Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/27/25 at 7:39 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
I have witnessed plenty of bad interviews from the interviewee.
All BK has to do is just act naturally and no one will want to hire him. Dude's an a-hole.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 7:45 pm to aspiclark
Low didnt account for our ace in the hole, Yellow Rose of Louisiana realtor we sent to Fang Fang his arse on the morality clause as soon as he got here.
Good game leprechaun.
Good game leprechaun.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 7:48 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
A coach should think twice before signing a contract with an institution that has demonstrated a willingness to welch on their contracts.
A Texas public university has the most famous contract Welch example and the state just claimed sovereign immunity and washed their hands of it. Might be part of the reason Jimbo was guaranteed so much money and why A&M paid it because twice welching would have made shockwaves.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 7:52 pm to vidtiger23
If he violated the morals clause of his contract he certainly can be dinged.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 7:57 pm to Dallaswho
What the frick are you talking about?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 7:59 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
What the frick are you talking about?
I assumed he was talking about Texas Tech and Leach but no idea if that was it.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:03 pm to aspiclark
Nobody wants a fight over mitigation. Someone else ran the numbers and found that if Kelly was paid a present value lump sum rather than receiving monthly payments, without mitigation, that figure would be $33 million; i.e., that’s the figure that paid to Kelly now, would leave him as well off as taking payments over time.
Now, what kind of salary should Kelly be able to earn if he diligently pursued all available coaching opening? If one assumes that he could find a job paying him 1/3 of his current salary, then you should be able to reduce that lump sum payment by 1/3, to $22 million, without too much of a argument from Kelly, and more would certainly be plausible.
So, all this talk about claiming a morals clause violation to beat Kelly down to $20 million lump sum payment sounds like BS to me, as that is within the range for a negotiated lump sum payment based on Kelly’s duty to mitigate.
Now, what kind of salary should Kelly be able to earn if he diligently pursued all available coaching opening? If one assumes that he could find a job paying him 1/3 of his current salary, then you should be able to reduce that lump sum payment by 1/3, to $22 million, without too much of a argument from Kelly, and more would certainly be plausible.
So, all this talk about claiming a morals clause violation to beat Kelly down to $20 million lump sum payment sounds like BS to me, as that is within the range for a negotiated lump sum payment based on Kelly’s duty to mitigate.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:04 pm to TutHillTiger
Then you skimp 9n talent real smart cajun coonasses
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:40 pm to Jdillard343434
Tom Mars stuck it up our arse multiple times with the Houston nutt and then transfer issue under freeze so I'm not doubting what that guy says
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:43 pm to aspiclark
brian kelly's agent telling him about lsu's failed attempts to not pay him his fully guaranteed massive buyout
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:46 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
Who gives a frick, a single donor has it covered
I love our retarded LSU fans.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:01 pm to Shunface
brian kelly going out for margarita pitchers at lunch today in baton rouge knowing he's owed his fully guaranteed buyout and there's not a god damn thing those coonassess can do about it like
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:07 pm to aspiclark
Probably really comes down to what "for cause" means in his buyout clause.
If he was hired to coach players then maybe he was fired without cause. If his job is to win games/perform on key performance metrics (like winning games) he may have been fired for cause.
Truth is, most of the people talking about this are meatheads or hicks trying to determine what's going to happen based on contract law. It could easily be that LSU has a PIP system and he's been written up enough to create cause, just like any other state employee but with a higher salary and no union representation.
If he was hired to coach players then maybe he was fired without cause. If his job is to win games/perform on key performance metrics (like winning games) he may have been fired for cause.
Truth is, most of the people talking about this are meatheads or hicks trying to determine what's going to happen based on contract law. It could easily be that LSU has a PIP system and he's been written up enough to create cause, just like any other state employee but with a higher salary and no union representation.
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:08 pm to aspiclark
I told you the LSU pours have broke the bank.
Next day crying and trying to work out a deal.
Next day crying and trying to work out a deal.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:09 pm to ChetRando
i love the big brained idea that lsu pip'ed brian kelly, lol.
that is just adorable.
that is just adorable.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:10 pm to aspiclark
It's not big brained, super simple brained. It's contract law and attorneys. PIP was just an example.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:11 pm to ChetRando
quote:
Probably really comes down to what "for cause" means in his buyout clause.
If he was hired to coach players then maybe he was fired without cause. If his job is to win games/perform on key performance metrics (like winning games) he may have been fired for cause.
Truth is, most of the people talking about this are meatheads or hicks trying to determine what's going to happen based on contract law. It could easily be that LSU has a PIP system and he's been written up enough to create cause, just like any other state employee but with a higher salary and no union representation.
Funny that you talk about meatheads and hicks when your description of his contract (which is publicly available) is retarded.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:12 pm to ChetRando
a really really funny example
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:14 pm to Mo Jeaux
11. 1. e.
11. 1. q.
11. 1. q.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News