Started By
Message

re: I-14 (14th Amendment HWY)—TX, LA, MS, AL, GA corridor—approved by US Senate

Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:39 am to
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30463 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:39 am to
quote:

Hwy 30 leaving college station would just be renamed I-14?




Wow you’re dumb.

Yes. That’s how state and fed govco does this thing called, making interstates.

Your highway 30 will have 4 or more lanes slapped beside or on top of it and be “renamed” I-14.

They won’t break up the name of an interstate from Odessa to Augusta so daniel can find his way to the Huntsville Sonic.

You’ll just have to adapt.




Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:39 am to
quote:

The portion that would go through Alabama is essentially US 80.
It is probably the least traveled US highway in the entire state.
Would be a useless interstate for most Alabamians



(a) The point of it is to connect military installations that now have no easy wide route

(b) Highway 80 isn't widely used by individuals, but it is very used by industry. Especially timber and agriculture.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 7:40 am
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62875 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:43 am to
You ever travel US 80? It's sparsely traveled. I'm not saying zero people or industry uses it.
But just do an analysis of other highways around the state. I guarantee every other US route gets more traffic with the possible exception of portions of 431 through East central Alabama.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 7:44 am
Posted by Pledge
Professional Baw
Member since Sep 2015
1121 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Would be a useless interstate for most Alabamians



Toothpaste is also useless to most Alabamians, who cares
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65916 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:44 am to
quote:

On things like this is there a minimum miles that need to be done per year?

So it doesn’t take 4 decades and is outdated by the time it’s finished?


Texas will breeze through it. Louisiana will never be completed in my lifetime.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
25082 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:46 am to
So is TX going to use their share of the money to complete I-10 through Orange?

Even Louisiana would have finished that shite by now.
Posted by Pauldingtiger
Alabama
Member since Jan 2019
848 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:46 am to
Neither for or against this but you do understand this interstate is mainly connecting areas with little to no East and West interstate access. It’s main purpose is to get East and West access closer to possibly 10 military bases. Those of you complaining about areas not being serviced by this already have East to West interstate access.
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
11327 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:47 am to
For anyone that wishes OP included a map of the new Interstate.

Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44041 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:48 am to
OP did.

Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:49 am to
quote:

You ever travel US 80? It's sparsely traveled. I'm not saying zero people or industry uses it.


Yea I do - not as frequently as 10 years ago but still some (Demopolis). It's definitely not bumper to bumper or anything, but there is at least some civilian purpose to it. The area of the state south of 20/59 and northwest of 65 has very limited rapid road transportation options, and there is quite a bit of large industry there between timber, agriculture, paper, etc.

But in the end the main thing is connecting the large military bases so that they can more rapidly move equipment and troops (Gordon/Robins/Benning/Maxwell). There aren't really many good options for them that don't involve (a) going through Atlanta and/or (b) going well out of the way.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 7:51 am
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
11327 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:49 am to
An image didn't load for me. My apologies if it in there EKG.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44041 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:50 am to
NP, Murph.
That’s weird.

Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:53 am to
The Georgia portion of this alone has probably been pushed by the military for a while.

A trip from Gordon to Benning currently means going 20 to Atlanta, dealing with Atlanta, then going down 85 and 185 to Columbus. Out of the way and filled with traffic.

A Robins to Benning trip is either driving on literally 2 lane roads (which I imagine is not allowed) or driving due north on 75 to Atlanta then back down 85.
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46596 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:57 am to
quote:

The Georgia portion of this alone has probably been pushed by the military for a while.

A trip from Gordon to Benning currently means going 20 to Atlanta, dealing with Atlanta, then going down 85 and 185 to Columbus. Out of the way and filled with traffic.

A Robins to Benning trip is either driving on literally 2 lane roads (which I imagine is not allowed) or driving due north on 75 to Atlanta then back down 85.

This. Should create some economic benefit for middle Georgia, too. and hopefully bypass some traffic out of ATL (even if it means ramping up the traffic in Macon)
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 7:58 am
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:59 am to
quote:

This. Should create some economic benefit for middle Georgia, too. and hopefully bypass some traffic out of ATL (even if it means ramping up the traffic in Macon)



Yep - and even more and better access out of the Port of Savannah to West Georgia and Alabama. I'm not a Warnock guy but this is good, solid legislative work by him and Cruz.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 8:01 am
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
43018 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:59 am to
Getting traffic off I-10 through LA would be a blessing
I guess it wouldn't need a new bridge over Miss River, that would be the major cost.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
25082 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Getting traffic off I-10 through LA would be a blessing
I guess it wouldn't need a new bridge over Miss River, that would be the major cost.


BR still needs another bridge or a loop or other major and critical interstate infrastructure work. I-14 will ease I-10 a bit, but not enough to make any significant impact in BR.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:02 am to
Connecting military bases throughout the Deep South via one brand new interstate. It's almost like they're prepping for something.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:04 am to
quote:

It's almost like they're prepping for something.



Upgrading and supplementing a fighting force that is efficient, sleek and well oiled enough for the Chinese, hopefully.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44041 posts
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:07 am to
quote:

It's almost like they're prepping for something.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter