Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:57 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
The committee is a joke and deserves ridicule.
I'm fine with a committee or formula if it was a transparent process, but it's not.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:58 pm to lowspark12
His radio show is boring as f. I don't know why anyone cares what he thinks.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:58 pm to CaptainBrannigan
Does Danny just troll on Twitter now that he was fired from ESPN and can’t do it in real life? What a miserable existence. 
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:00 pm to samson73103
quote:quote:
I can’t imagine anyone NOT having fun at LSU. Best tailgating on the planet
I've had some good times in Tuscaloosa.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:03 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Does Danny just troll on Twitter now that he was fired from ESPN and can’t do it in real life? What a miserable existence
Yes, and Ryen was spot on when he said Danny was just upset because he was planning on trolling bama all night when they got left out and now he cant
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:04 pm to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
If you don't want controversy take care of your business and beat the teams you are supposed to beat.
If only Bama hadn't lost to Auburn......
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:11 pm to AshLSU
quote:
If only Bama hadn't lost to Auburn......
If only OSU hadn't lost to Penn State and Iowa by 31...
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:18 pm to secuniversity
Russillo is exactly right. Kannell is a bitter, angry, little child who didn't get his way and now he wants to throw a tantrum.
He honestly despises the SEC, that he would rather see all of CFB collapse than see the SEC succeed.
He honestly despises the SEC, that he would rather see all of CFB collapse than see the SEC succeed.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:24 pm to im4LSU
quote:
If only OSU hadn't lost to Penn State and Iowa by 31...
Fair point. My argument however has never been about Bama getting in over OSU. I can honestly see a reason for letting either of them in. My issue is with the two teams who got punished for having to play an extra game that Bama did not have to play. One of those teams being Auburn. A team who had already beaten Bama and Georgia and had a close loss with Clemson. Now two of those teams (who Auburn beat) are in and Auburn is not. Meanwhile, Bama gets rewarded for NOT playing a game.
You have to bring up the question. What if Bama had to play that extra game? What if they lost it? Would they be in? The obvious answer is no. But we don't know that they would have lost or won BECAUSE THEY DIDNT HAVE TO PLAY THE GAME.
I honestly DGAF that Bama got in over OSU. My issue with it is that I believe, when healthy, Auburn is without a doubt one of the top 4 teams and I hate Auburn about as much as I do Bama but they did beat two of the teams that are now in the playoffs. The real fricked up thing is, that by how this played out, Auburn could have won that game against Clemson too AND WOULD HAVE STILL BEEN LEFT OUT OF THE PLAYOFFS as a two loss team who didn't win their conference. THAT'S fricked up.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:37 pm to AshLSU
quote:
Auburn is without a doubt one of the top 4 teams
If they were "without a doubt" one of the top 4 teams they would probably have beaten UGA in the title game. They got hot and won 2 games at home, one against a team hit hard with injury. They wouldn't get to play the playoff games at home. Speaking of which, all their 3 losses were on the road. If they were without a doubt one of the 4 best teams in the nation, the wouldn't have played that badly, that often, away from home.
Maybe you just relate to them because of 2011. Not being a smartass. Just an observation.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:43 pm to DirtyDawg
quote:
Danny Kanell can't do math
I mean -
I don't think FSU QBs are required to even take math.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:49 pm to BranchDawg
quote:
nobody but asshurt Auburn and LSU Adams are going to be thinking about the Ohio State debate
I havent seen any AU fans say osu deserved to get in. all I see is a buncha melting uga fans talking out of their arse.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 11:01 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
I'm fine with a committee or formula if it was a transparent process, but it's not.
I am not sure how tranparent something can be, other than their expalanations.
Every year will present something different. Heck, every week does. You can't just say all conference champions, or no one with multiple losses, or can't have 2 from one conference. If you want to have it open to all across the country, you can't put restrictions on who can be included. Imagine a 3 loss Oregon State upsetting an undefeated USCw on a last second FG after the QB was dinged up. Boom, now we have to include Oregon State.
Imagine if Auburn blew out UGA, but no they have 2 losses, got to bring in Central Florida in their spot.
All conferences are not equal, all conference champions are not equal, all 0 or 1 loss teams are not equal, so why treat them that way?
Posted on 12/4/17 at 11:06 pm to secuniversity
Cain's childish clap at the end
Posted on 12/5/17 at 12:42 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
they were "without a doubt" one of the top 4 teams they would probably have beaten UGA in the title game
The same could be said about Bama. If Bama really was a top 4 team, they would have beaten Auburn.
Auburn lost to Georgia in the SECCG because of injuries. Injuries that would have been healed by playoffs. Auburn would have stood a good chance of winning the NC if they were in it and fully healed.
That being said, your argument still doesn't hold up because you didn't play Georgia. They very well could have beaten you in the SECCG thus eliminating Bama from the playoffs. Instead, Bama got a free pass into the playoffs by not having to play that game and an injured Aiburn team got eliminated because they had to play that game.
quote:
Maybe you just relate to them because of 2011. Not being a smartass. Just an observation.
I'm not upset about the 2011 game. I have said here many times that Bama and LSU were without a doubt the two top teams that year. Both were absurdly loaded with talent. Both were extremely good teams. Saban just changed his game plan and Miles did not. Bama totally deserved that win.
This post was edited on 12/5/17 at 12:46 am
Posted on 12/5/17 at 12:45 am to im4LSU
Well Kanell is a dumbass if he really thought Alabama wasn't going to get in.
I thought maybe it was an act, but apparently not.
I thought maybe it was an act, but apparently not.
Posted on 12/5/17 at 1:00 am to 3down10
You obviously don’t know or listen to Kanell. I have this year and I actually agree with him more often than not. If you don’t realize that ESPN is a division of the university of Alabama you are not paying attention, but that is not what he said at all.
He said he doesn’t have problem with Bama getting in except they say the value conference champs,etc. but with the eyeball test and “best” team mandate etc really can do whatever they want so why do we even try to figure it out since it will change from person to person to year to year. And he is correct.
What he advocates and I have also since day 1 is 8 team playoff. 5 conference champs best of group of five as 6 seed and Two wildcards as 7 and 8 seeds. You get a bonus in seeding if you win your conference and eyeball test goes to two teams. What the hell is wrong with this?
We are loving this because we are always getting it. Let us get left out a few years and we hate it too.
He doesn’t hate SEC, he does think Bama gets way too much deference on everything so maybe he hates Bama. Hence, he is my new best friend lol
He said he doesn’t have problem with Bama getting in except they say the value conference champs,etc. but with the eyeball test and “best” team mandate etc really can do whatever they want so why do we even try to figure it out since it will change from person to person to year to year. And he is correct.
What he advocates and I have also since day 1 is 8 team playoff. 5 conference champs best of group of five as 6 seed and Two wildcards as 7 and 8 seeds. You get a bonus in seeding if you win your conference and eyeball test goes to two teams. What the hell is wrong with this?
We are loving this because we are always getting it. Let us get left out a few years and we hate it too.
He doesn’t hate SEC, he does think Bama gets way too much deference on everything so maybe he hates Bama. Hence, he is my new best friend lol
This post was edited on 12/5/17 at 1:08 am
Posted on 12/5/17 at 1:02 am to AshLSU
quote:
Auburn lost to Georgia in the SECCG because of injuries. Injuries that would have been healed by playoffs. Auburn would have stood a good chance of winning the NC if they were in it and fully healed.
You think Alabama was at full strength when they played Auburn? Alabama has played with major injuries to the LB corp for 11/12 of the schedule.
If Alabama did not have injuries, then this entire conversation about whether Alabama deserves to be in or not is moot. Alabama is unbeaten, #1, and SEC Champs....
Posted on 12/5/17 at 4:24 am to TutHillTiger
No, we've all been listening to Kanell's anti-Bama/SEC bullshite for years that's why Rusillo was right to call him out on it.
Last year, the conspiracy between ESPN & the committee was to get tOSU in. Now,magically, it's switched to ESPN/the committee working to get Bama in & tOSU out.
The most likely scenario is that the committee, just like they said, thought the horrible loss to Iowa disqualified the Buckeyes.
Last year, the conspiracy between ESPN & the committee was to get tOSU in. Now,magically, it's switched to ESPN/the committee working to get Bama in & tOSU out.
The most likely scenario is that the committee, just like they said, thought the horrible loss to Iowa disqualified the Buckeyes.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News