Favorite team:Air Force 
Location:South
Biography:
Interests:Dominating in football
Occupation:
Number of Posts:26096
Registered on:1/2/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
His legacy is as follows:

Neocon legend
Ran a vp committee that selected him
Shot guy in face who then had to apologize to him
Became a liberal icon
quote:

When have they voted to remove the filibuster on legislation in those 30 years?


Democrats were the architects of using reconciliation to jam the ACA through. The express purpose was to avoid the filibuster. It's been done and we are all worse for it. To answer the question, 2010 when they changed the rules to do this.
quote:

Can you point me to the declaration of war for either?


We've already had this thread and answered all of these questions. It is done by presidential declaration which was already done, it isn't reviewable by courts, it doesn't require a declaration of war, they can challenge their particular designation according to the Supreme Court.

READ IT HERE

and here is just one thread where you made all the same arguments.
Bye. You don't care about that election. No need to clutter this up with your move on bullshite, Mr. Above the Fray. You keep posting here only to derail the discussion. Come back when you have proof supporting your theory on the outlier totals.
Cool. So no need to gatekeep in a thread that doesn't interest you. Bye.
Repeating a gaslight refrain doesn't make you persuasive. It's actually a bad look. Present any and all proof that cheating would also include any or all down ballot races.
There is proof. You are allowed to reject it, although it's pretty dumb to do so. But you can't gaslight people into ignoring the vote breaks in swing states and outlier vote totals and results that are statistically crazy and not repeatable.
Because there's actually no proof for your hypothesis.
Sure it is. You're alleging the outlier was another cause. You have the burden of proof.

Just present the proof not the regurgitated rationalizations with no empirical data.
I didn't say I didn't understand. I said present any and all evidence supporting your supposition.
The gaslighting worked real well. People confidently parrot lies as truth to avoid cognitive dissonance. Sure were a lot of people that paid heavy legal prices for questioning the state narrative on the election. I wonder why?
Present any and all evidence that people were laser focused on the election and voted against Trump in outlier numbers.
quote:

Your post makes no sense. If you find some proof please present it.


I can't understand it for you. You'll have to figure out the difference between a recount and a forensic analysis that identifies fraudulent ballots.
quote:

All polling information told you Trump was going to lose, you just didn’t believe it.


Just like in 2016, right? Trump is a known Bradley effect candidate. Biden, on the other hand, does worse in national elections. Except one time. Interesting.
quote:

Sweet. Keep talking about 2020 forever. It will never land and it will never be effective as a political strategy. I guess you like to lose.


If voting mattered, your globalist overlords wouldn't let you do it.
You have no more evidence for this than the equally plausible and statistically supported theory that a fraud operation rigged the election.
Thanks totalitarian gatekeeper. I think truth as an end in and of itself is worth defending. I won't repeat the totalitarian lie you apparently are eager to swallow.
I'm actually aware of what they did. They recounted. That's not what's at issue. If you have 10 oranges and 10 bananas you called oranges, counting them up gives you 20. You have to segregate the bananas and subtract them from the total.
What's interesting is how effective the Soviet propaganda technique has been on this issue. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was particularly insightful on this front. Totalitarian propaganda forces people to repeat lies, which serves to humiliate them and break their integrity. By compelling citizens to participate in falsehoods, the state achieves control not just politically, but over their very souls.

So we still have gatekeepers parroting the Marxist lie of no proof.