Started By
Message
re: NCAA commissions task force to separate big money boosters from NIL deals
Posted on 5/3/22 at 5:49 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Posted on 5/3/22 at 5:49 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Yella Fella and Lowder showed them the way.
0
Posted on 5/3/22 at 5:49 pm to RollTide1987
College football is so fricked.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 5:53 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
And that is a distinction without a difference. It is practically impossible to prove any kind of violation. The fact that a kid got paid is irrelevant. You have to go down all sorts of rabbit trails to prove that shite in it ain't happening. Especially not against somebody with some fricking money like Aggy.
I get it. You are frustrated because the under-the-table fiefdom is now not exclusive. This is what would've happened had there been no NCAA Aggy's arse forever.
Welcome to the new reality.
They have to report the contracts to the university and the NCAA. The only way to hide it would be to funnel the money through non-boosters with legitimate NIL needs.
Your reaction is just because you know you are guilty. It's not my fault your boosters are stupid.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 5:56 pm to 3down10
Yes, the contracts are recorded. The University isn't involved with the process other than to record the contracts. Like I said, good luck to the NCAA in their upcoming legal battles
This post was edited on 5/3/22 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 5/3/22 at 5:58 pm to 3down10
We'll see.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:01 pm to ColoradoAg
quote:
Yes, the contracts are recorded. The University isn't involved when the process other than to record the contracts. Like I said, good luck to the NCAA in their upcoming legal battles
The idea that the boosters are going to sue the NCAA is really kind of funny to me. It makes me wonder if you really understand what the NCAA is.
The NCAA is just made up of it's member schools. So boosters suing the NCAA is kind of like boosters suing their schools.
Everything with the NCAA is basically voluntary. The schools agree to these things. There is no real legal authority to the NCAA, however the punishments and such they hand out are extremely real. Because the schools accept that.
If the schools no longer wish to be part of that process, then they can just leave. Or they can work to make the rules whatever they want. The schools are the influence behind these things. And it's done for competitive reasons, which you apparently do not want to have.
Boosters who go against it will be disassociated from the programs, etc.
So what the frick are these lawsuits you think are going to happen? What is the basis of them? Because it sounds to me like a bunch of Texas talk, aka bullshite.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:05 pm to 3down10
Look, I hate the sips with everything I am. But if you do not think they had legal teams (pretty decent law school) go over everything I don't know what to tell you
How do you disassociate boosters from NIL? Most businesses that sign these contracts would be run by former alumni. How do you keep a website from paying for exclusive interviews? Most of their subscribers are alumni as well. Like I said, good luck with trying to close Pandora's box
Let's not even get into the transfer portal where NIL REALLY starts to take off
How do you disassociate boosters from NIL? Most businesses that sign these contracts would be run by former alumni. How do you keep a website from paying for exclusive interviews? Most of their subscribers are alumni as well. Like I said, good luck with trying to close Pandora's box
Let's not even get into the transfer portal where NIL REALLY starts to take off
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:08 pm to 3down10
quote:
The idea that the boosters are going to sue the NCAA is really kind of funny to me. It makes me wonder if you really understand what the NCAA is.
The NCAA is just made up of it's member schools. So boosters suing the NCAA is kind of like boosters suing their schools.
Everything with the NCAA is basically voluntary. The schools agree to these things. There is no real legal authority to the NCAA, however the punishments and such they hand out are extremely real. Because the schools accept that.
If the schools no longer wish to be part of that process, then they can just leave. Or they can work to make the rules whatever they want. The schools are the influence behind these things. And it's done for competitive reasons, which you apparently do not want to have.
Boosters who go against it will be disassociated from the programs, etc.
So what the frick are these lawsuits you think are going to happen? What is the basis of them? Because it sounds to me like a bunch of Texas talk, aka bullshi
This is a post by somebody NOT mad that Bama's exclusive fiefdom is coming to an end.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:09 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
This is a post by somebody NOT mad that Bama's exclusive fiefdom is coming to an end.
This will surely save you.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:11 pm to 3down10
I hope I live until 2052 to find out.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:16 pm to ColoradoAg
quote:
Look, I hate the sips with everything I am. But if you do not think they had legal teams (pretty decent law school) go over everything I don't know what to tell you
How do you disassociate boosters from NIL? Most businesses that sign these contracts would be run by former alumni. How do you keep a website from paying for exclusive interviews? Most of their subscribers are alumni as well. Like I said, good luck with trying to close Pandora's box
Let's not even get into the transfer portal where NIL REALLY starts to take off
Well, is the website run by boosters? If so, they can't do NIL. See, not that hard.
You can have as many boosters subscribed to a business as you want, that's fine. Subscribers doesn't matter, and is in fact - kind of the point of NIL. I mean if I'm Burger King and I pay for Bryce Young NIL, I'm using him a bit heavier in Alabama than I am in other areas.
Why do you think it will be hard to tell if an offer is legit or not?
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:19 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
I hope I live until 2052 to find out.
You might can get a cheap ticket from Ole Miss or LSU fans.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:20 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
There goes A&M's class.
Texas A&M accepts the hate.
BTW we ain't done yet, and we ain't scared of lawsuits. Plenty of legal resources on our side. We will get another #1 class soon, book it. Jimbo said it in so few words last week.
This whole NCAA NIL task force smells like Bama and Nicky are pulling levers to ease their pain. Sorry Gumps, dynasty is over.
Good luck catching up to us. Game on.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:26 pm to TouchdownTony
quote:
You mean Like Will Wade was doing.
Yes
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:27 pm to CCTider
quote:
Are y'all gonna go back to stealing money from cancer kids?
I never stole anything.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:37 pm to 3down10
The people who don’t understand that there will be a workaround by the time the ink on the rule is dry are the same people who legitimately thought NIL was going to be limited to players running ads in the school paper for the bookstore and monetizing tik toks.
This post was edited on 5/3/22 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:40 pm to spettro
quote:Yes, we do. We signed the number one class and promptly announced $200M in upgrades right after doing so. A&M just don't give a frick anymore.
Texas A&M accepts the hate.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:45 pm to ColoradoAg
When have they ever given a “frick” about anything except doing vulgar things they call traditions and yapping about how much money they have.
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:46 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Your school did
Posted on 5/3/22 at 6:49 pm to StringedInstruments
quote:you look at who is involved in the collective, and if it's boosters they can't do it. Pretty easy
How do they distinguish between a collective and a legitimate organization?
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News