Started By
Message
re: Defending National Champions' 2026 schedule
Posted on 7/21/26 at 4:49 pm to Buckeye06
Posted on 7/21/26 at 4:49 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
All have played in far bigger games than UF
Michigan was cheating, the other two have never won an actual big game in my lifetime. They’ve been in some and been miserable.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 4:51 pm to Landmass
That Rutgers game looks tough
Posted on 7/21/26 at 6:08 pm to Landmass
Cignetti will do good regardless of what the schedule is
He’ll just continue to stockpile 7th year senior transfers from mid-major teams at every position.
I can’t stand him but they’ll definitely have just as good of a shot this year like they did last year
He’ll just continue to stockpile 7th year senior transfers from mid-major teams at every position.
I can’t stand him but they’ll definitely have just as good of a shot this year like they did last year
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 7/22/26 at 8:45 am to semjase
This was a completely one off situation, I highly doubt Indiana ever sniffs this level ever again.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 11:00 am to GatorBait24
Injury report for Indiana was longer than Bama for Rose Bowl. In fact, the official injury report states “Alabama comes into the game healthier than they’ve been since September”
Just stop with this stuff. The game was 38-3. There was no version of either of those teams that wasn’t ending with Bama taking a beating.
Just stop with this stuff. The game was 38-3. There was no version of either of those teams that wasn’t ending with Bama taking a beating.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 11:06 am to JasonDBlaha
They are considerably younger this year. Difference now is most the transfers are from P4 schools.
I’m curious; when Saban was triple stacking blue chip players in every position, it was considered a competitive advantage right?
But now Cignetti is figured out production over potential is a true advantage, he’s in the wrong? Cignetti has one job-to win the whole damn thing. There is no trophy for: toughest SOS, made up recruiting rankings, for how your or old your roster is. His job is to win-I’d say he’s pretty damn good at it.
I’m curious; when Saban was triple stacking blue chip players in every position, it was considered a competitive advantage right?
But now Cignetti is figured out production over potential is a true advantage, he’s in the wrong? Cignetti has one job-to win the whole damn thing. There is no trophy for: toughest SOS, made up recruiting rankings, for how your or old your roster is. His job is to win-I’d say he’s pretty damn good at it.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 11:11 am to CJ786
One off? Dude he’s lost 2 games in 2 years. And those were in the road to the 2 teams that played in the natty. No clue if they’ll repeat this year or not but do you guys actually believe this? Dude has never lost more than a couple games tops anywhere he’s coached.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 11:12 am to WAC13
Was the schedule not tough when Bama and UGA were winning all the championships?
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:39 pm to bdough6767
You sound like a butt hurt Indiana fan, good luck- it's never happening again.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:45 pm to Buckeye06
Because lsu next 4 toughest opponents are light years ahead of Ohio state or Indianas 5-8
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:58 pm to The Blue Stuff
quote:Penn State will go 10-2 with that schedule and go to the CFP, and with those two losses not have a win against a top 15 team.
It's a joke. Check out Penn st. It's even worse
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:01 pm to bdough6767
He definitely lost more than 2 games before.. Even at JMU. The guys entire strategy at Indiana was recruit his old players that are familiar with his system and experienced. The average starter on that roster was 23 years old. 17/22 starters were AT LEAST in their fourth year of college, quite a few of them were sixth-year seniors. He just got a bunch of old guys with a lot of experience and ran with it. It wasn't exactly coaching genius, it was just a roster with size and experience.
That is not going to happen again, especially since the majority of those guys are no longer eligible. I truly believe Mendoza is going to fail in the NFL as well, he is not gonna have the advantage that he did at Indiana.
That is not going to happen again, especially since the majority of those guys are no longer eligible. I truly believe Mendoza is going to fail in the NFL as well, he is not gonna have the advantage that he did at Indiana.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 2:31 pm to Landmass
SEC fans whining about SOS of other teams, yet can't beat these teams in the playoff
Posted on 7/23/26 at 3:08 pm to Landmass
They don’t have any scheduled non-con P4 opponents til 2030 and that’s Notre Dame
Posted on 7/23/26 at 3:11 pm to Landmass
Actually it’s pretty clever cause it puts pressure on the B1G to add that non conP4 requirement cause it’s not a good look on their behalf if they don’t add it
Posted on 7/23/26 at 3:19 pm to Landmass
Comparing road games really brings it home:
IU
@ Rutgers
@ Nebraska
@ Michigan
@ Washington
A&M
@ LSU
@ Mizzou
@ Bama
@ USCe
@ OU
A&M has a middle of the pack SOS in the SEC
IU
@ Rutgers
@ Nebraska
@ Michigan
@ Washington
A&M
@ LSU
@ Mizzou
@ Bama
@ USCe
@ OU
A&M has a middle of the pack SOS in the SEC
Posted on 7/23/26 at 3:30 pm to Landmass
unpopular opinion but the last 8-9 games are just as tough as most SEC schedules
some of you will soon realize the SEC is kinda skating by on reputation
Posted on 7/23/26 at 3:42 pm to auburnnyc94
The difficulty in road environment is not equal, though.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:30 pm to Landmass
quote:
I wouldn't crown Michigan as a good team yet. They've been amazingly dysfunctional lately.
Underwood is trash, maybe the new coach can hide his deficiencies but LSU dodged a major bullet with him.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:46 pm to Landmass
It's crazy teams playing schedules like that are dominating the SEC the past 3 seasons. Heck our own Champion hasn't been able to figure out how to win a playoff game the past 3 seasons.
Popular
Back to top


0





