Started By
Message
As much as I would love to laugh at LSU, they are never getting expelled
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:54 pm
This filing has 1 simple explanation: the SEC wants to prevent Kiffin from adding Wright/Harris midseason.
Kiffin said he will follow the ruling, but he has never publicly said he agrees that the rules mean he can’t add players later. He left 2 roster spots open, and it wouldn’t surprise me if the SEC expects him to add the players during Ole Miss game week.
As a result, SEC continues the lawsuit until they have a guarantee the players are out for the the year. The meeting on 9/10 is just a way to prove the dispute is ripe for legal adjudication so LSU can’t just kick the can down the road. If the SEC wins in court, I expect LSU to put out a statement that the players aren’t going to be added at any point or that the players have unenrolled from the University, and the matter goes away like Soresby
Kiffin said he will follow the ruling, but he has never publicly said he agrees that the rules mean he can’t add players later. He left 2 roster spots open, and it wouldn’t surprise me if the SEC expects him to add the players during Ole Miss game week.
As a result, SEC continues the lawsuit until they have a guarantee the players are out for the the year. The meeting on 9/10 is just a way to prove the dispute is ripe for legal adjudication so LSU can’t just kick the can down the road. If the SEC wins in court, I expect LSU to put out a statement that the players aren’t going to be added at any point or that the players have unenrolled from the University, and the matter goes away like Soresby
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:55 pm to Dixie.Reb
Yeah I put the odds at them actually getting kicked out at 10%
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:56 pm to Dixie.Reb
If that’s the case Kiffin and LSU have baited the SEC into actually filing lawsuits without ever breaking a rule, and yall think that makes the SEC look good here?
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:56 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Nah, let’s go hard in the paint here.
Kick LSU out.
Kick LSU out.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:56 pm to Dixie.Reb
How bout we lend wright and Harris to each openent until playoffs. Then they play for us. We know some teams could use em.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:57 pm to Dixie.Reb
The university presidents are out for blood, though
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:59 pm to Dixie.Reb
Why does the SEC not care about NCAA ruled ineligible QB playing at Ole Miss?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:59 pm to RB10
quote:
and yall think that makes the SEC look good here?
Why do I care how the sec looks?? I’m not an SEC fan.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:00 pm to The Baker
quote:
The university presidents are out for blood, though
Scared
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:01 pm to RB10
Sec is not trying to “look good” but rather to protect itself and member schools from Kiffen/LSU’s shenanigans. Kiffen/LSU will buckle.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:02 pm to Dixie.Reb
Yep the SEC looks even dumber this week than last. So we’re going to prevent you from breaking a rule that you haven’t broke yet, but we’re going to allow other schools to keep breaking rules? Give me a break lol
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:02 pm to Dixie.Reb
I don’t agree.
The SEC wouldn’t be going to court to obtain legal authority for something they already have the power to do (expel a member school)
Sankey has the votes and the court ruling makes sure LSU can’t file to block the expulsion in a Louisiana court.
Time to get the Big12 or ACC on the phone
The SEC wouldn’t be going to court to obtain legal authority for something they already have the power to do (expel a member school)
Sankey has the votes and the court ruling makes sure LSU can’t file to block the expulsion in a Louisiana court.
Time to get the Big12 or ACC on the phone
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:03 pm to Hornish Kin
quote:
Sec is not trying to “look good” but rather to protect itself and member schools from Kiffen/LSU’s shenanigans. Kiffen/LSU will buckle.
What shenanigans again? Not breaking rules?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:03 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
Sankey has the votes and the court ruling makes sure LSU can’t file to block the expulsion in a Louisiana court.
They have to win that first, which isn’t going to happen.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:04 pm to RB10
quote:
If that’s the case Kiffin and LSU have baited the SEC into actually filing lawsuits without ever breaking a rule, and yall think that makes the SEC look good here
I think looking bad is the whole reason for the suit to begin with? Are you really of the opinion that LSU and Kiffin come out of this looking good?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:04 pm to Dixie.Reb
quote:the problem with this is that LSU was also personally enjoined from taking any actions that negatively impacts the players (paraphrasing). It doesn't require LSU to roster them, but Kiffin/LSU putting it in writing or whatever they'll never play could toe the line of them being sanctioned by the Court.
As a result, SEC continues the lawsuit until they have a guarantee the players are out for the the year. The meeting on 9/10 is just a way to prove the dispute is ripe for legal adjudication so LSU can’t just kick the can down the road. If the SEC wins in court, I expect LSU to put out a statement that the players aren’t going to be added at any point or that the players have unenrolled from the University, and the matter goes away like Soresby
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:04 pm to Dixie.Reb
quote:
He left 2 roster spots open
He held them for these guys, but then decided not to roster them. Is he supposed to fill the spots with members of the student body now?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:05 pm to RB10
quote:
They have to win that first, which isn’t going to happen
In an Alabama federal court?
Come on now.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:05 pm to Crimson K
quote:
I think looking bad is the whole reason for the suit to begin with? Are you really of the opinion that LSU and Kiffin come out of this looking good?
Yes.
They haven’t broken any rules. Are we going to start punishing programs for getting too good even if they operate inside the lines now?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:08 pm to Jack Daniel
ESPN has contractual rights to LSU (because they are in the SEC). If SEC votes LSU out of SEC, ESPN will have something to say overall potential revenue loss.
LSU would then be an independent and would have TV contracts lined up (similar to Notre Dame) etc.,
This really isn't as bad as I thought it would be for LSU.
If I'm LSU, I become an independent and lock up the biggest TV contract in history and schedule cupcakes like ND and walk to the playoff every year.
LSU would then be an independent and would have TV contracts lined up (similar to Notre Dame) etc.,
This really isn't as bad as I thought it would be for LSU.
If I'm LSU, I become an independent and lock up the biggest TV contract in history and schedule cupcakes like ND and walk to the playoff every year.
Back to top


10







