
Started By
Message
re: Been watching Josh Pate's show on YouTube
Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:39 am to PeleofAnalytics
Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:39 am to PeleofAnalytics
quote:
quote:
Just change to name of the segment to accurately portray what it actually is
The JP Power Rating
I'm not sure more than 1 or 2 people really think they are being misled when they watch this.
Disagree
Every week it's the same script with nearly half of the segment dedicated to debating that the "poll" is actually a "computer generated power rating"
Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:43 am to theCAW
In his defense he put a clown nose on after the season and roasted himself on his show for those rankings 
Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:52 am to Hback
Brookes Austin. The only one of these talking head homos that actually breaks down film and tells you why your team is fricking up.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:55 am to Neutral_Observer
Cole Cubelic is great too, especially at reviewing performance at the line of scrimmage. It's a shame ESPN doesn't push him more.
Pate is a personality. I enjoy him. But it isn't hard hitting analysis.
Pate is a personality. I enjoy him. But it isn't hard hitting analysis.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:17 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
quote:
Enjoy his college football content, however his weekly in-season "JP Poll" schtick is getting old
Pate intentionally engages/debates with viewers who challenge the "poll's" output
Ironically, the "JP Poll" isn't a poll, it's a computer model power rating
Yet instead of simply changing the name to the "JP Power Rating", Pate goes to great lengths debating viewers who are naive enough to believe the title of the segment ...
"JP Poll Release"
Again, no one is polled ... leading to what I believe to be as an intentional misnomer to create debate and belittle viewers
Enjoy your show JP but meemaw would be disappointed
He didn't create the concept of "Computer Polls" in college football. They were called that during the BCS for example. Back in the day they were called "math polls" when done manually.
You're right semantically, but kind of wrong when it comes to college football history.
I agree the power rating would make more sense, but I understand what it is, so never really cared.
However, I disagree that changing the name would prevent viewers from not understanding the difference. Because he says directly that's what it is and they still complain. I see people on this website who straight up can't handle the concept of power rankings vs season rankings.
I don't watch him, but I catch the occasional clip here and there. Usually seems pretty solid to me. I like watching film breakdowns much more, even for other teams.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 3:05 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Josh Pate doesn’t often agree with Josh Pate.
He’s low quality entertainment, not expert analysis.
He’s low quality entertainment, not expert analysis.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 3:27 am to Gatorbait2008
quote:
Josh Pete is my go to. He seems unbiased and knows his shite. He does not just pick games, he explains why he thinks that will be the result.
He seems to go against Missouri. I don’t like what he does so far.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 3:51 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Every time I listen to Pate’s show and it’s over, I wonder what I knowledge or value just gained by listening to it. He straddles the fence on pretty much everything.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:34 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Every time I listen to Pate’s show and it’s over, I wonder what I knowledge or value just gained by listening to it. He straddles the fence on pretty much everything.
I enjoy the show
Just take issue with calling something a "poll", when obviously it's a computer model power rating
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:49 pm to Neutral_Observer
Why?
Ever since he got Academy as a sponsor and started pumping A&M, he lost his credibility.
Landon Tengwall's College Football Show
The talking head shows is the SECRANT for people that can't read, more comedy than content.
Ever since he got Academy as a sponsor and started pumping A&M, he lost his credibility.
quote:Landon Tengwall's show on YouTube is similar to Brook's show, with game film analysis.
Brookes Austin. The only one of these talking head homos that actually breaks down film and tells you why your team is fricking up.
Landon Tengwall's College Football Show
The talking head shows is the SECRANT for people that can't read, more comedy than content.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:02 pm to Gatorbait2008
quote:
Josh Pete is my go to. He seems unbiased and knows his shite. He does not just pick games, he explains why he thinks that will be the result.
I dunno. I get the feeling he wants us to think he’s unbiased to keep all fans engaged. I watch his show sometimes. He’s not too bad compared to others.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:15 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Every time I listen to Pate’s show and it’s over, I wonder what I knowledge or value just gained by listening to it. He straddles the fence on pretty much everything.
Agreed. I understand being somewhat neutral and respectful but it just ends up sounding non-committal. Like he’s so afraid of him saying Team A will lose big might be a soundbite if they win.
So by the end of the segment you’re somehow still wondering who he even predicts is going to be the winner before he says so without any conviction.
2nd Brooks Austin. If you want to actually learn why a team is having success and a deeper analysis of matchups, check him out.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:33 pm to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Been listening to him for years. He claims to be impartial but he can’t hide his love for bama. It’s wild how much he strokes them off.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:39 pm to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
His fondness for corporate speak and business jargon is the reason I stopped watching.
From a 50,000 foot view, there's not enough syergy in the program's culture and they need to do a better job onboarding their new portal players.. Circle back and put a pin on it.
From a 50,000 foot view, there's not enough syergy in the program's culture and they need to do a better job onboarding their new portal players.. Circle back and put a pin on it.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:42 pm to dhuck20
quote:
2nd Brooks Austin. If you want to actually learn why a team is having success and a deeper analysis of matchups, check him out.
Brooks respects and admires Josh Pate.
But he rips his methods routinely (without referencing the take).
I make predictions, and I will get them wrong. Come at me when I deserve it.
I make predictions that are awful, throw the sink at me.
But if you learn anything from my show, like/subscribe/and come back for more tomorrow.
If you want wishy washy analysis, you can have Josh Pate and Ali Peek shows.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:40 pm to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Love Pate, Klatt and Andy/Ari. Most of the others are homerish and tiresome.

Popular
Back to top

0










