Started By
Message
re: Going from 7 perm to 3 is a horrible idea…
Posted on 9/23/25 at 5:54 am to The Vin Man
Posted on 9/23/25 at 5:54 am to The Vin Man
quote:
You do realize you have 3 more SEC home games every year, right?
And?
You do realize that if we added Kansas, Okst, ksu and Texas tech could have 5 more sec games each year.
How would that be? Horrible.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 5:58 am
0
Posted on 9/23/25 at 6:11 am to dstone12
You are wrong
But I don’t get why people bitch when it’s completed anyway. Such a waste of time.
But I don’t get why people bitch when it’s completed anyway. Such a waste of time.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 6:13 am to dstone12
Oh no
You replace playing Bama with Georgia. And Florida with Tennessee or Texas or OU.
Oh the horror! Recruits are going to hate those games.
LSU fans bitch more than anyone on this site.
Maybe you should move to the Big 10 where they actually have a ton of craptastic games. Then you could bitch all you want.
You replace playing Bama with Georgia. And Florida with Tennessee or Texas or OU.
Oh the horror! Recruits are going to hate those games.
LSU fans bitch more than anyone on this site.
Maybe you should move to the Big 10 where they actually have a ton of craptastic games. Then you could bitch all you want.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 6:16 am
Posted on 9/23/25 at 6:52 am to dstone12
quote:
For all 16 teams.
Circling the 6 in your div and the cross div opponent was part of sec football.
Reducing your annual games will make every team have to wait every other year to play those other four will hurt the conference.
I disagree.
I'm perfectly happy giving up yearly games against Missouri, Vandy, Kentucky and Tennessee while keeping Florida, Auburn and South Carolina in order to play every team in the conference twice in every 4 year stretch.
That includes playing interesting opponents twice in a 4 year window like Alabama, LSU, Texas and Oklahoma. That goes along with playing those old division opponents twice every 4 years.
I see it as a huge win for UGA.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:27 am to DawginSC
And you will FINALLY go to A&M.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:27 am to DawginSC
quote:
I'm perfectly happy giving up yearly games against Missouri, Vandy, Kentucky
This is exactly what I’m talking about.
You get to keep Florida and Auburn and also get a good rivalry with SC.
We lost Auburn, Florida and Alabama and didn’t even get to have someone like Oklahoma.
Not one of our permanents even won the sec ONE TIME since the sec champ game. Two of them have never even been to Atlanta.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:00 am to Scoob
quote:This. It's amazing how some people focus on the negatives, and not the positives, of the new scheduling setup.
As a long time LSU fan, I'm good with the new setup. We're going to see every conference team in a short timeframe.
For those who say "it was better before"... let me point this out. LSU never played:
Hershel Walker
Bo Jackson
Peyton Manning
That's 3 of the greatest players in the history of the game, SEC players. Not 1-and-done guys.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:17 am to truth22
quote:
Having Bama Auburn LSU Ole Miss and A&M in one division, while the East had Georgia and NO ONE that could seriously challenge them.
Sit down and STFU, you know-notrhing idiot.
Tennessee, Florida, and even South Carolina were always serious challenges.
quote:
Bama Auburn LSU Ole Miss and A&M in one division,
You were NEVER a serious challenge to anything. aTm is NOT AND NEVER HAS BEEN a powerhouse that challenged in the SEC.
Ole Miss is one of three original schools that never went to Atlanta. UK and VU being the other two.
aTm never even challenged for Atlanta.
Including the Jimbo Sumlins as a powerhouse....What a joke. You are closer to the UK and VU level than you are to the top tier.
aTm a powerhouse.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:34 am to Scoob
quote:
As a long time LSU fan, I'm good with the new setup. We're going to see every conference team in a short timeframe.
For those who say "it was better before"... let me point this out. LSU never played:
Hershel Walker
Bo Jackson
Peyton Manning
That's 3 of the greatest players in the history of the game, SEC players. Not 1-and-done guys.
Great point...as a Vol fan, I would point out that I didn't get to see my team face Joe Burrow...or I could point out the fact that Tennessee only faced Bert Jones because they played LSU in a Bowl Game in 1972.
I only got to see my team face Cam Newton when he was on the bench at Florida, because we didn't play against Auburn when he was there.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:41 am to dstone12
We went 9 years without playing South Carolina before last year. New schedule is a huge improvement
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:58 am to twk
This. It's amazing how some people focus on the negatives, and not the positives, of the new scheduling setup.
You say this as a team that gets to face LSU and Texas.
That’s one big6 school along with a blueblood. You should be good with that.
With Alabama Auburn and Florida , we had more of a chance for night games.
You got your rivals and favorite games. We ended up with three teams that haven’t won the sec cg.
You say this as a team that gets to face LSU and Texas.
That’s one big6 school along with a blueblood. You should be good with that.
With Alabama Auburn and Florida , we had more of a chance for night games.
You got your rivals and favorite games. We ended up with three teams that haven’t won the sec cg.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:17 am to dstone12
quote:
Reducing your annual games will make every team have to wait every other year to play those other four will hurt the conference.
And this is worse than the 8 or so years we were having to wait to travel to other campuses under previous models?
This new model will be so much better. The main traditional rivalries are maintained and every school should hit every other campus in a 4 year span so that a 4 year player will have been in every SEC stadium at least once.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:18 am to LSUTigresFan
quote:
the conference will be fine.
Said Texas in the SWC.
Said Texas in the Big 12.
Says Texas in the SEC.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:22 am to clamdip
youre the furtherst west "original SEC member". Math checks out
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:25 am to Murph4HOF
quote:
Give Beth Mowins my best regards
brutal
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:31 am to dstone12
I see the idea to shorten the time between rematches (but NOT the push for a full H/A cycle in 4 years).
But divisions instantly told you about the CG race.
But divisions instantly told you about the CG race.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 9:32 am
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:36 am to John Casey
quote:
The main traditional rivalries are maintained
For Alabama, Tennessee and Georgia? Yes.
LSU stuck with two previously shoe-horned rivalries from the SWC and Ole Miss.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:38 am to dstone12
The SEC exists in name only. It isn't really the SEC any longer.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:40 am to dstone12
quote:
LSU stuck with two previously shoe-horned rivalries from the SWC and Ole Miss.
LSU doesn't have a true rivalry.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:43 am to John Casey
quote:
LSU doesn't have a true rivalry.
I beleive I agreed with you by saying shoe-horned.
They were forced.
Alabama, Auburn and Florida were natural.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News