Started By
Message
re: Buying or Selling: LSU 8-0 Headed into November
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:23 am to DhanTigers212
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:23 am to DhanTigers212
quote:happens all the time
LSU doesnt choke agaisnt bama
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:23 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Oh thats right you are an LSU fan and you think Kevin Steele actually coaches football
I forgot that LSU just started having a good defense in 2009. Thanks for that reminder.
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:25 am to ChexMix
quote:
Name the significant losses and who we have to replace them
Nick Marshall - Jeremy Johnson
Cameron AP - Jovon Robinson
Corey Grant - Roc Thomas
Sammie Coates - Ricardo Louis
Quan Bray - Melvin Ray
These are best guesses. Positional battles are what fall practices are for and I'm not an Aubbie.
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:25 am to MightyYat
You must of missed the Forces comment before that
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:25 am to MightyYat
quote:
I forgot that LSU just started having a good defense in 2009. Thanks for that reminder.
you've had a remarkable run of successful defensive coaches, who have also done well elsewhere.
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:26 am to Nguyening
Have they ever hired a true "fixer upper" like Steele before?
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:26 am to undecided
Sell, sell sell.!
Two losses at a minimum. Lsu is a 4 loss team.
Sep 5 MCNS 7:30-SECN Tickets
Sep 12 @MSST 9:15-ESPN Tickets
Sep 19 AUB 3:30 Tickets
Sep 26 @SYR TBD Tickets
Oct 3 EMU TBD Tickets
Oct 10 @SCAR TBD Tickets
Oct 17 FLA TBD Tickets
Oct 24 WKU TBD Tickets
Lsu fans will be like
Two losses at a minimum. Lsu is a 4 loss team.
Sep 5 MCNS 7:30-SECN Tickets
Sep 12 @MSST 9:15-ESPN Tickets
Sep 19 AUB 3:30 Tickets
Sep 26 @SYR TBD Tickets
Oct 3 EMU TBD Tickets
Oct 10 @SCAR TBD Tickets
Oct 17 FLA TBD Tickets
Oct 24 WKU TBD Tickets
Lsu fans will be like
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:33 am to spacewrangler
Sell. LSU will still have its boring, predictable offense and its defense will not be as good as last year.
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:40 am to undecided
Honest answer.
They have no excuse outside of a possible loss to a good auneck team. All they need is average QB play in order to be an 800 llb gorilla this year. Scary good at WR, heisman caliber RB, all world secondary and the drive to get it done point to a possible championship year on the bayou. frick em but they win at least 11 this year.
They have no excuse outside of a possible loss to a good auneck team. All they need is average QB play in order to be an 800 llb gorilla this year. Scary good at WR, heisman caliber RB, all world secondary and the drive to get it done point to a possible championship year on the bayou. frick em but they win at least 11 this year.
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:41 am to therick711
quote:
I don't understand why people don't fricking get analogies. I'm comparing the reasoning. Why are people so stupid when an analogy is used?
If I said that the earth revolves around the sun just as the moon does around the earth, would you seriously come in here like a fricktard and say "are you seriously comparing a moon to a planet?" I'm sure you probably would, but that is why you look stupid when you do it.
So now that that is clear, please explain to me what it is about analogies that makes it hard for you to understand. Analogies are supposed to make parallel reasoning easier to understand.
Your analogy for the analogy is not apples to apples. Marshall should be easily replaced by any half way decent QB. Tebow was the GOAT. Sorry the UF fans you spoke with were idiots, but that doesn't apply to Auburn's situation.
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:43 am to CrimsonChin
quote:
They have no excuse outside of a possible loss to a good auneck team. All they need is average QB play in order to be an 800 llb gorilla this year. Scary good at WR, heisman caliber RB, all world secondary and the drive to get it done point to a possible championship year on the bayou. frick em but they win at least 11 this year.
When did this dumbassery become a thing?
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:47 am to Pettifogger
Altie started it years ago on the scout forum. I just use it to bait him into a response. Nothing funnier than an altimer rant.
This post was edited on 7/10/15 at 9:56 am
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:49 am to DhanTigers212
quote:
LSU would of had all the momentum going into arky and LSU is the ones in the SEC championship game so don't act like LSU is some nobody with 5 losses.
This is false. LSU beating Bama would of clinched the Sec west for MSU. If you're going to make a stupid argument at least make it factual.
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:58 am to CrimsonChin
quote:
CrimsonChin
This cat REALLY hates LSU
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:58 am to Oxford
quote:
@SC @Syracuse - Tossups
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:01 am to Farmer1906
quote:
Your analogy for the analogy is not apples to apples. Marshall should be easily replaced by any half way decent QB. Tebow was the GOAT. Sorry the UF fans you spoke with were idiots, but that doesn't apply to Auburn's situation.
This is unreal given I just explained what I was doing. It is parallel reasoning. Compare the reasoning! I basically burned you up for how stupid your comment was and then you posted the same thing making the same mistake again! Too funny. Try to compare the reasoning this time and tell me what you come up with.
If you want to share a laugh, check out the opinions in these beauts on Brantley
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 7/10/15 at 10:10 am
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:02 am to Rayburn8
If LSU beats Alabama and Arkansas, they finish in a 3-way tie for first with Alabama and Miss State.
Three-Team Tie (or more)
If three teams (or more) are tied for a division title, the following procedure will be used in the following order: (Note: If one of the procedures results in one team being eliminated and two remaining, the two-team tiebreaker procedure as stated in No. 1 above will be used):
A. Combined head-to-head record among the tied teams
Bama 1-1, LSU 1-1, MSU 1-1
B. Record of the tied teams within the division
Bama 6-2, LSU 6-2, MSU 6-2
C. Head-to-head competition against the team within the division with the best overall Conference record (divisional and non-divisional) and proceeding through the division (multiple ties within the division will be broken from first to last and a tie for first place will be broken before a tie for fourth place)
v. Ole Miss
LSU - W
Bama - L
Miss St - L
Three-Team Tie (or more)
If three teams (or more) are tied for a division title, the following procedure will be used in the following order: (Note: If one of the procedures results in one team being eliminated and two remaining, the two-team tiebreaker procedure as stated in No. 1 above will be used):
A. Combined head-to-head record among the tied teams
Bama 1-1, LSU 1-1, MSU 1-1
B. Record of the tied teams within the division
Bama 6-2, LSU 6-2, MSU 6-2
C. Head-to-head competition against the team within the division with the best overall Conference record (divisional and non-divisional) and proceeding through the division (multiple ties within the division will be broken from first to last and a tie for first place will be broken before a tie for fourth place)
v. Ole Miss
LSU - W
Bama - L
Miss St - L
This post was edited on 7/10/15 at 10:03 am
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:05 am to undecided
Getting a nice little tan with all the sunshine pumpers in this thread
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:06 am to Rayburn8
quote:
This is false. LSU beating Bama would of clinched the Sec west for MSU. If you're going to make a stupid argument at least make it factual.
I know this was a big "IF" thing but in this situation LSU would have won the tie breaker. I am not about to explain to you why. Since you wanted to call me out on this you can go and look up why LSU would have won the tie breaker
This post was edited on 7/10/15 at 10:07 am
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:07 am to chilge1
quote:
If LSU beats Alabama and Arkansas
But y'all didnt
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News