Started By
Message
re: Bowls Based on BCS Rankings
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:08 pm to USMC Gators
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:08 pm to USMC Gators
It does in this example.
0
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:32 pm to TwelfthMan
Twelfth man: it's the cotton bowl don't get so excited. We beat you on your home field and you people think you are the next dynasty of college football because you beat a tired wounded Alabama team a week after they played in a war against lsu. Has the faggies ever played in a bcs bowl? Answer no. As for as the tiger fans are concerned it was bcs or bust that is our players and fans expectations not the cotton bowl where you play overrated teams with weird traditions like a&m
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:33 pm to vincejr
Actually they did play in the Jan 99 Sugar Bowl.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:46 pm to geauxranger54
quote:
1 ND vs 2 Bama BCS Title
3 Florida vs 4 Oregon Sugar
5 KSU vs 7 UGA Rose
6 Stanford vs 8 LSU Orange
9 TAMU Vs South Carolina 10 Fiesta
Hell of a lot better than what we have. This year's matchups are almost all shite matchups IMO.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:51 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Those matchups would certainly put some butts in the seats.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 9:53 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Those matchups would certainly put some butts in the seats.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:14 pm to geauxranger54
BCSCG: Notre Dame vs Alabama
Rose: Ohio State vs Stanford
Fiesta: Kansas State vs Oregon
Sugar: Florida vs Oklahoma
Orange: Florida State vs Georgia
Keeping relevant tie-ins and sufficiently highly ranked conference champions without overloading the BCS with SEC teams. I'd watch all of these games.
Major SEC non-BCS bowls...
Capital One: Texas A&M vs Nebraska
Cotton: LSU vs Texas
Outback: South Carolina vs Michigan
Chik-Fil-A: Vanderbilt vs Clemson
Rose: Ohio State vs Stanford
Fiesta: Kansas State vs Oregon
Sugar: Florida vs Oklahoma
Orange: Florida State vs Georgia
Keeping relevant tie-ins and sufficiently highly ranked conference champions without overloading the BCS with SEC teams. I'd watch all of these games.
Major SEC non-BCS bowls...
Capital One: Texas A&M vs Nebraska
Cotton: LSU vs Texas
Outback: South Carolina vs Michigan
Chik-Fil-A: Vanderbilt vs Clemson
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:28 pm to lsutothetop
I like that list.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:45 pm to geauxranger54
quote:
What if bowls were based on rankings?
quote:
What would your matchups be?
Posted on 12/28/12 at 12:02 am to vincejr
quote:while flaming, try your best to be accurate you retard
Has the faggies ever played in a bcs bowl? Answer no
and how in the world is OU more deserving of a bcs bowl than us?
Posted on 12/28/12 at 9:18 am to geauxranger54
Bama vs Patriots, Title game
Aggies vs Texas, Cotton Bowl
Florida vs Ohio State, Sugar Bowl
Bama vs Oregon, Rose Bowl
Auburn vs Falcons, Peach Bowl
Tennessee vs Green Bay, Orange Bowl
Aggies vs Texas, Cotton Bowl
Florida vs Ohio State, Sugar Bowl
Bama vs Oregon, Rose Bowl
Auburn vs Falcons, Peach Bowl
Tennessee vs Green Bay, Orange Bowl
Posted on 12/28/12 at 9:25 am to geauxranger54
The game I really would like to see is Texas A&M vs. Oregon. That game would have been really fun to watch.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 10:06 am to WestCoastAg
The aggies beat 1 team that ended the regular season ranked. Grant it, they did beat the then number 1 team in the country, but they've done before. They beat OU back in the early 2000s with Reggie McNeal, and I'm pretty sure OU was number 1 at the time. But now things are different. What gives Aggies, because yall haven't beat anyone else worth a shite. The fact that Arkansas and Auburn are the worst they've been in decades does not make your 3rd place SEC West finish very impressive to me. Congrats on finishing above the Mississippi schools though. The rest of the SEC has been doing that for years. But 5th overall in the SEC is closer to middle of the road than the top. But y'all act like y'all have run through the SEC destroying everyone in your path.
This post was edited on 12/28/12 at 10:07 am
Posted on 12/28/12 at 10:08 am to DaleDenton
quote:
teams should be rewarded for winning their conferences
very doubtful that was your stance last season
troll
Posted on 12/28/12 at 10:39 am to BeaumontBengal
I agree. I don't fault TAMU fans for being excited, but with the way that they talk, you would think that they had won a national championship after the 1939 season.
That being said out of the bowl pick that I originally posted, I think a TAMU KSU matchup would be nice to see as well. 2 Heisman Finalist Qbs going head to head.
That being said out of the bowl pick that I originally posted, I think a TAMU KSU matchup would be nice to see as well. 2 Heisman Finalist Qbs going head to head.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 11:14 am to geauxranger54
Those would be some fine games! 
Posted on 12/28/12 at 11:22 am to DaleDenton
quote:
I think the bowls are fine the way they are, teams should be rewarded for winning their conferences, not riding the coat tails of other conference members up the BCS rankings.
So Arkansas totally won the SEC to make it to the Sugar Bowl in 2010/2011 right?
This post was edited on 12/28/12 at 11:24 am
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News