Started By
Message
re: Coaches are taking pay cuts and calling it donations to NIL
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:48 am to KingOfTheWorld
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:48 am to KingOfTheWorld
quote:
When Hugh Freeze is making $6.7 million a year and a $20m buyout to have losing seasons something is fricked up.
I agree. If it's player pay that will make boosters stop throwing so much money behind bad in the form of exorbitant coach salaries and buyouts so be it.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:49 am to NWLA_Bama
quote:
The exchange of wealth will look like the NFL by the time it is said and done. You'll have most of your starters making more money than their head coach. Try telling a 17-22 year old what to do when his paycheck is bigger than yours. Good luck with that college coaches...
This is the dynamic in all sports that I can think of and players are still taking orders and instruction from coaches. I don't know what you're looking at.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:51 am to CBandits82
quote:
I don't think anyone is fooled.
not a one

Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:53 am to Shaft Williams
That has yet to exist on the college level. Grown men are mature enough to make more than their coach and allow them to coach them hard. Try doing that to a kid. You're naive if you don't think there will be issues that root from this dynamic.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:56 am to NWLA_Bama
They aren't kids. They are young adults who are treated as adults in every facet of society. Also, they are pro athletes.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 12:58 pm to Shaft Williams
You obviously haven't coached athletes in this age range in the past 20 years. You sound clueless...
Posted on 12/16/24 at 1:03 pm to NWLA_Bama
quote:
The exchange of wealth will look like the NFL by the time it is said and done. You'll have most of your starters making more money than their head coach. Try telling a 17-22 year old what to do when his paycheck is bigger than yours. Good luck with that college coaches...
Especially if they don't have contracts and can just transfer whenever they want
Posted on 12/16/24 at 1:17 pm to Shaft Williams
I think it's silly that coaches are paying for these things.
But if players don't care about being developed and just want to go to the highest bidder, then the value of coaches who develop talent and do more than play call etc will certainly diminish.
People talk about the high cost of coaches,and that's because of what they provided. Which was a benefit to the players even though some ignorant people pretend otherwise. That was $10 million coach who was teaching those 85-125 kids the game, life and so on in addition to managing all the rest.
Now you spend 2 years developing a kid and suddenly he transfers to the highest bidder once he's developed some skills. All the money spent to do so ends up wasted.
And many of the better players don't really want to be developed at all, or don't want to put in the work. And that's the difference between being a talented player and being an elite player.
It doesn't seem sustainable long term.
But if players don't care about being developed and just want to go to the highest bidder, then the value of coaches who develop talent and do more than play call etc will certainly diminish.
People talk about the high cost of coaches,and that's because of what they provided. Which was a benefit to the players even though some ignorant people pretend otherwise. That was $10 million coach who was teaching those 85-125 kids the game, life and so on in addition to managing all the rest.
Now you spend 2 years developing a kid and suddenly he transfers to the highest bidder once he's developed some skills. All the money spent to do so ends up wasted.
And many of the better players don't really want to be developed at all, or don't want to put in the work. And that's the difference between being a talented player and being an elite player.
It doesn't seem sustainable long term.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 1:47 pm to 3down10
This just sounds like boomer nonsense to me
The vast majority of coaches have been obscenely overpaid. The players were being taken advantage of financially, to the benefit of coaches salaries and sports that lose money for the athletic department
The vast majority of coaches have been obscenely overpaid. The players were being taken advantage of financially, to the benefit of coaches salaries and sports that lose money for the athletic department
Posted on 12/16/24 at 1:55 pm to Vol92
quote:
This just sounds like boomer nonsense to me
The vast majority of coaches have been obscenely overpaid. The players were being taken advantage of financially, to the benefit of coaches salaries and sports that lose money for the athletic department
Because you are stupid and have likely never had a job with high levels of responsibilities including having your entire life and everything you say and do be in the public eye.
You probably think every job is like working at McDonalds and thus you ignorantly equate that level of duty and responsibility to guys making $10 million a year.
Even further, your ignorance then has you focus only on the 4 hours on Saturday in which you watch the players play with the coaches on the sideline to come this conclusion that the players are the only ones doing the work and that they are being taken advantage of - despite it being an opportunity the majority of people would love to have. We have kids going into major amounts of debts for a fraction of the benefits.
You don't see or account for all the extra hours the coaches put in. You have no idea the difficulties of managing people, and so on.
The worse part is your ignorance is widespread among many and that's why we are getting a fricked up system as a result.
In many cases, the coaches themselves are former players who had to spend decades perfecting their craft. And yet you judge them based on their performance to other coaches to say they are overpaid.
Congrats. You embody every bit of ignorance and entitlement I have come to expect from the most recent generations.
PS: I'm Gen X. You can tell because I don't give a frick about your feelings.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 1:57 pm to StansberryRules
quote:
Coaching salaries had to come back to earth
Buyouts need to come back to earth.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 1:58 pm to 3down10
Nice projection melt. 9.5/10
Posted on 12/16/24 at 1:58 pm to terriblegreen
quote:
Buyouts need to come back to earth.
People need to come back to earth.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 1:59 pm to 3down10
I learned my lesson with your first post
Not reading that nonsense. I imagine when you walk away from people, you can hear “that guy sure likes to hear himself talk” a lot
Likely not one iota of self awareness about it either
Not reading that nonsense. I imagine when you walk away from people, you can hear “that guy sure likes to hear himself talk” a lot
Likely not one iota of self awareness about it either
Posted on 12/16/24 at 2:00 pm to Shaft Williams
You don’t think coaches weren’t paying kids out of their pocket ? It’s been happening for years .
Posted on 12/16/24 at 2:26 pm to terriblegreen
quote:
Buyouts need to come back to earth.
The ones that are dumb are usually because of the buyouts.
The overall average yearly pay probably isn't all that much higher if at all if you adjusted for inflation.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 2:49 pm to KingOfTheWorld
quote:Brother Hugh gets a $275,000 retention bonus in January carrying him to $7mm/yr.
When Hugh Freeze is making $6.7 million a year and a $20m buyout to have losing seasons
quote:Indeed
something is fricked up
Posted on 12/16/24 at 2:54 pm to NWLA_Bama
quote:I believe we're already seeing what happens, there are 6,034 players in the current portal and 2,872 of them are starters.
That has yet to exist on the college level. Grown men are mature enough to make more than their coach and allow them to coach them hard. Try doing that to a kid.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 3:12 pm to Shaft Williams
quote:
Coaches are taking pay cuts and calling it donations to NIL
You got a link or just making shite up?
Posted on 12/16/24 at 3:20 pm to Shaft Williams
Are these funds that they are generously “donating” to tax deductible?
Back to top
