Started By
Message
re: Can We Keep a Running Tally of Whose Side Everyone is On?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:05 am to Boom33
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:05 am to Boom33
quote:
If the SEC loses the federal case, it's pretty much the end of conference autonomy and the entire thing will be even worse than it is now.
Not true. That already happened years ago with the insane playing of 7th year players, etc.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:07 am to captdalton
quote:
The Allies, Team SEC
President of Tennessee and chair of the SEC Voting Committee
President of Oklahoma
President of Georgia
AG of Georgia
AG of South Carolina
Steven Pearl
G Munny
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:10 am to UpToPar
quote:
Current SEC rules require that a player be eligible under the NCAA eligibility requirements. So all of the players in the past that were ineligible under NCAA rules were also ineligible under the SEC rules. Then guess what happened? Those players got an injunction from a court declaring them eligible. Explain how that's different here.
I have multiple times.
In the other cases you mention it was a single person getting a single exception.
In the case with LSU, you launched a coordinated attack against the SEC to force the SEC to associate with players that were below the standards the SEC and it's member set.
The SEC tried to be nice about it, clarifying the rules in a 15-0 vote. LSU said - frick the SEC we will use the courts to get what we want.
And now you are being sued and will soon be out of the league. If you want to be a member of the SEC you must follow SEC rules.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:12 am to vidtiger23
quote:
Not true. That already happened years ago with the insane playing of 7th year players, etc.
Single cases of exceptions. Not forcing the conference to change its rules completely.
Or you can all believe it's just because everyone hates LSU for as long as you can.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:12 am to HogPharmer
quote:Even a conglomeration of the most advanced AI LLM’s could not achieve such a feat.
Can we keep a running tally of how many stupid threads you start everyday?
Perhaps someday when quantum computing is perfected it could be possible, but even then it’s unlikely.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:15 am to Boom33
quote:
Single cases of exceptions. Not forcing the conference to change its rules completely. Or you can all believe it's just because everyone hates LSU for as long as you can.
If you allow tons of single cases you open the door to it no longer being single cases. That argument is BS. Hell LSU is doing no different than what Bama did in basketball just last year.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:19 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:18 am to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
I’m just on the side of stopping the chaos in college sports. I don’t really care about the outcome of the LSU/SEC lawsuits. I hope this situation will spur some change to rein in the chaos, though.
Exactly how I felt about Chambliss.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:19 am to LewDawg
Hey Lew, did Murph4HOF get whacked? Haven't seen him around, he was a good egg.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:21 am to captdalton
Mississippi St. is on LSU's side, to spite Ole Miss
Everyone else is on the anti-LSU side because they want to see a contender go down
Everyone else is on the anti-LSU side because they want to see a contender go down
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:22 am to vidtiger23
quote:
Hell LSU is doing no different than what Bama did in basketball just last year.
Nope, the conference response was different though.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:22 am to TigerLunatik
I feel same way.. Was hoping that situation would make somebody make a legit law for all to follow. One university can’t play a kid and another cant when both kids involved gave TRO in hand . Just saying. They need to end this madness. When a kid can make more playing college ball then in NFL it’s time to do something
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:22 am to captdalton
Hasn't USCe already taken a kicker and CB?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:22 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Hell LSU is doing no different than what Bama did in basketball just last year.
Nope, the conference response was different though.
Just a tiny bit of difference.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:22 am to vidtiger23
quote:
If you allow tons of single cases you open the door to it no longer being single cases. That argument is BS. Hell LSU is doing no different than what Bama did in basketball just last year.
The SEC didn't allow anything; they were forced by the courts. But they were individual cases.
LSU is forcing the SEC to change its rules completely. That is why you are being sued under the 1st amendment for forced association.
It's not an eligibility case.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:28 am to Boom33
quote:
LSU is forcing the SEC to change its rules completely
No we aren’t. It’s the same thing lol. What?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:30 am to captdalton
quote:
Add any I missed please.
Nate Oats in support of axis
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:35 am to Tiger Prawn
quote:
But I think the NCAA wants all this chaos because it helps their case to pass the Protect College Sports Act
This is what a lot of people don’t get. I think they almost welcome it at this point and may make it as loud as possible even if they end up just letting the injunctions go.
Back to top


1







