Started By
Message
I'm leaning towards Lane on this particular issue
Posted on 8/30/26 at 11:29 am
Posted on 8/30/26 at 11:29 am
I'm simply putting myself in the shoes of a 2022 graduate who is being denied an opportunity that all others have now, will have in the future and did have in the years leading up to this bullshite. Why is Sanky drawing the line at this particular issue?
"We don't want pros in the SEC." That ship sailed long ago, and they are not NFL players if they don't make the team. This is no different than the Covid extra year bullshite, but this bullshite has an expiration date after this season.
Unfortunately, lawyers and judges don't have expiration dates, so I'm sure there'll be more courtroom drama down the road.
"We don't want pros in the SEC." That ship sailed long ago, and they are not NFL players if they don't make the team. This is no different than the Covid extra year bullshite, but this bullshite has an expiration date after this season.
Unfortunately, lawyers and judges don't have expiration dates, so I'm sure there'll be more courtroom drama down the road.
1
Posted on 8/30/26 at 11:34 am to Faurot fodder
Sankey set the precedent by ignoring the NCAA and following the courts’ decisions for Pavia and Chambliss.
His bed has been made ever since.
His bed has been made ever since.
Posted on 8/30/26 at 11:36 am to NFLSU
quote:
Sankey set the precedent by ignoring the NCAA and following the courts’ decisions for Pavia and Chambliss. His bed has been made ever since.
Yep. Sankey had a chance to get tough on this from the start and he failed to do so. Now it’s Pandora’s Box and he just got stuffed in a locker.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News