Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Looks like a few schools will have to adjust their roster....

Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:42 am
Posted by blacroix
Member since Sep 2019
576 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:42 am
LINK

NCAA changes rules yet again.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 9:44 am
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75300 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:44 am to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


It becomes clearer every day that the people running this conference and the NCAA are incompetent.

The SEC rushed to publish their new rule, but forgot to clearly define the parties affected, and now the NCAA is drawing their lines somewhere else.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 10:04 am
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
22278 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:45 am to
It is nice to understand the left and right limits. Helps everyone understand the "rules."
Posted by dhuck20
SCLSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
23349 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:02 am to
Link to the actual rule or a logical explanation of how their argument is a “change”? How many teams would have to change their roster based on having teams that attend mini-camp?
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18781 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:08 am to
And some here want to defend these absolute frick ups
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
54289 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:09 am to
That precedent has been there for decades.

No slippage after all.

Boom!!
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78365 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:09 am to
quote:

How many teams would have to change their roster based on having teams that attend mini-camp?
Multiple SEC teams will.

The argument on here the last few days has been “but they didn’t sign a contract”.

The line, apparently, as it should be, is being involved with any aspect of the NFL.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
110829 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:11 am to
quote:

dhuck20

That avi is fantastic!
Posted by SEC Doctor
Member since Aug 2024
12759 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:14 am to
So Sankey and the SEC are in direct violation of NCAA rules by allowing players who participated in NFL minicamp.

Sounds like a lack of institutional control.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
33453 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:15 am to
This has so many of the retards here very angry
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
19642 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:15 am to
quote:

So Sankey and the SEC are in direct violation of NCAA rules by allowing players who participated in NFL minicamp.

We already know he didn't read the rule book.
Posted by SEC Doctor
Member since Aug 2024
12759 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:16 am to
quote:

This has so many of the retards here very angry


So many of them were trying to make a distinction between guys who participated with NFL teams in minicamp and guys who participated with NFL teams in training camp.

Bunch of morons, and Sankey is one of them.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
74236 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:17 am to
quote:

NCAA changes rules yet again.

The NCAA never said it was ok for class of 2022 guys to return in general, nor did they say mini-camp players were ok. Hutson only was able to be rostered because of a TRO he got. The NCAA never cleared him to play on their own. I think you may be misunderstanding the arguments presented online as to the difference in a mini-camp player or player who was signed as an UDFA. The NCAA, to my knowledge, has never said it made a difference. They explicitly excluded 2022 athletes in the 5 for 5 rule period, pro athlete or otherwise, which is why everyone sued them.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86717 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:19 am to
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
54289 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:25 am to
Dude your brand is Angel Reese
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
75300 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:29 am to
quote:

The NCAA never said it was ok for class of 2022 guys to return in general, nor did they say mini-camp players were ok. Hutson only was able to be rostered because of a TRO he got. The NCAA never cleared him to play on their own. I think you may be misunderstanding the arguments presented online as to the difference in a mini-camp player or player who was signed as an UDFA. The NCAA, to my knowledge, has never said it made a difference. They explicitly excluded 2022 athletes in the 5 for 5 rule period, pro athlete or otherwise, which is why everyone sued them.


This is true, and makes everyone with an mini camp roster player or 2022 player, guilty of violating SEC Bylaw 14.01.01 by way of the NCAA rules, which is what the SEC is alleging Lane did by allegedly recruiting pro players.

Crickets on that though.
Posted by GrizzlyWintergreen
Member since Jun 2025
2809 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Dude your brand is Angel Reese


Actually its what he just posted. Those are factual numbers
Posted by LsuNav
Sacramento
Member since Mar 2008
2372 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:32 am to
Just give all the kids from 2022 five years… regardless of pro status. It is the only way to avoid a string of lawsuits. After this year make the rule that any NFL participation disqualifies further college eligibility.
Posted by DeplorableTerrorizer
Member since Nov 2025
480 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:33 am to
quote:

It is nice to understand the left and right limits. Helps everyone understand the "rules


The *rules* are whatever the hell the next lawyer says they are in court. Everyone is just supposed to nod and accept it as if thats been the rule all along.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter