Started By
Message

re: Been watching Josh Pate's show on YouTube

Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:39 am to
Posted by GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Member since Dec 2014
2594 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:39 am to
quote:

quote:
Just change to name of the segment to accurately portray what it actually is

The JP Power Rating

I'm not sure more than 1 or 2 people really think they are being misled when they watch this.


Disagree

Every week it's the same script with nearly half of the segment dedicated to debating that the "poll" is actually a "computer generated power rating"
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
78966 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:43 am to
In his defense he put a clown nose on after the season and roasted himself on his show for those rankings
Posted by Neutral_Observer
Member since Sep 2026
380 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:52 am to
Brookes Austin. The only one of these talking head homos that actually breaks down film and tells you why your team is fricking up.
Posted by generalgator87
Member since Nov 2022
757 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 10:55 am to
Cole Cubelic is great too, especially at reviewing performance at the line of scrimmage. It's a shame ESPN doesn't push him more.

Pate is a personality. I enjoy him. But it isn't hard hitting analysis.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
40675 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:17 am to
quote:

Enjoy his college football content, however his weekly in-season "JP Poll" schtick is getting old

Pate intentionally engages/debates with viewers who challenge the "poll's" output

Ironically, the "JP Poll" isn't a poll, it's a computer model power rating

Yet instead of simply changing the name to the "JP Power Rating", Pate goes to great lengths debating viewers who are naive enough to believe the title of the segment ...
"JP Poll Release"

Again, no one is polled ... leading to what I believe to be as an intentional misnomer to create debate and belittle viewers

Enjoy your show JP but meemaw would be disappointed



He didn't create the concept of "Computer Polls" in college football. They were called that during the BCS for example. Back in the day they were called "math polls" when done manually.

You're right semantically, but kind of wrong when it comes to college football history.

I agree the power rating would make more sense, but I understand what it is, so never really cared.

However, I disagree that changing the name would prevent viewers from not understanding the difference. Because he says directly that's what it is and they still complain. I see people on this website who straight up can't handle the concept of power rankings vs season rankings.

I don't watch him, but I catch the occasional clip here and there. Usually seems pretty solid to me. I like watching film breakdowns much more, even for other teams.
Posted by QBUMizzou
North of the Mason Dixon line
Member since Nov 2013
1087 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 3:05 am to
Josh Pate doesn’t often agree with Josh Pate.

He’s low quality entertainment, not expert analysis.
Posted by TrueLefty
St. Louis County
Member since Oct 2017
19309 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 3:27 am to
quote:

Josh Pete is my go to. He seems unbiased and knows his shite. He does not just pick games, he explains why he thinks that will be the result.

He seems to go against Missouri. I don’t like what he does so far.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
23066 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 3:51 am to
Every time I listen to Pate’s show and it’s over, I wonder what I knowledge or value just gained by listening to it. He straddles the fence on pretty much everything.
Posted by GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Member since Dec 2014
2594 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Every time I listen to Pate’s show and it’s over, I wonder what I knowledge or value just gained by listening to it. He straddles the fence on pretty much everything.


I enjoy the show

Just take issue with calling something a "poll", when obviously it's a computer model power rating
Posted by Ptins944
Member since Jan 2019
2236 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:49 pm to
Why?

Ever since he got Academy as a sponsor and started pumping A&M, he lost his credibility.
quote:

Brookes Austin. The only one of these talking head homos that actually breaks down film and tells you why your team is fricking up.
Landon Tengwall's show on YouTube is similar to Brook's show, with game film analysis.

Landon Tengwall's College Football Show

The talking head shows is the SECRANT for people that can't read, more comedy than content.
Posted by Boomer65
Norman
Member since Sep 2022
1422 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Josh Pete is my go to. He seems unbiased and knows his shite. He does not just pick games, he explains why he thinks that will be the result.


I dunno. I get the feeling he wants us to think he’s unbiased to keep all fans engaged. I watch his show sometimes. He’s not too bad compared to others.
Posted by dhuck20
SCLSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
23653 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Every time I listen to Pate’s show and it’s over, I wonder what I knowledge or value just gained by listening to it. He straddles the fence on pretty much everything.

Agreed. I understand being somewhat neutral and respectful but it just ends up sounding non-committal. Like he’s so afraid of him saying Team A will lose big might be a soundbite if they win.

So by the end of the segment you’re somehow still wondering who he even predicts is going to be the winner before he says so without any conviction.

2nd Brooks Austin. If you want to actually learn why a team is having success and a deeper analysis of matchups, check him out.
Posted by Cknsnghtmre
Member since Sep 2026
316 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:33 pm to
Been listening to him for years. He claims to be impartial but he can’t hide his love for bama. It’s wild how much he strokes them off.
Posted by Violent Hip Swivel
Member since Aug 2023
10536 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:39 pm to
His fondness for corporate speak and business jargon is the reason I stopped watching.

From a 50,000 foot view, there's not enough syergy in the program's culture and they need to do a better job onboarding their new portal players.. Circle back and put a pin on it.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
27518 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

2nd Brooks Austin. If you want to actually learn why a team is having success and a deeper analysis of matchups, check him out.


Brooks respects and admires Josh Pate.
But he rips his methods routinely (without referencing the take).

I make predictions, and I will get them wrong. Come at me when I deserve it.
I make predictions that are awful, throw the sink at me.
But if you learn anything from my show, like/subscribe/and come back for more tomorrow.

If you want wishy washy analysis, you can have Josh Pate and Ali Peek shows.
Posted by Hornish Kin
Member since Jul 2022
207 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:40 pm to
Love Pate, Klatt and Andy/Ari. Most of the others are homerish and tiresome.
Posted by 4quartaBamaball
Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Nov 2015
2160 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 7:16 pm to
He's a dork
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter