Started By
Message
re: Belichick to UNC is really about UNC transitioning to the SEC or B10
Posted on 12/11/24 at 2:43 pm to 3down10
Posted on 12/11/24 at 2:43 pm to 3down10
quote:
Did you ever notice how many great players Brady had around him? Do you know why?
so explain how he is well under .500 without Brady?
This post was edited on 12/11/24 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 12/11/24 at 2:44 pm to MtVernon
quote:
Would the SEC really kill for UNC?
I would rather have Memphis and Tulane than I would UNC.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 2:45 pm to Shaft Williams
UNC doesnt care about football at all. Its in their culture. If Belechick indeed changes that, it will propel them to the SEC.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 2:47 pm to Landmass
Memphis and Tulane both probably care more. Memphis for sure.
I tell this to people all the time, its night and day what people in NC care about CFB compared to SC and idk quite why pther than Basketball I know I know.
But NC State seems to care more than UNC fan wise atm
I tell this to people all the time, its night and day what people in NC care about CFB compared to SC and idk quite why pther than Basketball I know I know.
But NC State seems to care more than UNC fan wise atm
Posted on 12/11/24 at 2:51 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
so explain how he is well under .500 without Brady?
No idea what was going on there his final few years, but it certainly wasn't always the case. They were ahead of everyone when it came to drafting, getting the right guys and so on.
Like I said, if it was so easy why didn't anyone else do it? Just because you can point to certain things doesn't mean it's easy to do. Do you think people have never wasted a QB with the talent of Brady?
Posted on 12/11/24 at 3:02 pm to 3down10
quote:
Like I said, if it was so easy why didn't anyone else do it?
TB did it

Posted on 12/11/24 at 3:05 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
TB did it ....................TB.
Well, enjoy your narrative I guess.

Posted on 12/11/24 at 3:06 pm to 3down10
quote:
Well, enjoy your narrative I guess.
That's the thing. It's not a narrative. It is factually based.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 3:07 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
That's the thing. It's not a narrative. It is factually based.

How many different QB's does a coach need to win SB's with before he is a good caoch?
This post was edited on 12/11/24 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 12/11/24 at 3:09 pm to 3down10
quote:
How many different QB's does a coach need to win SB's with before he is a good caoch?
not sure. I do know well below .500 with every other QB makes you a mediocre, at best, HC.
ETA IF saban had a good 4 year run with one QB, and was below .500 with every other QB, would he be the "Goat"?
This post was edited on 12/11/24 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 12/11/24 at 3:33 pm to Miznoz
quote:
it also specifies two entirely separate staffs, one for football, one for recruiting.
I like
Posted on 12/11/24 at 3:41 pm to Shaft Williams
We could trade Alabama for UNC. Alabama wants to go to the ACC so they can be guaranteed a playoff spot every year.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 3:48 pm to Landmass
quote:
I would rather have Memphis and Tulane than I would UNC.
I hope what you are trying to say here is hell no to UNC.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 5:05 pm to MtVernon
Bringing Saban in as his DC?
Posted on 12/11/24 at 5:10 pm to MtVernon
quote:
Would the SEC really kill for UNC?
They bring as much as Texas did.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 5:15 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
TB did it ....................TB.
Bucs had a good team that was largely missing just a QB. Great defense, good WRs. Bring in Brady and Gronk and it’s just unfair. Not trying to diminish Brady’s contributions, just wanted to point that out.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 5:15 pm to Shaft Williams
They aren't coming to the sec. Maybe NC State.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 5:19 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
They bring as much as Texas did.
So they would be tied with Texas as highest revenue generator in the SEC?
Posted on 12/11/24 at 5:33 pm to MtVernon
3 years $30 million
How you gonna convince recruits you will be there for four years
How you gonna convince recruits you will be there for four years
Posted on 12/11/24 at 6:03 pm to CNB
quote:
Bucs had a good team that was largely missing just a QB. Great defense, good WRs. Bring in Brady and Gronk and it’s just unfair. Not trying to diminish Brady’s contributions, just wanted to point that out.
And Brady was a better qb when he had gronk.
Popular
Back to top
