Started By
Message
ALL-TIME bowl records for SEC teams
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:28 pm
Doesn't include bowls for this year in the total count.
By total:
Alabama: 60 (34-23-3) .567
Tennessee: 49 (25-24) .510
Georgia: 48 (27-18-3) .562
LSU: 45 (23-21-1) .511
Florida: 40 (20-20) .500
Arkansas: 39 (13-23-3) .333
Auburn: 38 (22-14-2) .579
Ole Miss: 35 (23-12) .657
Texas A&M: 35 (16-19) .457
Missouri: 30 (14-16) .467
South Carolina: 19 (7-12) .368
Mississippi State: 18 (11-7) .611
Kentucky: 14 (8-6) .571
Vanderbilt: 7 (4-2-1) .571
By winning %
Ole Miss: 35 (23-12) .657
Mississippi State: 18 (11-7) .611
Auburn: 38 (22-14-2) .579
Kentucky: 14 (8-6) .571
Vanderbilt: 7 (4-2-1) .571
Alabama: 60 (34-23-3) .567
Georgia: 48 (27-18-3) .562
LSU: 45 (23-21-1) .511
Tennessee: 49 (25-24) .510
Florida: 40 (20-20) .500
Missouri: 30 (14-16) .467
Texas A&M: 35 (16-19) .457
South Carolina: 19 (7-12) .368
Arkansas: 39 (13-23-3) .333
By total:
Alabama: 60 (34-23-3) .567
Tennessee: 49 (25-24) .510
Georgia: 48 (27-18-3) .562
LSU: 45 (23-21-1) .511
Florida: 40 (20-20) .500
Arkansas: 39 (13-23-3) .333
Auburn: 38 (22-14-2) .579
Ole Miss: 35 (23-12) .657
Texas A&M: 35 (16-19) .457
Missouri: 30 (14-16) .467
South Carolina: 19 (7-12) .368
Mississippi State: 18 (11-7) .611
Kentucky: 14 (8-6) .571
Vanderbilt: 7 (4-2-1) .571
By winning %
Ole Miss: 35 (23-12) .657
Mississippi State: 18 (11-7) .611
Auburn: 38 (22-14-2) .579
Kentucky: 14 (8-6) .571
Vanderbilt: 7 (4-2-1) .571
Alabama: 60 (34-23-3) .567
Georgia: 48 (27-18-3) .562
LSU: 45 (23-21-1) .511
Tennessee: 49 (25-24) .510
Florida: 40 (20-20) .500
Missouri: 30 (14-16) .467
Texas A&M: 35 (16-19) .457
South Carolina: 19 (7-12) .368
Arkansas: 39 (13-23-3) .333
This post was edited on 12/10/14 at 10:40 pm
12
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:28 pm to KCM0Tiger
: REC :
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:28 pm to KCM0Tiger
Sort by % please
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:28 pm to KCM0Tiger
Boom.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:30 pm to KCM0Tiger
Also. Most of these teams lost nearly half their bowls. Suggesting that they were overrated. Feels good to be a Rebel
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:31 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
.333
Not bad if it were a batting average
I know - not good.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:31 pm to KCM0Tiger
Again.....Arky has the lowest percentage.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:38 pm to KCM0Tiger
Everyone would have .500 record or better if it were not for the Big 12 teams and S. Carolina.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:40 pm to SabanIsAGod
The win percentage ranking is weird...the two Mississippi schools are the best and the bottom four are all expansion teams.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:40 pm to KCM0Tiger
Ole Miss- .657
Miss St- .611
Auburn- .579
Kentucky- .571
Vandy- .571
Alabama- .567
Georgia- .562
LSU- .511
Tennessee- .510
Florida- .500
Mizzou- .467
Texas A&M- .457
South Carolina- .368
Arkansas- .333
Find it funny that the newest 4 members if the conference represent the bottom 4 in winning percentage.
Eta- dammit. That's what I get for trying to do it on an iPad. Oh well
Miss St- .611
Auburn- .579
Kentucky- .571
Vandy- .571
Alabama- .567
Georgia- .562
LSU- .511
Tennessee- .510
Florida- .500
Mizzou- .467
Texas A&M- .457
South Carolina- .368
Arkansas- .333
Find it funny that the newest 4 members if the conference represent the bottom 4 in winning percentage.
Eta- dammit. That's what I get for trying to do it on an iPad. Oh well
This post was edited on 12/10/14 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:45 pm to auzach91
quote:
Find it funny that the newest 4 members if the conference represent the bottom 4 in winning percentage.
I think 3 of our bowl losses were to current SEC teams, so it'd look a lot better if you deduced that.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:48 pm to theGarnetWay
Ironically a majority of our bowl wins were probably against SEC teams
We prefer losing to the MAC, Big East, Indiana, etc....
We prefer losing to the MAC, Big East, Indiana, etc....
Posted on 12/10/14 at 11:08 pm to KCM0Tiger
5 of our 7 come against the Big 10.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 11:17 pm to KTownRebel
quote:
Also. Most of these teams lost nearly half their bowls. Suggesting that they were overrated. Feels good to be a Rebel
Wrong, bowl games are supposed to produce relatively equal matchups. As such everyone's bowl win % SHOULD be ~.500 (which is why almost everyone is about at that number).
If you're higher than that means your team ends up in worse bowls than it deserves. Lower than that means your teams ends up in better bowls than it deserves.
This post was edited on 12/10/14 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 12/10/14 at 11:20 pm to KCM0Tiger
The win %'s aren't correct for teams that have ties. Tie's are supposed to count as half a win for win %. It sound stupid but that's how it's done.
Thus 34-23-3 is actually 35.5 / 60 = .591
(and your number leaves out Alabama's vacated Cotton Bowl win, but whatever that only changes the % a little (.598 vs .591)
Thus 34-23-3 is actually 35.5 / 60 = .591
(and your number leaves out Alabama's vacated Cotton Bowl win, but whatever that only changes the % a little (.598 vs .591)
This post was edited on 12/10/14 at 11:21 pm
Posted on 12/10/14 at 11:25 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Ole Miss: 35 (23-12) .657
Mississippi State: 18 (11-7) .611
Auburn: 38 (22-14-2) .579
Kentucky: 14 (8-6) .571
Vanderbilt: 7 (4-2-1) .571
Alabama: 60 (34-23-3) .567
Georgia: 48 (27-18-3) .562
LSU: 45 (23-21-1) .511
Tennessee: 49 (25-24) .510
Florida: 40 (20-20) .500
Missouri: 30 (14-16) .467
Texas A&M: 35 (16-19) .457
South Carolina: 19 (7-12) .368
Arkansas: 39 (13-23-3) .333
Vanderbilt's winning percentage is .643
Mississippi State is 10-7
Auburn's winning percentage is .605
Kentucky is 8-7
Alabama's winning percentage is .592
Georgia is 27-19-3
LSU's winning percentage is .522
Arkansas's winning percentage is .371
Posted on 12/10/14 at 11:39 pm to KCM0Tiger
Is there anything to learn from this data?
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:19 am to TheIndulger
Tennessee has been in a strange situation for a long time when it comes to bowl games. We go bowling often (last few years excluded) but we've also tended to be paired with teams we had no business playing because we travel so well among other reasons. Back then, but even today pairing teams close in rank didn't matter (today you can see that outside of BCS/playoff games).
The worst though had to be getting slaughtered by Nebraska. Yes, Peyton was injured and yes
Nebraska was an all time good team that year but they dominated to the point of being humiliating when it happened.
Looking at other teams that bowl a lot, it appears many have the same or similar issues.
The worst though had to be getting slaughtered by Nebraska. Yes, Peyton was injured and yes
Nebraska was an all time good team that year but they dominated to the point of being humiliating when it happened.
Looking at other teams that bowl a lot, it appears many have the same or similar issues.
This post was edited on 12/11/14 at 12:21 am
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:27 am to Prof
What he said
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:32 am to TheIndulger
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 12:49 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News