Started By
Message

Didn’t Bama play an NBA player for 5 games earlier this year?

Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:25 pm
Posted by LSUTIGAHS123
Member since Oct 2017
455 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:25 pm
Chirp….chirp…chirp


Posted by LSUTIGAHS123
Member since Oct 2017
455 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:28 pm to
Signed with the Spurs.
Posted by LSUTIGAHS123
Member since Oct 2017
455 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:28 pm to
Paid by the nba.
Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
32899 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:03 am to
Rules for thee and not for me.
Posted by white beans
Member since Sep 2009
7012 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:05 am to
Selective Enforcement Conference
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
50601 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:08 am to
100% and then they had players involved in a gang style shoot out where a girl was murdered
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15387 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:10 am to
Sure did..then he went back to the NBA once the TRO was overturned...a contract in hand former ACTUAL NBA player...

What is actual frick do you do with that kind of uneven handedness by the SEC and SANKEY? So corrupt.
Posted by Bodie
Member since Aug 2022
2659 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:10 am to
A player who left Alabama with remaining elgibility

Came back, and not even just rostered. Played in 5 games



And the cucked pussies of the SECrant on are their knees begging and praying to kick LSU out over some bums not even on the roster
Posted by hoojy
In the fridge with my hot sauce.
Member since Nov 2013
11944 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:13 am to
This is most of my beef with this shite. The NCAA fricked these kids over. How in frick's name are you gonna leave out a single class with this shite, and think shite will be hunky dory. If you included the 2022 class in this? There really shouldn't be any issues. They fricking did this shite on purpose.

Then you have that chuckle head who left early and gets eligible. Even if for only 5 games.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 12:15 am
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
42633 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:15 am to
The two cases are entirely different.
Posted by Bodie
Member since Aug 2022
2659 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 1:07 am to
quote:

The two cases are entirely different.


Yeah one with pro with eligibility remaining in college, then came back, got rostered and played for multiple game

The others were forced to go pro assuming they were out of eligibility, came back, never rostered, never played

And your vagina is bleeding from the latter. Makes sense.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
21723 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:23 am to
quote:

Selective Enforcement Conference


^this has always been true.
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
14268 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:37 am to
quote:

The two cases are entirely #JustDifferent


FIFO
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
10499 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:32 am to
No they are not. Explain differences.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127892 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:36 am to
quote:

Explain differences.
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
24868 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:39 am to
... but BAMA.
Posted by rlebl39
League City, TX
Member since Jun 2011
4814 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:41 am to
quote:

The two cases are entirely different.


I know right!. Bediako left with remaining eligibility, played 2 pro seasons, was recruited back to Bama after signing a pro contract, and actually played 5 games. That’s way worse.
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10990 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:44 am to
My understanding is that during the Bediako situation, the SEC itself had no rule against playing former pros. They had never needed one as they had always piggybacked off the NCAA's rule. That's why Bediako's challenge was made against the NCAA and the SEC was included only as an interested party. So in that case Alabama, although perhaps acting against the SEC's wishes, did not break any actual conference rules. Leading into football season the SEC decided to institute their own rule against playing former pros, which now means that if LSU (or any other school) decides to play such players they will be breaking conference rules. That's the difference.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
54262 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:49 am to
First off,

Fans from Kentucky, Auburn, Florida and others jumped Bama's case about that. Stop clutching your pearls.

Secondly, once the case died, Bama left it alone. They didnt thumb their nose up at the commisioner or tell any jokes about the matter. If LSU would have left it alone after the school presidents voted to uphold Sankey's rule then LSU would have been okay.

But just like Al Davis said, Kiffin is a con man. What he says he will do is different than what he was doing.

Lastly, regardless of whatever dumb advantage you think LSU will have with Dxavion Harris, 99% of America wants pros out of college. Stop being an a-hole
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
54262 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Rules for thee and not for me.

Clutch those pearls harder princess.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter