Started By
Message
re: List of Sports your school has won a natty
Posted on 12/18/22 at 12:07 pm to scrooster
Posted on 12/18/22 at 12:07 pm to scrooster
quote:
of Texas has enjoyed better seedings in many sports because of their dominance in the Big 8. You'll not enjoy those same ncaa seedings a couple of years from now imho. My Mother is a Texan so that has always made me half Texan ...
The other half must be full of caca.’l
0
Posted on 12/18/22 at 12:22 pm to Jumpinjack
quote:
I love how Bama has your panties twisted on a beautiful Sunday morning.
No, you have your panties twisted because I called out your bullshite claims. What an insecure bunch of bandwagon riders.
This post was edited on 12/18/22 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 12/18/22 at 12:30 pm to MOS0311
Poor insecure bastard wrote a novel and I can shoot it down in a few paragraphs.
1925 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with Dartmouth. Who awarded the NC? Houlgate and Helms. Houlgate started his system in 1927. So Bama won their 1925 NC using a formula that didn’t exist until 1927? Helms Athletic Foundation started in 1941. Another incredible retroactive NC.
1926 National Championship- Alabama claims they share this one with 3 other teams with equal or better records! Once again it is the Helms Athletic Foundation in 1941 that awards it!
1930 National Championship- The Davis poll says that Bama tied Notre Dame for NC this year. This was the only one to award it to Bama. Notre Dame was named NC in 6 polls! Parke Davis is another retroactive system! He (an individual, not an organization) did his in 1933!
One guy in 1933 said you were the NC in 1926..you insecure asswipes ran with it.
1934 National Championship- Alabama says they share this with two other teams. The awarders are Dunkel, Williamson, and Football Thesaurus. Dunkel was an individual who came up with his own system. Williamson was a geologist who came up with his own system. Football Thesaurus first appeared in 1946!
1941 National Championship- This is a complete joke. The AP ranked Alabama 20th in the nation with 14 teams with better records in the top 20. Once again it is the Football Thesaurus that retroactively awards it. Alabama finished 3rd in the SEC that year. Mississippi State won the SEC title..yet Bama claims a National title!
Posted on 12/18/22 at 12:32 pm to TValley
Bama has more titles than your school. Sorry.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 12:37 pm to Yaz 8
quote:WRONG!!!!
Bama has more titles than your school. Sorry.
Bama claims these.
quote:
Dunkel was an individual who came up with his own system. Williamson was a geologist who came up with his own system.
I have developed my own system. I have awarded Auburn, Georgia, Florida, LSU, and Tennesseee 19 National Championships.
Bama is behind.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 1:28 pm to TValley
So you get your little gay, inbred arse handed to you over the AP/UPI title debate and thus, you resort to failed attempts at nit picking those 20s and 30s titles to save face? While sounding like an utter unabashed hypocrite in the process? Lmao.
Too bad in that era, the Rose Bowl was the de facto national championship game - hence the articles I posted from each of those individual years proving Alabama was named "national champs"... long before those "retroactive polls" you tried listing came into play. That probably explains why Alabama doesn't claim the 1937 title, despite finishing 8-0-1 (and getting screwed out of a Rose Bowl appearance) while Minnesota finished 7-1.
And using your own "better record" logic against you in which you argued to delegitimize other Bama titles, in 1925 Alabama finished with a 10-0 record while Darmouth finished 8-0. In 1930, Notre Dame and Alabama finished 10-0 with Alabama having the Rose Bowl win. But you're cool with Notre Dame claiming this one? And in 1934, Alabama finished 10-0 while Minnesota was 8-0...
Since you seem to value "better records" so much by using that argument against some of Alabama's later titles, then why do you have an issue with these, little dick man?
And again, this is your only legit argument. Pat yourself on the back, guy! 1 out of 18 is pretty impressive!
But I'd also like for you to prove that your motives aren't based on little dick syndrome by also questioning Kentucky's 1950 title, despite finishing 7th in the AP. Or Tennessee's 1940 title despite finishing 4th in the AP and Tennessee's 1938 title despite finishing 2nd in the AP. Or Georgia's 1942 title despite finishing 2nd in the AP. Or Illinois' 1951 title despite finishing 5th in the AP. Or USC's 1939 title despite finishing 3rd in the AP. Or Pitt's 1936 title despite finishing 3rd in the AP.
Also, if you weren't motivated by little dick syndrome, you'd be equally as outraged over Alabama getting hosed in 1945, 1966 and 1977.
Cope, little man, cope...
Too bad in that era, the Rose Bowl was the de facto national championship game - hence the articles I posted from each of those individual years proving Alabama was named "national champs"... long before those "retroactive polls" you tried listing came into play. That probably explains why Alabama doesn't claim the 1937 title, despite finishing 8-0-1 (and getting screwed out of a Rose Bowl appearance) while Minnesota finished 7-1.
And using your own "better record" logic against you in which you argued to delegitimize other Bama titles, in 1925 Alabama finished with a 10-0 record while Darmouth finished 8-0. In 1930, Notre Dame and Alabama finished 10-0 with Alabama having the Rose Bowl win. But you're cool with Notre Dame claiming this one? And in 1934, Alabama finished 10-0 while Minnesota was 8-0...
Since you seem to value "better records" so much by using that argument against some of Alabama's later titles, then why do you have an issue with these, little dick man?
quote:
1941 National Championship- This is a complete joke.
And again, this is your only legit argument. Pat yourself on the back, guy! 1 out of 18 is pretty impressive!
But I'd also like for you to prove that your motives aren't based on little dick syndrome by also questioning Kentucky's 1950 title, despite finishing 7th in the AP. Or Tennessee's 1940 title despite finishing 4th in the AP and Tennessee's 1938 title despite finishing 2nd in the AP. Or Georgia's 1942 title despite finishing 2nd in the AP. Or Illinois' 1951 title despite finishing 5th in the AP. Or USC's 1939 title despite finishing 3rd in the AP. Or Pitt's 1936 title despite finishing 3rd in the AP.
Also, if you weren't motivated by little dick syndrome, you'd be equally as outraged over Alabama getting hosed in 1945, 1966 and 1977.
Cope, little man, cope...
Posted on 12/18/22 at 1:33 pm to TValley
quote:
I have developed my own system. I have awarded Auburn, Georgia, Florida, LSU, and Tennesseee 19 National Championships.
Well, you're going to be shocked to discover Auburn didn't play in a bowl game in 1957 which according to your logic, automatically deligitimizes said title.
And since you're so outraged over Alabama's 1941 title, wait until you hear about Tennessee's 1938 and 1940 titles and where they finished ranked in the AP. Or where UGA finished ranked the year of their 1942 title claim...
This post was edited on 12/18/22 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 12/18/22 at 2:08 pm to MOS0311
quote:
Well, you're going to be shocked to discover Auburn didn't play in a bowl game in 1957 which according to your logic, automatically deligitimizes said title.
Alabama can make up shite...so can everyone else.
"We're Alabama...only we are allowed to make up championships out of thin air.
This was the comment I replied to originally.
quote:
Alabama only counts NC won on the field.
What about those years where the co-champion beat you ON THE FIELD?
Posted on 12/18/22 at 2:23 pm to MOS0311
quote:
Also, if you weren't motivated by little dick syndrome, you'd be equally as outraged over Alabama getting hosed in 1945, 1966 and 1977.
Ok, Napoleon complex isn't known as " little dick syndrome " .
( It was kinda funny though)
Posted on 12/18/22 at 2:46 pm to MOS0311
UGA was the consensus NC in 1942, they won nearly 2/3 of recognized polls and won the Rose Bowl, as you said the deFacto NC game.
I think UGA should claim 1946 when they were the only undefeated untied team in the country.
They were also clearly the best team in 1927 and would have finished the unanimous number 1 if not for GT’s cheating arse.
I think UGA should claim 1946 when they were the only undefeated untied team in the country.
They were also clearly the best team in 1927 and would have finished the unanimous number 1 if not for GT’s cheating arse.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 3:07 pm to MOS0311
quote:Let me lay it out for you, you inbred punk. In 1983 Bama claimed 6. They only had 2, but for the sake of debate we'll let your stupid, punk arse claim 6.
So you get your little gay, inbred arse handed to you
Since 1983 Bama has 7 legitimate titles. 7+6=18?
Explain that, you stupid inbred. Where did you get the extra 5?
Here, you idiot. From the Bama media guide in 1983.
This post was edited on 12/18/22 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 12/18/22 at 3:35 pm to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
They were also clearly the best team in 1927 and would have finished the unanimous number 1 if not for GT’s cheating arse
Soaked the field and it led to the construction of Sanford Stadium.
quote:
those early years of football, Georgia played a series of controversial games against in-state rival Georgia Tech. Sanford Field was too small to accommodate the large crowds, forcing Georgia to travel to Tech's Grant Field in Atlanta every year. Sanford wanted Georgia to have a venue that would equal Tech's, and the "final straw" came in 1927 when UGA's undefeated (9–0) team traveled to Tech and lost 12–0. It was alleged that Tech watered the field all night to slow UGA's running backs. Afterwards, Sanford vowed to "build a stadium bigger than Tech", and play the game at Athens every other year.[citation needed]
Posted on 12/18/22 at 3:40 pm to TValley
quote:
TValley
Try to avoid threatening to kill on here gain, SOJ.
Posted on 12/18/22 at 5:31 pm to TValley
Who the frick are you calling an inbred, you boomer redneck piece of shite? I guaran-goddamn-tee you I'm better looking than you; younger than you; I'm in vastly superior physical shape compared to you; my stamina is off the charts compared to yours; I have more money than you; I eat healthier than you and I could easily frick your wife if I wanted to. But you're probably the only desperate sap willing to give your sister a ride... The only category you have me topped in is morbid obesity.
And I know you're a dumb fricking boomer based on your gay arse boomer-esque terminology.
Now, let me spell this out for you, yet again because you keep moving the goal posts and endlessly contradicting yourself to avoid humiliation. And next time when wisdom chases you, don't outrun it, you goat fricking, little dick syndrome suffering bitch...
It's sad that one college football program's accomplishments have driven you half-retarded. And the sheer fact that you blatantly turn a blind eye to more egregiously controversial claims made by other teams further proves my point: you're a bitch suffering from little man's syndrome.
This post was edited on 12/18/22 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 12/18/22 at 6:25 pm to bigDgator
quote:
bigDgator
Most of what you listed aren’t even sports
Posted on 12/18/22 at 6:35 pm to MOS0311
quote:You. I am also calling you a punk bitch.
Who the frick are you calling an inbred, you boomer redneck piece of shite?
quote:You snaggle-toothed cocksucker. In your dreams.
I guaran-goddamn-tee you I'm better looking than you; younger than you; I'm in vastly superior physical shape compared to you; my stamina is off the charts compared to yours
I can out-run, out-frick, and out-fight your punk arse on a bad day.
quote:That is a sure mark of a broke son of a bitch. Online hollering "I have money". Sorry, you inbred shithead. We all know the sawmill doesn't pay that well.
I have more money than you;
quote:My wife likes men. You don't qualify.
I could easily frick your wife if I wanted to.
quote:Let me spell this out for you. You're a fricking punk. A keyboard warrior.
And I know you're a dumb fricking boomer based on your gay arse boomer-esque terminology.
The only thing your failure of a fricking man has, is a football team at a school you never attended.
You're a punk and a loser. Got 18? No, an neither does team you try to claim.
Sit down and shut up, you pussy arse bitch.
This post was edited on 12/18/22 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 12/18/22 at 6:54 pm to TValley
Texas National Championships
Baseball
Football
Men's Golf
Men's Indoor Track and Field
Men's Swimming and Diving
Men's Tennis
Women's Basketball
Women's Cross Country
Women's Swimming and Diving
Rowing
Women's Tennis
Women's Indoor Track and Field
Women's Outdoor Track and Field
Volleyball (most recent, last night)
Baseball
Football
Men's Golf
Men's Indoor Track and Field
Men's Swimming and Diving
Men's Tennis
Women's Basketball
Women's Cross Country
Women's Swimming and Diving
Rowing
Women's Tennis
Women's Indoor Track and Field
Women's Outdoor Track and Field
Volleyball (most recent, last night)
Posted on 12/18/22 at 8:05 pm to bigDgator
To the origin of this thread, Florida has won the big 3 in the last 20 years and no one else can say that. Nothing wrong with bragging about this accomplishment.
Timing my have been had because they were about to get humiliated by a northwest team in football but still an amazing accomplishment.
Timing my have been had because they were about to get humiliated by a northwest team in football but still an amazing accomplishment.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:38 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
Try to avoid threatening to kill on here gain, SOJ.
He's so Psycho.......
Ray !
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:42 pm to Gnash
quote:
LSU has 49 total
quote:
Men’s Boxing (1)
Wait - theres a mens boxing national title?
Wish I knew that when I was in school, would've gotten us another one
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News