Started By
Message
re: Cant make this up....LSU now has to choose between Contempt vs Sankey's sanctions
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:40 am to ColoradoAg
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:40 am to ColoradoAg
quote:Texas - the Muslim capital of America. Keep Austin weird!!!
So now judges determine the roster in BR? What a worthless state
You need to get a grip. LSU is not making your life fall apart. Maybe go see a counselor?
1
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:42 am to jangalang
quote:
What a Kangaroo
Reposting for effect
That's a parody account and an AI generated image. The AI age is going to be treacherous for you Boomers.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:52 am to ColoradoAg
Yep. Raised them….all eagles and proud Aggies.
Also direct large engineering team comprised of predominantly Aggies. Very proud of them too.
I believe all of those Aggies would disagree with you
Turd
Also direct large engineering team comprised of predominantly Aggies. Very proud of them too.
I believe all of those Aggies would disagree with you
Turd
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:54 am to Go Go Gata
Don’t feel bad since it was LSU whom started all of this …. they are done .
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:56 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
But we don't have to PLAY them.
Not yet. This shite wouldn't shock me if we get to the point that we start seeing lawsuits for lack of playing time.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:57 am to Go Go Gata
quote:
Sankey's sanctions
Sankey will lose his job over this. He has shown clear bias against a member school.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:58 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
Texas - the Muslim capital of America.
You have obviously never been to Michigan or Minnesota.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:59 am to ColoradoAg
quote:Almost like how judges control Presidential policy these days. But no, CFB rosters is a way worse thing
So now judges determine the roster in BR? What a worthless state.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:59 am to Go Go Gata
this would mean any player could sue if they get cut from a program. I don't buy it. People are misunderstanding the ruling. He can sue all he wants, that doesn't force LSU to roster them. They still have control over the roster. it's an empty threat.
LSU is NOT currently under an explicit court order saying “Wright and Harris must be placed on the roster.”
What LSU is under is a broader injunction saying it cannot take action that harms the plaintiffs' ability to compete. The players’ lawyer is arguing that refusing to roster them would violate that language, and he's threatening to ask the judge to hold LSU in contempt if LSU refuses.
That would create the next legal question: Why did LSU leave them off?
If LSU said:
“We aren't rostering them because the SEC threatened us with sanctions,”
the plaintiffs would have a very strong argument that LSU is doing exactly what the injunction was designed to prevent.
But imagine Kiffin said:
“They're eligible. I simply don't think Wright is one of our best 105 football players.”
That's a much stranger proposition for a judge to call contempt, because it would effectively mean the injunction has transformed into a judicially guaranteed roster spot. Nothing I've found says the order expressly does that.
What's next? a player sues because he's not starting?
just fricking blow up college football and get it over with. This is getting ridiculous.
and people thought we were going to be the ones to blow up the conference
LSU is NOT currently under an explicit court order saying “Wright and Harris must be placed on the roster.”
What LSU is under is a broader injunction saying it cannot take action that harms the plaintiffs' ability to compete. The players’ lawyer is arguing that refusing to roster them would violate that language, and he's threatening to ask the judge to hold LSU in contempt if LSU refuses.
That would create the next legal question: Why did LSU leave them off?
If LSU said:
“We aren't rostering them because the SEC threatened us with sanctions,”
the plaintiffs would have a very strong argument that LSU is doing exactly what the injunction was designed to prevent.
But imagine Kiffin said:
“They're eligible. I simply don't think Wright is one of our best 105 football players.”
That's a much stranger proposition for a judge to call contempt, because it would effectively mean the injunction has transformed into a judicially guaranteed roster spot. Nothing I've found says the order expressly does that.
What's next? a player sues because he's not starting?
just fricking blow up college football and get it over with. This is getting ridiculous.
and people thought we were going to be the ones to blow up the conference
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:04 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:00 am to jangalang
quote:
What a Kangaroo
Reposting for effect
you reposted something fake for effect?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:26 am to Go Go Gata
Ai photoshopped .
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:32 am to ColoradoAg
quote:
So now judges determine the roster in BR? What a worthless state.
Apparently in Oxford too since that’s how Trinidad Sore Throat got his 6th year.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News