
Started By
Message

Can we stop with LSU getting kicked out of SEC threads?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:52 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:52 pm
That's retarded and never going to happen.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:55 pm to Ham Solo
They did get kicked out of their own stadium, though...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:56 pm to Hugh McElroy
Still living in the past I see
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:08 am to stopitnow1
Tell us more about that lsu team from 8 years ago.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:24 am to Ham Solo
We know. LSU and Kiffin will cave in the end.
Prez has no balls to actually vote against.
Kiffin said Monday he wasn't gonna break rules.
Prez has no balls to actually vote against.
Kiffin said Monday he wasn't gonna break rules.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:25 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:07 am to koreandawg
quote:
Kiffin said Monday he wasn't gonna break rules.
Only if the court reverses their decision he said. Otherwise, seems apparent that he plans on playing them.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:55 am to Big EZ Tiger
Interesting to see the La AG weighing in; sounds like the state is sending a message to Sankey that they have LSU's back. This isn't just a social media commentary like the Ga AG, she filed an Amicus Brief which pretty much lays out what the state might do if this escalates.
There's a lot of bluster on Sankey's part, but I really don't think the SEC wants to get into a direct conflict with the Louisiana government. That's a whole different animal than just a state judge.
I think the SEC backs down, because this can get very, very dangerous to the conference:
1) You have Texas being allowed to keep a player who attended an NFL minicamp. To attend that camp, he had to sign an NFL Rookie Participation Contract. There's a good chance that could be ruled a short-term "professional contract", under examination.
2) You have Ole Miss currently with Chambliss, who was ruled (twice) by the NCAA to be ineligible, and then which a judge issued an injunction to allow to play.
Those are 2 clear examples that the SEC has NOT threatened any punishment to the schools.
Now, you have the SEC threatening LSU, which is a state-run institution, with MASSIVE punishment if they, too, take in and allow someone to play under a court ruling. And they didn't make the rule and penalty until after the court issued that restraining order, so it can be determined to be punitive and directed at LSU specifically. LSU isn't private, so the state itself would be prompted to respond and defend it's institution.
Sankey tried to throw his weight around, but could open the SEC up to antitrust violations, bad-faith breach of contract rulings, and illegal group boycott rulings. SEC doesn't want that smoke. I think Sankey got himself fired by the members, he just doesn't know it yet.
There's a lot of bluster on Sankey's part, but I really don't think the SEC wants to get into a direct conflict with the Louisiana government. That's a whole different animal than just a state judge.
I think the SEC backs down, because this can get very, very dangerous to the conference:
1) You have Texas being allowed to keep a player who attended an NFL minicamp. To attend that camp, he had to sign an NFL Rookie Participation Contract. There's a good chance that could be ruled a short-term "professional contract", under examination.
2) You have Ole Miss currently with Chambliss, who was ruled (twice) by the NCAA to be ineligible, and then which a judge issued an injunction to allow to play.
Those are 2 clear examples that the SEC has NOT threatened any punishment to the schools.
Now, you have the SEC threatening LSU, which is a state-run institution, with MASSIVE punishment if they, too, take in and allow someone to play under a court ruling. And they didn't make the rule and penalty until after the court issued that restraining order, so it can be determined to be punitive and directed at LSU specifically. LSU isn't private, so the state itself would be prompted to respond and defend it's institution.
Sankey tried to throw his weight around, but could open the SEC up to antitrust violations, bad-faith breach of contract rulings, and illegal group boycott rulings. SEC doesn't want that smoke. I think Sankey got himself fired by the members, he just doesn't know it yet.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:24 am to Ham Solo
LSU fans have not been kicked out of any threads on here. Stop saying things that aren't true.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:26 am to Big EZ Tiger
quote:
Only if the court reverses their decision he said. Otherwise, seems apparent that he plans on playing them.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:25 am to koreandawg
quote:No, I don't think they will.
We know. LSU and Kiffin will cave in the end.
What happens if the SEC tries to follow through with the penalties? Illegal cartel action, an antitrust violation. Louisiana AG files the antitrust lawsuit and nukes the conference. That's what this is building up to, and why the AG filed an amicus brief; letting the SEC know the state's on deck.
What happens if other schools boycott LSU games? Breach of contract with the networks, which not only kills revenue flow but incurs penalties. Massive penalties. And btw also clear example of illegal cartel activity, ala antitrust lawsuit.
I think this is the endgame, to be honest. Both sides are pushing, and the result of an antitrust lawsuit would be to force the breakaway into a new model of corporate superconference, outside of NCAA control. Players become employees and you get a CBA, LSU rejoins the conference in return for accepting the settlement that would keep from bankrupting everyone, escalating NIL deals go away. New normal, with the Big 10 and SEC at a different level along with some other power schools.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:36 am to Scoob
quote:
What happens if the SEC tries to follow through with the penalties? Illegal cartel action, an antitrust violation. Louisiana AG files the antitrust lawsuit and nukes the conference.
Ok, let’s just watch LSU nuke the conference then. Be the victorious villian.
The conference already saw how the NCAA was gutted slowly over time.
So if the courts rule the SEC has no ability to make rules and enforce them, then just be done with it.
“Proving a point” that the SEC has no power would destroy the conference anyway.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:43 am to Scoob
I’ve been saying it since they went hard line and started leaking info and posturing that LSU would be “expelled” from the conference. “Sankey is going to get fired over this”. He listened to bad advice, people with hurt feelings and a vendetta, and backed the SEC into a corner. They either back down and look weak or risk getting torn apart in the courts.
The SEC really can’t do much besides open themselves up for even more dangerous lawsuits with significant punitive damages if they lose. Not to mention during discovery, all the dirty little secrets and financial details will be made public.
The SEC universities want none of that. The SEC admin and Sankey got on their high horse and were frustrated by the power they no longer have, so they tried to make a public display that they’re bigger than their governing body and would make whatever rules they want and apply them however they see fit.
Pettiti played Sankey again. He’s been making Sankey look like a clown for the better part of the last 5 years. Pettiti wasn’t dumb enough to openly insinuate they were going to defy a judges standing order.
The SEC really can’t do much besides open themselves up for even more dangerous lawsuits with significant punitive damages if they lose. Not to mention during discovery, all the dirty little secrets and financial details will be made public.
The SEC universities want none of that. The SEC admin and Sankey got on their high horse and were frustrated by the power they no longer have, so they tried to make a public display that they’re bigger than their governing body and would make whatever rules they want and apply them however they see fit.
Pettiti played Sankey again. He’s been making Sankey look like a clown for the better part of the last 5 years. Pettiti wasn’t dumb enough to openly insinuate they were going to defy a judges standing order.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:12 am to Ham Solo
Again, this is not about 2 players. This is about schools losing autonomy to choose what students they enroll. Not football players, students. Because if a judge can rule that a school has to sign a football player, that means they are also forcing the school to accept and enroll him.
These university presidents and chancellors are not up in arms over 2 football players. They are up in arms over the idea that a judge from East Baton Rouge has the power to force a university to accept a student athlete. The student part is why this is such a big deal to them.
If a player can go to court and sue to be admitted despite not meeting all SEC requirements, what is to stop a non-athlete who made a 15 on the ACT and barely graduated high school with 2.0 GPA from finding a sympathetic or corrupt judge, suing, and the judge forcing the university to accept them.
The presidents and chancellors will gladly go thermonuclear to prevent this.
These university presidents and chancellors are not up in arms over 2 football players. They are up in arms over the idea that a judge from East Baton Rouge has the power to force a university to accept a student athlete. The student part is why this is such a big deal to them.
If a player can go to court and sue to be admitted despite not meeting all SEC requirements, what is to stop a non-athlete who made a 15 on the ACT and barely graduated high school with 2.0 GPA from finding a sympathetic or corrupt judge, suing, and the judge forcing the university to accept them.
The presidents and chancellors will gladly go thermonuclear to prevent this.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:16 am to AGGIES
quote:
Ok, let’s just watch LSU nuke the conference then. Be the victorious villian.
The conference already saw how the NCAA was gutted slowly over time.
So if the courts rule the SEC has no ability to make rules and enforce them, then just be done with it.
“Proving a point” that the SEC has no power would destroy the conference anyway.
No body wants any of that. The NCAA could end this in seconds if it chose to right the wrong it solely created here. Instead, it’s choosing the path of most conflict and destruction. The irony is that by “being tough” here, the NCAA is eroding what little is left of its authority and credibility.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:26 am to Scoob
quote:
What happens if the SEC tries to follow through with the penalties? Illegal cartel action, an antitrust violation. Louisiana AG files the antitrust lawsuit and nukes the conference. That's what this is building up to, and why the AG filed an amicus brief; letting the SEC know the state's on deck.
I think you are right that LSU will play these guys. And the conference - the 15 other members - will retaliate. Very strongly. You know how they could retaliate that would be damned near impossible to fight in court?
Kick LSU out of the conference. No reason needs to be given. Membership in the SEC is voluntary. But a school can be voted out by the other members for any reason. Or no reason.
Kicking LSU out of the SEC would not prevent the players from playing college football. And that is what this is about, whether these guys are eligible to play college football. Ruling they are eligible to play college football is very different than ruling they are eligible to be a student at every school in the country. If eligible, they can play college football. Just not at a SEC school because they don’t meet the requirements.
So while I agree with the first part of your statement, the end result won’t be what you think it will be.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:32 am to ibldprplgld
The NCAA is a laughingstock. They can’t do anything. They already lose every time in court.
Thats why the Big 10 came out with rules first, and the SEC right after that. They had to.
So yeah, if the Louisiana judge ends up making the SEC into a laughingstock that can’t enforce rules or govern its own members… then it’s open season from here on out.
There's no use locking the barn door after the horse has bolted…
Thats why the Big 10 came out with rules first, and the SEC right after that. They had to.
So yeah, if the Louisiana judge ends up making the SEC into a laughingstock that can’t enforce rules or govern its own members… then it’s open season from here on out.
There's no use locking the barn door after the horse has bolted…
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:48 am to Scoob
I have been clear about what I think will and won't happen, but your post is chock full of conjecture that isn't true.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:51 am to Ham Solo
That mouth breathers on here really believe this would ever happen over this just shows how stupid the population of this board and america in general actually is. No capability of critical thinking to save their delusional lives.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:53 am to kiffinisnextsaban
That was a helluva melt earlier.

Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:57 am to kiffinisnextsaban
The games will be played. LSU will not be terminated from the conference.
Now, if Kiffin plays Wtight... I think that is a huge risk by LSU because I think the SEC will ultimately prevail in court eventually. And in that event, I believe the SEC could levy penalties under the bylaws.
Now, if Kiffin plays Wtight... I think that is a huge risk by LSU because I think the SEC will ultimately prevail in court eventually. And in that event, I believe the SEC could levy penalties under the bylaws.

Popular
Back to top

5








