Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:3773
Registered on:7/18/2014
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Jimbo to Auburn?

Posted by aspiclark on 11/3/25 at 10:07 am to
yep, i've heard it said.
sayin was eligible to play for exactly zero games at alabama.
if an interim ad has to say it….
it’s funny bc i never said he was and know that he isn’t. (nobody has paid the buyout. lsu has no leverage to reduce it.)

you are insanely upset about a post you imagined.
careful boys we got an active cryer in progress here, he’s leaking

re: The LSU obsession

Posted by aspiclark on 10/31/25 at 4:06 pm to
somebody post the suicide hotline for this one
the kids in the children’s hospitals will be huddled around barrel fires in the back alley to keep warm in louisiana this winter.

it’s different down there. (they have less money.)
so funny to watch those poors puff out their chests about how much money the canes guy has now.

truly a special place down there in that impoverished festering swamp..
this is all specified in the contract, typically if the coach terminates the agreement he’s owed nothing.
i read your little post cleetus.
do you know how many variations of “we have to make the coaches take performance based contracts” have been posted here this week? you’re dented my man.
right, which is a completely nonsensical point of view.

i’m not salty, just commenting on the wishful thinking being expressed here. there is no crisis here except the desperate, erratic leadership at lsu.

the idea that there is some kind of market correction coming where coaches will have to take less friendly contracts as more money floods the sport is trailer park brained wishful thinking.
out of curiosity, have you experienced some kind of traumatic brain injury?
elko has a 7 million dollar base salary and 20+ million dollar buyout. he’s also going to get a massive raise this year. a&m paid up to get him from duke. genuinely laughable to claim his contract fits the non existent model op is proposing.
what incentive would any coach with options have to sign a contract structured around performance based incentives? there’s a reason contracts don’t work this way. a 12 year olds understanding of how this all works tbh.

nobody is forcing these schools to structure these contracts this way. they are welcome to hire some desperate bum instead of the cream of the crop if they can’t afford it.

but if they want an elite talent, this is the price. that’s capitalism.

albert means almost got bama the death penalty. reggie bush had to give back his heisman. etc.
i mean a bunch of teams got caught, how could you be asking this?