Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:31 am to AUnite
quote:
I liked Bella's idea from yesterday: lock all those people in a room (or building, maybe even put them on a remote island) and let them work it out amongst themselves
Just ban their asses. There's a reason certain message boards get a reputation for having tin-foil sporting, psycho bastards. Tigerdroppings hadn't been one for the longest time.
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:32 am to parkjas2001
Hope so...
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:37 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
There's a reason certain message boards get a reputation for having tin-foil sporting, psycho bastards.
I avoid those message boards. They scare me. quote:
Tigerdroppings hadn't been one for the longest time.
I'll have to take your word on this. I didn't get approved till November, so it's been a constant gang-bang on Auburn since I arrived.
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:39 am to WDE24
Has the SEC said anything about including the same language in it's bylaws?
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:41 am to AUnite
quote:
constant gang-bang on Auburn
That is why you're a fan of TD? gang bangs?
ETA: you knows I jokin'.
This post was edited on 7/27/11 at 9:44 am
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:41 am to Lg
quote:
Has the SEC said anything about including the same language in it's bylaws?
I dont think it would matter
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:46 am to WDE24
quote:
Well, Ice should take out the posters flaming, such as Hog and Crimnsonsaint and Itsme and IronTiger and Wild Thang, etc. They've been warned and people will get the message if the posters that flame AU get banned. Unfortunately, only the Aubs that whine about the flamers have been getting banned, so other fans don't feel the pressure. Let a few of them go and things will get straitened out.
THIS x1000000
The Cam Newton saga precipitated this and the ATPB thread exacerbated it.
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:47 am to UASports23
quote:
That is why you're a fan of TD? gang bangs?
oh yeah, you know me! Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:49 am to Aubie Spr96
To get back on topic....It was really dumb NOT to have this "loophole" closed to begin with.
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:49 am to AUnite
quote:
oh yeah, you know me!
I knew it. I'm smart.
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:50 am to parkjas2001
quote:
They better be damn tight on the language here.
What would stop me from going up to Alabama and asking for money on behalf of every recruit they sign, then?
AMEN
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:50 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
quote:
Has the SEC said anything about including the same language in it's bylaws?
I dont think it would matter
Then why have their own bylaws? Just seems to me, the SEC could have declared Cam ineligible according to their own bylaw but didn't have the guts to stand on it. If they would have, would we be talking about all of this right now?
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:52 am to Lg
quote:
Then why have their own bylaws?
To go above and beyond the basic NCAA bylaws
quote:
according to their own bylaw but didn't have the guts to stand on it
if this is the bylaw I think you are refering to, they have not used it on several prominent players as well as Cam. Slive has already commented on this
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:52 am to UASports23
quote:
It was really dumb NOT to have this "loophole" closed to begin with.
I agree. I don't think they could have predicted this case though. At least they closed it after one occurrence instead of multiple occurrences.
quote:
I knew it. I'm smart.
Yes sir, you are
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:53 am to UASports23
quote:Maybe, but it is kind of a strange scenario.
.It was really dumb NOT to have this "loophole" closed to begin with.
Assume for a moment we aren't talking about Cam specifically, but a random player in the future. If a parent or uncle or something attempts to receive pay for play from one school and is rejected and the kid goes to another school (or even the school to which the solicitation was made) and never gets an extra penny, why should the kid be ineligible. Especially if the kid was not aware of what his parent or uncle was doing or if the kid just didn't have the ability to stop the parent, uncle etc. from doing it.
This post was edited on 7/27/11 at 9:54 am
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:54 am to Lg
quote:I don't think Bama fans (or any SEC fans) would be happy about this by-law being applied evenly across the board.
Just seems to me, the SEC could have declared Cam ineligible according to their own bylaw but didn't have the guts to stand on it.
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:55 am to WDE24
But parents asking for money, isn't strange. . i'm sure that happens a shite ton in college athletics. The only thing is that this is going to clog the frick out of the NCAA w/ investigations n etc.
I should apply.
I should apply.
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:58 am to UASports23
Posted on 7/27/11 at 9:59 am to UASports23
quote:
But parents asking for money, isn't strange. . i'm sure that happens a shite ton in college athletics.
There is no doubt about this.
Page 4 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News