 5 stars aren't gonna be asked to do this but it could give a 3 star the extra year of development they need to have a big 5th year and play their way into being drafted.
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
12348 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

You cant be this stupid, right?


Maybe I am that stupid. please enligten me why HS sports are sacred and need to have age limits but college sports should be a free for all for all age groups?
Posted by LSUTigresFan
SE Louisiana to Austin (Texas Ex)
Member since Mar 2013
6947 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:18 pm to
Idk, maybe because one is typically for children and the other is for adults.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41796 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

The new rule states that a player has 5 years to play 5 seasons starting either at enrollment OR at the age of 19, whichever occurs earliest



You missed that part.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
34593 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:21 pm to
What are we calling a 5th year player?

Senior? Super senior? Grad?
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
12348 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Idk, maybe because one is typically for children and the other is for adults.


The maturity and strength difference between an 18 year old and a 22 year old is already a huge difference. There is zero reason 25+ year olds should be included. If you are 25, go pro or retire.
Posted by LSUTigresFan
SE Louisiana to Austin (Texas Ex)
Member since Mar 2013
6947 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

What are we calling a 5th year player?

Senior? Super senior? Grad?


Someone that is in their fifth year of university in some capacity. usually a senior is any student with 90 completed credit hours.
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
12348 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

What are we calling a 5th year player?


my guess is "5th year senior"
Posted by HogsWillRiseAgain
Central LA
Member since Dec 2013
944 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 1:59 pm to
It seems this rule is to get ahead of guys that go to NFL and are stuck on the practice squad for a couple years from trying to come back and use any college eligibility they have left like the G-league guys in NBA. Which makes sense considering the clown show that college basketball has become.

Now they need to put a restriction on how many times a player can enter the transfer portal
Posted by SneezyBeltranIsHere
Member since Jul 2021
4323 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

I can’t speak for all schools but Kiffin has stated that he isn’t paying top dollar for HS kids unless he sees a path for them to play as freshman.


Not every school is broke.
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
12348 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Not every school is broke.


Its not about being broke, its about allocating funds efficiently. No matter how much money donors have, they dont want to see millions of their dollars go to guys that come in, sit the bench for a year, and then transfer out without playing a meaningful down for the school.
Posted by NWLA_Bama
Member since Aug 2024
1633 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

You can't exclude people from playing college sports if they decide to go back in their 20s.



Why not?
Posted by Gunga Din
Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2020
3610 posts
Posted on 6/24/26 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Is it enrollment at any school, or does it need to be a 4 year institution? Wonder if this could give JUCO football life again


Solid point...

I also don't think anybody would be willing to play for any kind of developmental league...

But I could see the UFL trying to work it out where 18 year old players could play there for a year and then go to college.

It would be good for the UFL and probably good for the colleges. And the fact that UFL is a "pro" league is pretty much a moot point anymore.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter