Started By
Message
re: A picture of Sategna and the ref has been found.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:12 am to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:12 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
This really isn't the good argument you think you are making, it actually proves the opposite of what you want it to prove.
It proves none of you vaginas were the least bit upset about it when Ole Miss did it two years ago, nor was the SEC officiating office.
I was here in 2023 and there was no discussion at all about it. Why the faux outrage now?
You're about as consistent with your outrage as your officiating crews are with their rules enforcement.
This post was edited on 9/22/25 at 11:14 am
4
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:19 am to CharlotteSooner
This is still your best melt.
quote:
The SEC officials said it was legal BEFORE THE GAME, DURING THE GAME WHEN WE RAN IT, AND DIRECTLY TO THE BROADCAST TEAM ON LIVE TELEVISION YOU IGNORANT DIPSHIT.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:20 am to CharlotteSooner
You’re almost to the acceptance phase. Keep trucking, partner
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:23 am to TulsaSooner78
If you don’t understand that it took a middle school bullshite bush league play to beat auburn then I don’t know what to tell you. You and your coach can suck my dick forever. frick you skeletor. Cheating arse pussy. See you in a few weeks.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:23 am to Hback
I don't have anything to melt about. I am responding to a widespread "melt" by all of you. We're over here laughing at you, not melting. 
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:26 am to CharlotteSooner
What it proves that Allbarn fans are whiny cunts and just like the Orange Little Brothers we escaped.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:30 am to Mizz-SEC
There goes Misery again…flappin’ line a Walrus!
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:44 am to Hook Em Horns
Won’t need anything to boatrace your sorry offense
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:48 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
It proves none of you vaginas were the least bit upset about it when Ole Miss did it two years ago, nor was the SEC officiating office.
I was here in 2023 and there was no discussion at all about it.
They ammended the rule because of it
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:53 am to TulsaSooner78
Here you go. LINK
Posted on 9/22/25 at 11:54 am to CharlotteSooner
The problem is the rule is ambiguous and requires the refs to make judgement calls.
The rule states
Here is what a hideout tactic is:
I can find no where in the rules that quantifies what “near the sideline” is. There is not a distance from the sideline that is specified. In this case, the player was inside the hashmarks. So was he near the sideline or not? That is a judgment call. Also, no where can I find where it specifies whether a player has to walk, jog or run off the field. Neither does it specify whether a player moving into position has to walk, jog or run. So again it is a judgment call whether he was trying to appear to leave the field or just going to get in position.
If someone has the rule which specifies the actual distance that ‘near the sidelines’ is, please post it.
The rule states
quote:
College: 9-2-2
SECTION 2. Unsportsmanlike Conduct Fouls
Unfair Tactics
ARTICLE 2. a. No player shall conceal the ball in or beneath their clothing or equipment or substitute any other article for the ball. b. No simulated replacements or substitutions may be used to confuse opponents. No tactic associated with substitutes or the substitution process may be used to confuse opponents (Rule 3-5-2e). This includes any hideout tactic with or without substitution.
Here is what a hideout tactic is:
quote:
Hideout Tactics: Hiding a player near the sideline to receive a pass is a hideout tactic and is illegal
I can find no where in the rules that quantifies what “near the sideline” is. There is not a distance from the sideline that is specified. In this case, the player was inside the hashmarks. So was he near the sideline or not? That is a judgment call. Also, no where can I find where it specifies whether a player has to walk, jog or run off the field. Neither does it specify whether a player moving into position has to walk, jog or run. So again it is a judgment call whether he was trying to appear to leave the field or just going to get in position.
If someone has the rule which specifies the actual distance that ‘near the sidelines’ is, please post it.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:03 pm to ant111
From your link, the SEC stated:
So again, the rule is not clearly defined and is subject to interpretation. The SEC said so.
quote:
The conference continued its statement, saying the officiating crew did not properly interpret the action as a hideout tactic
So again, the rule is not clearly defined and is subject to interpretation. The SEC said so.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:59 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
seems like when the NCAA had to rewrite the rulebook for the numerous recruiting loopholes that Saban exploited over the years, your reaction was less contrite and more along the lines of ‘lol, you losers should have taken advantage yourselves, you got schooled by the GOAT’
I never said AU didn't have the right to bend the rules or exploit loopholes. Just don't whine when it happens to you as well.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:16 pm to Csmims
quote:
By rule it should’ve been a 15 yard unsportsmanlike conduct penalty against Oklahoma
It was second down. We inquired about the play (because it is full of interpretation) before the game.
In no reasonable scenario would we get a penalty. If they said their interpretation was that it would be against the rules, then we would not have run it. Second down.
If they had told us it was legal and called a 15 yard penalty that would itself have been complete trash.
All that said, Auburn should have been given a timeout.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:18 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
I'm sure you can point me to your outrage when Ole Miss did it to your own team lil aggie. I'm waiting.....
You keep deflecting instead of looking squarely at the low character of your staff and yourself as you continually make excuses for them.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:35 pm to TulsaSooner78
unless you're a complete idiot (and you ARE from Oklahoma) you know that the stance of the receiver at the exact moment the ball is snapped is almost irrelevant.
It's the feigning of a substitution- which if course you'd need video- not photograph.
even the league office got THAT right (a day late)
It's the feigning of a substitution- which if course you'd need video- not photograph.
even the league office got THAT right (a day late)
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:58 pm to truth22
quote:
It's the feigning of a substitution
By rule, what quantifiably determines whether a player is ‘feigning of a substitution’ or just moving into position?
Posted on 9/22/25 at 2:11 pm to captdalton
quote:
By rule, what quantifiably determines whether a player is ‘feigning of a substitution’ or just moving into position?
it's one of those "you know it when you see it" and the entire football watching wirld (including even the cluless SEC ) saw it,
except for OU fans of course.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 2:19 pm to Pariah_
quote:
The announcers tried their hardest to whip Auburn fans into a frenzy, and it worked. They sounded more biased than the local university radio broadcasters.
I don't think you've ever listened to AU radio.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News