Started By
Message
re: If Mich State beats Bama
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:03 am to CrunchimustheMax
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:03 am to CrunchimustheMax
quote:
His offenses were lethal with top tier talent.
Heck my offense would be lethal with top talent. Anybody's would.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:19 am to CrunchimustheMax
quote:
Anyone can recruit well at Bama.
Shula couldn't.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:28 am to tigerfan in bamaland
this guy obviously had a bad dream and Saban was at the center of it......a nightmare before Christmas if you will.....
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:28 am to CrunchimustheMax
quote:
Spurrier had to compete with annual elite UT and FSU teams....Bama has had LSU thus far....
You're not very smart. The SEC of the last ten years, top to bottom, is light years ahead of the SEC in the 90's.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:31 am to CrunchimustheMax
How many times did UT beat Spurrier during this epic period?
And, combine the FSU & UF titles from then and Saban wins.
Your turn.
And, combine the FSU & UF titles from then and Saban wins.
Your turn.
This post was edited on 12/25/15 at 10:32 am
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:33 am to nc14
I don't think the results of any ONE game says anything about a coach. I will think Saban is one of the top coaches in the game.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:37 am to nc14
quote:
How many championships did Spurrier win with all that talent while dominating the SEC?
Spurrier dominated the SEC to a greater extent than Saban has. And Spurrier did it at a time when the East had very strong UGA and UT programs, and the SEC was not the premier conference at that time. He had to do it during years when UT, UGA, LSU, and Auburn were all top-10 teams. Also the national championship had to route through the state of Florida due to UF, FSU, and Miami all being elite. And, both Michigan and Ohio State were legit, and Nebraska was at its zenith.
Only LSU in 2011 was a comparable national title opponent to those in contention back in the 90s. Of course, it's LSU, so they tend to wilt against Bama. Texas in 09 would have been blasted by UF and a few others. Cincinnati was even money against that Texas team. Notre Dame was a joke. Everyone knows that. That game was over after the first five plays.
Bama fans should just be happy about their success, and not attempt ridiculous statements like Saban being more dominant than Spurrier was. Saban better rattle off about 4 more SEC titles before that talk is legit.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:42 am to CrunchimustheMax
OP must have found a sizeable package of weed under his tree this morning.
This post was edited on 12/25/15 at 11:06 am
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:49 am to sullivanct19a
quote:
attempt ridiculous statements like Saban being more dominant than Spurrier was. Saban better rattle off about 4 more SEC titles before that talk
I rest my case. This Sullivan character claimed that I embarrass myself on this board? Pot meet kettle. This guy is up there with Robert the tool Goulet as worst poster. Oh, lest I forget that nuisance Road gator. Smack him on the snout and he'll go back to his corner.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:51 am to CrunchimustheMax
quote:
What does that say about Saban?
It would say more about Dantonio. He's one of the 5 best coaches in college football right now.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:52 am to sullivanct19a
quote:
Spurrier dominated the SEC to a greater extent than Saban has. And Spurrier did it at a time when the East had very strong UGA and UT programs
Georgia mostly sucked when Spurrier was at Florida. The only good teams UGA had when he was there were 1992 and 1997. The 1992 team had Goff on the sidelines to cancel out all the talent on the field and the 1997 team beat UF like a rented mule.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 10:53 am to CrunchimustheMax
Anyone can recruit if the rules aren't applied... He can not win without superior recruits; even talent and he loses everytime....
Posted on 12/25/15 at 11:23 am to CrunchimustheMax
Recruiting rankings are about as real as Santa Claus.Its only fitting the off season champions of the world would cite recruiting rankings as a reason a team should win. How many wins did Tennessee amass with its multiple top 5 classes over the last decade or so? What about Texas or USC?
Posted on 12/25/15 at 11:26 am to CrunchimustheMax
quote:
Butch is coming for your over hyped coach...already made Spurrier quit and was key in Richt being fired this year.
Carolina got rid of the drunk Majors and Tannyhill torpedoed the fat man.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 11:41 am to Luke
quote:So let me get this right....
Anyone can recruit if the rules aren't applied... He can not win without superior recruits; even talent and he loses everytime....
1) Alabama cheats at recruiting, and...
2) therefore, Alabama most often is the best team, but..
3) if Saban/Alabama didn't recruit the best, then they'd lose everytime to an equally or more talented team.
have I got this right?
Posted on 12/25/15 at 11:44 am to BhamDore
quote:Oh lawd
Recruiting rankings are about as real as Santa Clause

Posted on 12/25/15 at 11:50 am to CrunchimustheMax
Certain posters on this board have basically turned into caricatures of themselves due to Saban's dominance. The OP is a prime, and sad, example.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 11:51 am to CrunchimustheMax
I'm curious about this too. Saban might not be good under a playoff format.
Posted on 12/25/15 at 11:54 am to Ancient Astronaut
quote:At least we'll get to know if he's not....some folks will never know about their coach.
I'm curious about this too. Saban might not be good under a playoff format.

Posted on 12/25/15 at 12:05 pm to CrunchimustheMax
I think there is a decent chance they can lose this game. Michigan state is a very solid team and a great QB. We will see
Popular
Back to top
