
Started By
Message
Can you guess which one of these was ruled a catch and which one was not?
Posted on 10/28/26 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 10/28/26 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 10/28/26 at 2:11 pm to finchmeister08
No offense.
It is 2026.
Screenshots are for losers when bitching about refereeing.
I wouldnt trust a screenshot ever.
It is 2026.
Screenshots are for losers when bitching about refereeing.
I wouldnt trust a screenshot ever.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 2:19 pm to meansonny
quote:
Screenshots are for losers when bitching about refereeing.
They do a pretty good job at capturing exact moments when the ball hits the ground
Your entire post reeks of bitching because you know that UGA wr did not catch the ball but you don't want to admit it.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 2:27 pm to JTM72
quote:
They do a pretty good job at capturing exact moments when the ball hits the ground
Fair enough.
But they also catch a point in time when irrelevant to the playcall.
Again.
It is 2026.
You should be able to do better than a screenshot.
And if you can't, then you are lazy and/or hiding something.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 2:34 pm to meansonny
quote:
Screenshots are for losers
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 10/28/26 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 10/28/26 at 3:05 pm to finchmeister08
Did they call the one with the Florida player a catch on the field? If they did, then without seeing any other angle, I would say that the catch should have stood. If it wasn't called a catch, I'd probably call no catch. You can kind of see the grass become disturbed when the ball makes contact indicating that it probably hit the ground.
The Georgia player obviously didn't catch that ball, no matter what was called on the field.
The Georgia player obviously didn't catch that ball, no matter what was called on the field.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 3:11 pm to Funky Tide 8
If you haven't figured it out yet, the home team generally gets the benefit of the call on the field that generally requires compelling evidence to be overturned. Generally, the visiting team gets the shaft of the call on the field that requires compelling evidence to be overturned. If that makes sense. Obviously the Georgia receiver did not catch the ball and it looks like the Florida receiver did catch the ball.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 3:14 pm to entmd2002
Well that game was at a neutral site, and it seems like you forgot what happened 3 weeks ago in Tuscaloosa.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 3:17 pm to Funky Tide 8
Florida was robbed on both plays.
Been going on for a while in that game.
Been going on for a while in that game.
This post was edited on 10/28/26 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 10/28/26 at 3:21 pm to meansonny
quote:
But they also catch a point in time when irrelevant to the playcall.
The ground can't cause a fumble, however, it can cause an incomplete pass, I'm not so sure this point in time is irrelevant to the play. To be fair, I have not seen the whole play, but unless he rolled on the ground with the ball 2-3 times after completely securing the ball, this should probably be ruled an incomplete catch.
quote:
You should be able to do better than a screenshot.
And if you can't, then you are lazy and/or hiding something.
So should refs not be able to pause a replay when review plays in the booth? A paused replay is the same as a screenshot, is it not?
Posted on 10/28/26 at 3:24 pm to JTM72
quote:
So should refs not be able to pause a replay when review plays in the booth? A paused replay is the same as a screenshot, is it not?
Not, it is not.
A paused video has context of what happened before and after. I screenshot posted on a message board thread has no visible past or future context. Pretty simple stuff.
This post was edited on 10/28/26 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 10/28/26 at 3:30 pm to Go Go Gata
quote:
Been going on for a while in that game
Not just in that game unfortunately. Florida never gets any love from officials SMH. Some interesting stats on this have been showing up this year on twitter and reddit that are eye opening.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 3:34 pm to 954gator
quote:
Not just in that game unfortunately. Florida never gets any love from officials
That's true.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 4:43 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
A paused video has context of what happened before and after. I screenshot posted on a message board thread has no visible past or future context. Pretty simple stuff.
This gif was posted in this thread by someone else. That screenshot was not at an irrelevant point during that play sequence..
Posted on 10/28/26 at 5:01 pm to finchmeister08
I would say UGA was not a catch, and Florida was probably not a catch.
The ball looks like it may have hit the ground between the Florida player's arms before he pulled them together under the ball, but I can't tell for sure. I could see it staying as called either way if there were no other angles.
The ball looks like it may have hit the ground between the Florida player's arms before he pulled them together under the ball, but I can't tell for sure. I could see it staying as called either way if there were no other angles.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 5:04 pm to finchmeister08
single frame image is an automatic downvote from me.
It's unlikely the ball on the left was complete, but it's impossible to tell with a single frame image. Maybe he caught it that way. I doubt it, but the information isn't available.
And maybe the other guy scooped it. Can't tell with a single frame image.
I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm just saying your argument is bad.
It's unlikely the ball on the left was complete, but it's impossible to tell with a single frame image. Maybe he caught it that way. I doubt it, but the information isn't available.
And maybe the other guy scooped it. Can't tell with a single frame image.
I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm just saying your argument is bad.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 5:22 pm to finchmeister08
Looks like they got the calls right 
Posted on 10/28/26 at 5:39 pm to finchmeister08
In both instances, his intent was to catch the ball, so based on a week 1 NFL ruling, both should have been completions.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 6:48 pm to finchmeister08
neither one is a catch. the ball hit the ground both times.
Posted on 10/28/26 at 9:53 pm to finchmeister08
what if someone throws a cleet, is that considered a fair pass ?

Popular
Back to top


6








