Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:07 pm to WG_Dawg
I mean, his little scenario had 3 SEC teams, and if you're gonna use BCS rankings for BCS bowls, there are 3 SEC teams ranked ahead of LSU.
This doesn't mean I think Georgia is better than LSU.
This doesn't mean I think Georgia is better than LSU.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:08 pm to KajunGator
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:10 pm to JDM1992
So you're justifying 5 two loss teams over a one loss UF how? Because the dawg said so?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:11 pm to KajunGator
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:12 pm to KajunGator
quote:
So you're justifying 5 two loss teams over a one loss UF how? Because the dawg said so?
No, because there should be some sort of reward for winning our division and playing for the SEC. We beat UF head to head, and both teams ended the regular season 11-1. Why should UF get rewarded with a Sugar Bowl and us with the capital one simply because we had a better season?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:12 pm to DaleDenton
Of course you would think that way. Just like Arky earned that arse whoopin from Ohio State in the sugar bowl. That's what the current format rewards fans with.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:17 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
No, because there should be some sort of reward for winning our division and playing for the SEC
There was....the SECCG. You win that you could have played for the BCS Championship.
quote:
We beat UF head to head, and both teams ended the regular season 11-1.
That you did
quote:
Why should UF get rewarded with a Sugar Bowl and us with the capital one simply because we had a better season?
You DIDN'T have the better season. You said yourself we both ended 11-1.
And these hypothetical bowls are based on BCS rank, of which UF is higher than UGA. So UF goes to a BCS bowl...which we do, and UGA watches us from their couch....which you can, if you want.
This post was edited on 12/27/12 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:18 pm to TwelfthMan
quote:
TwelfthMan
How did that work out for yall when you played LSU? Twelth man my arse.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:19 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Why should UF get rewarded with a Sugar Bowl and us with the capital one simply because we had a better season?
LSU had a better season than UGA and A&M and both of yall are in better bowls than us ...
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:22 pm to LaBornNRaised
quote:
LSU had a better season than UGA
How so? We finished the regular season with a better record, and finished the whole season with an equal record yet we won our division. The only possible, conceivable way you could say LSU had a better season was because they had a "better" loss than us, which is a stupid way of determining who had a better season.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:31 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
LSU had a better season than UGA and A&M and both of yall are in better bowls than us ...
That's highly debatable.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:40 pm to TwelfthMan
quote:
Cotton Bowl tickets are expensive and selling well. I think you can donate cans of food to get chick fil a bowl tickets.
Yeah I remember when Arky fans were puffing out there chests for 3 rd place in the west and 5th place overall in the SEC. Congrats on being the new Arky.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:44 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
How so? We finished the regular season with a better record, and finished the whole season with an equal record yet we won our division. The only possible, conceivable way you could say LSU had a better season was because they had a "better" loss than us, which is a stupid way of determining who had a better season.
What? Having a better loss is the only reason Bama played in the BCSCG last year.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:47 pm to John Maplethorpe
quote:
That's highly debatable.
No it's not. We beat you at A&M. You lost to 2/3 of the good teams you played.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:51 pm to Rickdaddy4188
No losing at the right time was why bama was in the natty last year.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:52 pm to John Maplethorpe
LSU was 2nd in the West. A&m 3rd. Last I checked 2nd is better than 3rd. Just because LSU fans are disappointed in 2nd and A&M fans are ecstatic with 3rd does not mean A&M had a better year. You also needed a heisman winner to come in 3rd place in the West, 5th overall in the SEC. Think about that for a little while when you think your season was so great.
This post was edited on 12/27/12 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:59 pm to BeaumontBengal
quote:
LSU was 2nd in the West. A&m 3rd. Last I checked 2nd is better than 3rd. Just because LSU fans are disappointed in 2nd and A&M fans are ecstatic with 3rd does not mean A&M had a better year. You also needed a heisman winner to come in 3rd place in the West, 5th overall in th SEC. Think about that for a little while when you think your season was so great.
My thoughts exactly
Posted on 12/27/12 at 6:05 pm to LSU Tiger 216
Gee, all the other conferences would not get a fair chance to play in a big time bowl. 
Screw that. This would be great for CFB. Change the 2 BCS per conference limit to no limit. The only rule I would have is for teams that played during the year couldn't play each other in a BCS bowl unless it's for the NC of course.
Screw that. This would be great for CFB. Change the 2 BCS per conference limit to no limit. The only rule I would have is for teams that played during the year couldn't play each other in a BCS bowl unless it's for the NC of course.
This post was edited on 12/27/12 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 12/27/12 at 6:25 pm to Patton
quote:
No losing at the right time was why bama was in the natty last year.
Wrong. What time you lose clearly doesn't matter anymore.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News