Started By
Message
re: Clemson to the SEC talk heating up
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:15 pm to DannyByGodFord
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:15 pm to DannyByGodFord
Adding Clemson to the SEC would be a downgrade only two schools from the ACC that are worth the SEC are North Carolina, FSU
0
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:16 pm to Jim Sweet
quote:
We got Dabo! We got Klub! We got Ship!
You have two losses too... one to Duke by 21 points.
I think Clemson fans might need to realize that the more time passes after their Deshaun Watson/Trevor Lawrence years, the less interesting they are as an addition for other conferences. Clemson is selling themselves as 2015-2019 Clemson... but I'm not sure that's how the other conferences are viewing them right now. I think right now they're seen more as 2011-2014 Clemson. That's not horrible. But it's not a gimme addition for anyone either.
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:19 pm to 1801
I think I just threw up in my mouth a bit. 
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:27 pm to armtackledawg
Writing is on the wall. I hate expansion but UNC, Clemson and FSU are SEC bound.
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:30 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
Writing is on the wall. I hate expansion but UNC, Clemson and FSU are SEC bound.
No one has been able to explain how the SEC adding any combination of teams not including Notre Dame would result in more money for each SEC school.
I'm sorry, the SEC isn't going to expand if the teams currently in the SEC make less money. The SEC isn't going to expand just because the Big 10 is doing it. It will only happen if the schools make more. If you can't actually provide some logical reasoning on how they'll make more (considering they're just breaking even for now by adding Texas and Oklahoma), I simply won't believe that the SEC will expand.
Nobody outside of ND is available that will bring in more money than Texas/OU. And Texas/OU are just break even for the moment.
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:31 pm to DawginSC
quote:
No one has been able to explain how the SEC adding any combination of teams not including Notre Dame would result in more money for each SEC school.
It’s about matchups now. Clemson vs LSU sells
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:35 pm to DannyByGodFord
We already have vandy
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:36 pm to DannyByGodFord
So…. IF this is true, it obviously has to be 4 teams to the SEC……Clemson/FSU/NorthCarolina and ???
Who would be the 4th ??? team?
Duke? NCState? Virginia? VaTech? Miami?
(Clemson/FSU/NorthCarolina seem inevitable…. But they’re not just gonna add 3)
Who would be the 4th ??? team?
Duke? NCState? Virginia? VaTech? Miami?
(Clemson/FSU/NorthCarolina seem inevitable…. But they’re not just gonna add 3)
This post was edited on 9/27/23 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:38 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Duke? NCState? Virginia? VaTech? Miami?
It’s gotta be a Virginia school. But who knows?
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:39 pm to DannyByGodFord
I thought Clemson fans were smarter than the mouth breathers that post here.
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:44 pm to DannyByGodFord
quote:
Clemson to the SEC talk heating up
Posted on 9/27/23 at 7:55 pm to DawginSC
Clemson in the SEC is top 3 or 2 on day one in prestige. I will give Bama but after that it’s us. No body else can make the argumen.
Where are the coots 14 or 15????
BOOM!!!
Where are the coots 14 or 15????
BOOM!!!
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:02 pm to Jim Sweet
The citadel beats up on directional carolina too, should they also come?
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:05 pm to Jim Sweet
2019 pretty much ended Clemson and Dabo. Nice solid program though and it was a really good run for about 5 years.
The transfer portal (and NIL) finished it off.
The transfer portal (and NIL) finished it off.
This post was edited on 9/27/23 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:08 pm to JPLSU1981
Clemson and FSU are a natural fit for the SEC.
Miami is not.
Miami is not.
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:08 pm to DannyByGodFord
Big 12 material. fsu & clem.
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:11 pm to Jim Sweet
clemson has nothing to offer now except for boring stories of glory days.
Reminds me of a song……..
Reminds me of a song……..
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:17 pm to DannyByGodFord
FFFUUUUCCCKKKK CLEMSUX! That is all!
Oh yeah, forgot.....Boom.
Oh yeah, forgot.....Boom.
This post was edited on 9/27/23 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:18 pm to Ancient Astronaut
If you break apart the ACC, the SEC can take up to 5 schools and it really doesn't cost ESPN any extra money.
The Big 10 just monetized basketball, so if the SEC included Duke and UNC in the expansion then the SEC probably could get 8 million a year for extended basketball rights.
A SEC/Big 12 basketball agreement could add more as the Big 12 will be looking for ways to add revenue. Their teams will only be getting between 30 and 40 million while the SEC and Big 10 will be 90 to 100 million.
The Big 10 just monetized basketball, so if the SEC included Duke and UNC in the expansion then the SEC probably could get 8 million a year for extended basketball rights.
A SEC/Big 12 basketball agreement could add more as the Big 12 will be looking for ways to add revenue. Their teams will only be getting between 30 and 40 million while the SEC and Big 10 will be 90 to 100 million.
Posted on 9/27/23 at 8:22 pm to bamabaseballsec
exactly Furman to!!!
Clemson and Dabo is a mega get for the SEC take them back to the top.
boot the coots to the sunbelt and they wouldny even win it!!!!!
Suck on that lil beemer
BOOM!!!!!!!
Clemson and Dabo is a mega get for the SEC take them back to the top.
boot the coots to the sunbelt and they wouldny even win it!!!!!
Suck on that lil beemer
BOOM!!!!!!!
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News