Started By
Message

re: All-time SEC Standings

Posted on 1/20/16 at 5:06 pm to
Posted by SquirrelyBama
Member since Nov 2011
6389 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 5:06 pm to
Interesting stats OP
Thanks

Posted by Old Money
Member since Sep 2012
36321 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

We've already PROVEN that LSU has played by far the easiest SEC schedule of the Big 6 teams. There is no disputing that.


I dont understand why this matter to you? Not the easiest, but the least ammount of other Big 6 schools. Let me help you spell this out:
Geography
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
y
This post was edited on 1/20/16 at 5:44 pm
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29650 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 6:49 pm to
(no message)
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29650 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 6:56 pm to
The term Big 6 was 1st used for the 1st 6 teams to win an SEC title

MS State was an original member...
This post was edited on 1/20/16 at 6:57 pm
Posted by boxedlunch
Member since May 2012
484 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:18 am to
quote:


Maybe he realized that he had weakened his earlier argument that Georgia was courageous for playing Auburn and Florida in the SEC's early years while LSU must have been dodging them by playing Ole Miss and Tulane instead.

The fact of the matter is that Ole Miss and Tulane had 9 SEC titles combined during that era while AU and UF had just 1 SEC title combined (up until the 1980s)--and by today's standards would actually have had 0 titles since SEC teams on NCAA probation can no longer compete for the conference crown.

Could Georgia have actually been the school during that era that dodged the stronger teams of the conference in order to play the weaker teams? I'm just sayin'...


From what I've seen, it's more likely he just doesn't know what he's talking about.

From 33 to 65, LSU's conference opponents had a .534 conference winning percentage, second highest of any SEC team. Georgia's had a .485.

You should always just teams by how good each one was, not their historical measure. When Michigan went 3-9, teams were playing a 3-9 team, not the winningest team in history. Measuring "Big 6" opponents is asinine, if you're looking for an SOS measure.
Posted by hoojy
In the fridge with my hot sauce.
Member since Nov 2013
8553 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:27 am to
Awesome. We're 15th out of 14.
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 11:28 am
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32813 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 12:04 pm to
No way would tech be part of a big 7. Their winning % would have been destroyed over the past 50 years.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter