Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:21 pm to WDE24
All I'm getting from this thread is that LSU is mad that they don't have a rival.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:21 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
You need to go to the Tiger Rant and spew your entitlement there. This is the SECrant
SECrant is still part of an LSU site. Good try though.
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:21 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
It just shows that the rivalry games really aren't that important when Missouri is in the East.
Well this is based on the presumption that Missouri has been playing a team since 1901 that will end because they are in the east.
You are confusing the definition of a rivalry.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:22 pm to Lee County Tiger
quote:
All I'm getting from this thread is that LSU is mad that they don't have a rival.
How many rivals is everyone else allowed to have? Because UGA is rivals with UF.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:22 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
And I answered no
That's real nice, but I was kinda talking about the real LSU contingency, like the coach and AD.. You know they would be tempted.. but they wouldn't want Vandy every year, would they?
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:22 pm to BrerTiger
Tweet from yesterday:
Simple solution
No division changes, just no permanents except those four
quote:
Joe Schad: SEC looking at model where UGA-AUB and Bama-Tenn play every year but others rotate
Simple solution
No division changes, just no permanents except those four
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:22 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Under the OP's scenario, you wouldn't.
there isn't a chance in hell it ever happens though
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:23 pm to getback
quote:
That's real nice, but I was kinda talking about the real LSU contingency, like the coach and AD.. You know they would be tempted.. but they wouldn't want Vandy every year, would they?
Pretty sure they were arguing in favor if either having a 6-2 or only having your west division schedule count for purposes of making the title game. I agree with the former.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:23 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
there isn't a chance in hell it ever happens though
Which only serves to show the hypocrisy of everyone calling LSU fans scared.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:24 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Simple solution
No division changes, just no permanents except those four
Sounds good to me.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:24 pm to Crowknowsbest
I like how only LSU fans are in support of the OPs plan, but I digress...
FTR, if that was the only way to save our rivalry games, I would be all for it.
FTR, if that was the only way to save our rivalry games, I would be all for it.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:24 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Sounds good to me.
Even more simple, Move UT to the West.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:25 pm to CBandits82
quote:
SECrant is still part of an LSU site. Good try though.
GTFO Noob.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:25 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
I would actually like to play teams like UGA more. Rotation offers that. Permanent doesn't.
So would I.
But this concept of Auburn, Alabama and Georgia having 2 rivals that they absolutely must play every year isn't new.
It's been a known non-negotiable since day one.
We can arrange the divisions however we like or have no divisions at all but if those schools can't have their 2 rivalry games every year then the conference will fall apart.
Flame them all you want for it but it's the worst kept secret in all of college football.
It's not negotiable.
If LSU really doesn't like it, we should just find another conference. Because we don't have the voting block to change it. And even if we did, I'll bet those three schools would secede and bolt the SEC before they'd give up those rivalry games.
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:25 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Which only serves to show the hypocrisy of everyone calling LSU fans scared.
how so
quote:
brer
this guy gets it
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:25 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Simple solution
No division changes, just no permanents except those four
Perfect, but seems complicated
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:25 pm to therick711
quote:
Even more simple, Move UT to the West.
This makes more sense to me.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:25 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
I like how only LSU fans are in support of the OPs plan, but I digress...
I'm not even a proponent of it, I just think what it highlights is the hypocrisy of the fanbases in this debate. Nothing more.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 5:26 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:This is all you are really worried about isn't it? Your fan manhood has been challenged and you won't stand for it (or for playing a harder cross divisional schedule than Ole Miss).
Which only serves to show the hypocrisy of everyone calling LSU fans scared.
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 5:26 pm
Page 16 of 27
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News