
Started By
Message
re: Has UGA officially passed Tennessee as the #2 SEC program all-time?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:38 pm to tissle
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:38 pm to tissle
your all-time SEC football standings at the end of the 2025 season -
474-171-21 .727% Alabama - 92 seasons
391-219-14 .638% Georgia - 93
368-239-19 .603% Tennessee - 92
362-242-22 .588% Louisiana St - 93
348-254-15 .576% Florida - 92
338-288-19 .539% Auburn - 92
those are the 6 with 300+ wins and a .500+ win% all-time -
295-310-15 .488% Ole Miss - 92
218-400-13 .356% Mississippi St - 92
193-420-12 .318% Kentucky - 92
149-464-18 .250% Vanderbilt - 91 seasons
1992 expansion - 34 seasons
115-158-1 .420% South Carolina
104-168-2 .368% Arkansas
2012 expansion - 14 seasons
64-49 .566% Texas A&M
56-58 .491% Missouri
2024 B12 Refugees - 2 seasons
13-3 Texas
8-8 Oklahoma
https://storage.googleapis.com/secsports-prod/upload/2026/08/03/c2d041fa-0d4f-467c-a738-60b375d677ef.pdf
474-171-21 .727% Alabama - 92 seasons
391-219-14 .638% Georgia - 93
368-239-19 .603% Tennessee - 92
362-242-22 .588% Louisiana St - 93
348-254-15 .576% Florida - 92
338-288-19 .539% Auburn - 92
those are the 6 with 300+ wins and a .500+ win% all-time -
295-310-15 .488% Ole Miss - 92
218-400-13 .356% Mississippi St - 92
193-420-12 .318% Kentucky - 92
149-464-18 .250% Vanderbilt - 91 seasons
1992 expansion - 34 seasons
115-158-1 .420% South Carolina
104-168-2 .368% Arkansas
2012 expansion - 14 seasons
64-49 .566% Texas A&M
56-58 .491% Missouri
2024 B12 Refugees - 2 seasons
13-3 Texas
8-8 Oklahoma
https://storage.googleapis.com/secsports-prod/upload/2026/08/03/c2d041fa-0d4f-467c-a738-60b375d677ef.pdf
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:40 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
LSU is a much more accomplished program compared to Tennessee.
That's not true. They are very neck and neck. There is an argument for both.
Unanimous Natties: Advantage LSU
SEC Titles: Advantage Tennessee
Wins All Time: Advantage Tennessee
Winning Percentage: Advantage Tennessee
Bowl Games: Tie
Playoff Appearances: Tie
Head-to-Head: Advantage Tennessee
If unanimous natties are all you are counting, then sure, put LSU ahead. But then I guess that means Minnesota is better than both
Either way, LSU and Tennessee are light years ahead of Auburn lol
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:43 pm to tissle
quote:
I checked Winsipedia to see how the numbers actually look side-by-side now: LINK
Interesting, but that link says it's updated up to the 2012 season. Totally missing the UGA heyday.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:48 pm to Rex Feral
quote:
It wasn't that long ago UT had more wins
From the day Doug Dickey retired as AD in 2002 until the day Danny White became AD in 2021, UT’s football program was ran by a revolving door of idiots, boobs, and meddling boosters.
First they let Fulmer and his good buddies put it on cruise control because he thought he had a job for life, his last contract had built in extensions and raises for 8 win seasons.
Then came the Kiffin debacle, then they went a complete 180 from Kiffin and hired Doofey Dooley, then Lyle Jones, then that inbred goof Pruitt. After that string of shite, Heupel looks like the second coming of Bob Neyland in comparison.
Nearly 20 years wandering the college football desert would have killed a lesser program and it will damn sure get you passed by rivals. It never should have happened to a program with the resources and support available in Knoxville
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:50 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:
It took Vince Young carrying the 2005 team on his fricking back for Texas to accomplish anything in my lifetime. Auburn has accomplished as much as tu in the modern era, with much less resources.
Pretty sure Auburn won in 2010 solely on the back of Cam.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:51 pm to Smoky Mountain Reign
quote:
First they let Fulmer and his good buddies put it on cruise control because he thought he had a job for life, his last contract had built in extensions and raises for 8 win seasons.
Then came the Kiffin debacle, then they went a complete 180 from Kiffin and hired Doofey Dooley, then Lyle Jones, then that inbred goof Pruitt. After that string of shite, Heupel looks like the second coming of Bob Neyland in comparison.
In other words, the Haslams began intervening.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:54 pm to tissle
Surprisingly good thread. Generally a lot less trolling than expected.
Don’t think it will go more than 3-4 pages, but the replies have been substantial & interesting to read.
Have an upvote.
Don’t think it will go more than 3-4 pages, but the replies have been substantial & interesting to read.
Have an upvote.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 1:59 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
quote:
Dooley
That dude just couldn’t get it done, but I recall him getting some pretty awful breaks on more than one occasion.
Possible his tenure & the general perception of him as an HC plays out very differently in an alternate dimension where a few calls or bounces go the other way.
This was an era where recruiting wasn’t just how big your budget was. As a LSU fan, I can relate to the butterfly effect.
Anyway he inherited a dumpster fire & I recall his teams always played hard. Unfortunate.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:15 pm to tissle
Well yeah, Tennessee has yet to seriously compete in the 21st century.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:19 pm to VFL67
quote:
Unanimous Natties: Advantage LSU
This is a pretty big deal. LSU has four National Titles to Tennessee's two. If you're going to claim Tennessee is a better all time program, they better be way out front in the other categories. LSU having double the number of National Titles is tough to overcome.
quote:
SEC Titles: Advantage Tennessee
Yawn. Half of Tennessee's SEC titles were before integration. 11 of 13 were before the SEC Championship Game era. Four of the 13 were shared titles... two shared by three teams. Is a 3-way tie for an SEC title in a 10-team SEC as impressive as winning an SEC title game when the SEC had 14 teams? The answer is no.
quote:
Wins All Time: Advantage Tennessee
Are all wins equal? No. LSU has 104 wins all-time against Final AP ranked opponents... Tennessee has 100. Close, but LSU has more quality wins all-time... Tennessee certainly not making up the gap of having half the number of national titles.
quote:
Winning Percentage: Advantage Tennessee
Redundant
quote:
Playoff Appearances: Tie
LOL. James Madison also is tied with you here. Putting a category for something that's barely been a thing in the sport is silly.... and when you look at Tennessee's resume that year on the whole, it becomes even more of a joke. Also, wouldn't a 2-team or 4-team playoff appearance be way more impressive than a 12-team playoff appearance?
quote:
Head-to-Head: Advantage Tennessee
Only 34 meetings ever.
LSU has double the number of national titles, and the majority of their natties and SEC titles were won during eras in which obtaining them was far more impressive/difficult. LSU has more weeks ranked in the AP Poll.... more wins over Final ranked opponents, etc.
As someone said earlier... the gap between Alabama and everyone else is massive. Georgia too is beginning to separate themselves from the pack a bit. LSU, Tennessee, Auburn, and Florida are relatively close however it's pretty obvious that LSU should be at the front of that pack.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:38 pm to DeathByTossDive226
quote:
Possible his tenure & the general perception of him as an HC plays out very differently in an alternate dimension where a few calls or bounces go the other way.
Nah. Dude couldn't recruit. Butch had to bring in walk-on's to field a full O-line.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:45 pm to n64ra
quote:
Texas - four national titles
UGA - three national titles as #2 AP finish in 1942 is BS
You do understand that Texas only has 3 AP titles, too, right? Your 1970 title is crap since you lost the Cotton Bowl and finished #3 in the AP, so if our 1942 title is bogus because we were #2 in AP what does that say about your 1970 title in which you finished #3?
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:52 pm to halfadolla50
quote:This is crazy being the one to inform an Ohio State fan about this - because I assume you're from Ohio - but the franchise Paul Brown had his most success with (4x AAFL championships, 2x pre-Super Bowl NFL championships) is now in Baltimore. They've been pretty successful there.
And Paul Brown is considered the "father of modern professional football" but everyone knows the Browns are the laughing stock of the NFL.
The school Neyland was famous for coaching is still in Knoxville, Tennessee. So pick a better analogy.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:53 pm to AUTiger789
Lol melt. Tbh i dont care about this talk in season so rank it however you like. Auburn season is over already
No LSU and Tennessee are way in front of Auburn. Everyone knows this
quote:
LSU, Tennessee, Auburn
No LSU and Tennessee are way in front of Auburn. Everyone knows this
Posted on 10/15/26 at 2:55 pm to VFL67
quote:
Realistically the tiers are
Tier 1: Bama
Tier 2: UGA, Tenn, LSU
Tier 3: Auburn and Florida
This looks right tier wise.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:13 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:
This is crazy being the one to inform an Ohio State fan about this - because I assume you're from Ohio - but the franchise Paul Brown had his most success with (4x AAFL championships, 2x pre-Super Bowl NFL championships) is now in Baltimore. They've been pretty successful there.
I can't tell if you're trolling or retarded.
If its the latter I'll explain it to you.
The Cleveland Browns fired Paul Brown long long long before that team moved to Baltimore
Paul Brown then formed the Bengals.
All the championships he won in Cleveland are still part of Cleveland's history not Baltimore's.
This post was edited on 10/15/26 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:17 pm to halfadolla50
quote:That franchise moved to Baltimore, where they've won more championships.
All the championships he won in Cleveland are still part of Cleveland's history not Baltimore's.
Today's Cleveland Browns are slightly older than the Texans.
None of this can be argued.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:22 pm to Rrrrroger
quote:
Well yeah, Tennessee has yet to seriously compete in the 21st century.
This is the crux of it all. And while most people focus on Tennessee being bad since about 2005, the program was already "down" since about 1973... ie integration with the exception of the pinnacle of the Fulmer years.
Since 1973:
National Titles:
10- Alabama
4- Oklahoma
3- Georgia
3- LSU
3- Florida
1- Auburn
1- Texas
1- Tennessee
SEC Standings:
.751- Alabama (303-100-2)
.696- Georgia (283-123-3)
.652- Florida (267-142-1)
.572- LSU (216-161-5)
.555- Tennessee (215-172-5)
.555- Auburn (221-177-5)
SEC Titles
19- Alabama
10- Georgia
8- Florida
7- Auburn
7- LSU
5- Tennessee
Weeks in AP Poll:
698- Alabama
698- Oklahoma
600- Georgia
574- Florida
554- Texas
526- LSU
468- Auburn
440- Texas A&M
437- Tennessee
Wins over Final AP Ranked Teams:
123- Alabama
101- Oklahoma
95- Florida
89- Georgia
78- Texas
74- LSU
73- Auburn
64- Tennessee
47- Texas A&M
45- Arkansas
39- Ole Miss
AP Top 25 Finishes
38- Alabama
37- Oklahoma
34- Georgia
30- Texas
27- LSU
27- Florida
26- Auburn
23- Tennessee
21- Texas A&M
We're going on well over 5 decades now in which Tennessee is easily just the 6th best program in the SEC with two new programs coming into the league that are leaps and bounds ahead. During the past 50+ years there are easily 8 current SEC programs that have been more successful than Tennessee.
It's hard to claim second best program when you're not even Top 8 of current SEC schools over a 50+ year period.
That math just doesn't work.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:23 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:
That franchise moved to Baltimore, where they've won more championships.
That franchise moved to Baltimore 33 years after Paul Brown was fired.
I honestly have no idea what point you are even trying to make.
Posted on 10/15/26 at 3:33 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
We're going on well over 5 decades now in which Tennessee is easily just the 6th best program in the SEC with two new programs coming into the league that are leaps and bounds ahead. During the past 50+ years there are easily 8 current SEC programs that have been more successful than Tennessee.
It's hard to claim second best program when you're not even Top 8 of current SEC schools over a 50+ year period.
That math just doesn't work.
Nailed it

Popular
Back to top



1








