Started By
Message
re: Imminent collapse of the Tiny 12
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:24 pm to bamawriter
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:24 pm to bamawriter
quote:
I see even less benefit to Iowa St in the Big 10.
At least there is some geographical relevance, unlike KSU > PAC.
Over the years here & there, ISU's been good at both football and basketball. And they're an AAU member since the 50's.
1
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:25 pm to Montezuma
quote:furthermore, why wouldn’t they want Baylor or TCU?
Why would the PAC want KState?
Seems like access to the Texas TV market would be things the big10 and pac want.
I don’t know crap tho.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:25 pm to BigRedNewKingOfSEC
quote:
Sigh I wish OU was going to the Big10 or PAC12...oh well
Can you please frick off with this schtick
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:26 pm to Wildcat1996
Hahahaha. It's no different then when y'all left. You saw the writing on the wall and wanted out. Unfortunately, OU tied their boat to Texas and 10 years plus later, here we are. Stop acting like you did any different or spoke any different of the Big XII on your way out. You're pissy because you have to deal with Texas again.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:27 pm to Naked Bootleg
quote:Nope.
Can you please frick off with this schtick
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:27 pm to Wildcat1996
quote:
Wildcat1996
Tech has better academic standards than OU and better athletics than either Kansas school
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:29 pm to dstone12
quote:
furthermore, why wouldn’t they want Baylor or TCU?
I think it's a bunch of rumor mongering bologna. It makes 0 financial sense for the B1G to take kU and Iowa State.
They don't bring enough revenue and the current members of the conference have no interest in splitting it two more times.
Also, why in the hell would the PAC want to K-state or Oklahoma State for that matter?
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:30 pm to BigRedNewKingOfSEC
quote:
Nope.
Dude. You're on a SEC board with SEC in your username.. constantly bitching about being in the SEC. It's pointless. Not funny, nobody's melting, etc. I'm just trying to help but go on if you must.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:30 pm to mizslu314
quote:
Footprint, and small share of KC market.
I thought the Kansas Jayhawks owned all of the KC market?
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:31 pm to Wildcat1996
That's all good and well but I would think they would join the PAC-12.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:32 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Tech has better academic standards than OU and better athletics than either Kansas school
Agreed. None of them offer anything of real value.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:32 pm to OilfieldSooner
None of those things are happening. The Big 12 will add a few schools and try to make Texas' and OU's exits as difficult and expensive as possible. Then they will fade into the obscurity of a G6 conference and compete with the AAC and MWC.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:33 pm to dstone12
quote:
furthermore, why wouldn’t they want Baylor or TCU?
Private religious based (I know) schools in Cali sports? That’s a hard sell.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:34 pm to Tiger_Claw
Denial
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:34 pm to Smokeyone
Hey —
I’m not going to sit here and claim OU is some academic powerhouse, but for you to say Tech has higher standards is complete nonsense.
I’m not going to sit here and claim OU is some academic powerhouse, but for you to say Tech has higher standards is complete nonsense.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:34 pm to KingofTexas
Bowlsby said the Big 12's TV deal ($250M/yr.) is 50% OU/Texas. So, the others = $125M.
TV deals are 80% football. So, rest of Big 12 hoops = $25M.
That's 1/2 what the B1G makes in TV *per school.*
If the Big Ten is going to do anything, it will have to be a school that adds more than $60M a year in TV value. BBall alone doesn't do that.
Rutgers and Maryland snuck in before cord cutting. Decisions aren't being made today for cable households.
TV deals are 80% football. So, rest of Big 12 hoops = $25M.
That's 1/2 what the B1G makes in TV *per school.*
If the Big Ten is going to do anything, it will have to be a school that adds more than $60M a year in TV value. BBall alone doesn't do that.
Rutgers and Maryland snuck in before cord cutting. Decisions aren't being made today for cable households.
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:35 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Tech has better academic standards than OU and better athletics than either Kansas school
Almost none of that is true.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:38 pm to Jrv2damac
quote:
Denial
I'll absolutely eat crow if the B1G invites kU. That being said, there is now way it happens. You just don't bring enough $$$$$ to the table.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:39 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Tech has better academic standards than OU and better athletics than either Kansas school
Silly. Reality there have been questions over the last 20 years of TT keeping their accreditation. I could provide you some real differences, but probably a waist of characters.
Posted on 8/24/21 at 1:44 pm to OilfieldSooner
quote:
Hahahaha. It's no different then when y'all left. You saw the writing on the wall and wanted out. Unfortunately, OU tied their boat to Texas and 10 years plus later, here we are. Stop acting like you did any different or spoke any different of the Big XII on your way out. You're pissy because you have to deal with Texas again.
It's totally different. We left on our own terms.
You tied your boat Texas 10 years ago. And you're still tied to them today. OU is the most pathetic lackey program in college football, and the sad part is the program that makes all your business decisions for you isn't even in your own state.
EVERYTHING we did was different when we left. And it's why we're better than you today, and will remain better than you going forward.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News