Started By
Message
re: 4 Alabama football players arrested for robbery ... Link with victims story
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:51 am to bamafan425
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:51 am to bamafan425
quote:
Are we just assuming that none of these guys parents could afford bond?
If the bond was high then it seems unlikely all 4 made it that fast.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:51 am to bamafan425
quote:60k for 2 65k for one and 5k for honey bear
What was their bond?
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:52 am to WDE24
If a booster would really post bond for these guys, he needs his head examined. Just saying.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:52 am to Alahunter
quote:
Personal accountability is almost nil in society, because people know they will get a slap on the wrist in most cases.
I agree to a certain extent but in this case as the Felony , I cant believe anyone involved thought they would ever play another down of college football. We are not talking about stealing something out of someones locker or cheating on a test. Violent crimes and the people who commit them are very different situations
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:52 am to NYCAuburn
I was asking about the Auburn players from last year.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:52 am to NYCAuburn
How much of a bond has to be paid to get released?
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:52 am to NYCAuburn
That is 19k to a bond company. Assuming that is the route they went.
quote:If using a bail bondsman, you pay them 10% and they post your bail.
How much of a bond has to be paid to get released?
This post was edited on 2/12/13 at 10:54 am
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:52 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
k for 2 65k for one and 5k for honey bear
10%..
Can see how honeybear got out quick. Not so much the other three.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:53 am to Bham4Tide
quote:
How much of a bond has to be paid to get released?
10-15% sometimes more, but 10% is the norm
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:53 am to LanierSpots
They probably thought nobody would ever turn them in. Stupidity goes a long ways in self delusion. 
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:54 am to NYCAuburn
The NCAA only delivers significant penalties when the member schools fail to demonstrate that they have taken measures to prevent this from happening in the future and do not self-impose appropriate penalties for violations in which penalties are warranted.
This is kind of like a corporation's harassment policies - if they have an anti-harrasment training program in place and have made it clear to their employees that such activity isn't tolerated, then follow through with appropriate disciplinary/corrective action when someone commits the offense, then the corporation is not liable for individual's actions, unless that individual is a supervisor engaged in quid-pro-quo harassment (at which point the company could still be liable, but the proof of attempted measures to control, prevent, or curtail the behavior mitigate culpability).
I know for a fact that UA has given appropriate training to student athletes in this regard, so as long as they are disciplined according to university policy and within NCAA guidelines, there's no real issue here for the program itself.
This is kind of like a corporation's harassment policies - if they have an anti-harrasment training program in place and have made it clear to their employees that such activity isn't tolerated, then follow through with appropriate disciplinary/corrective action when someone commits the offense, then the corporation is not liable for individual's actions, unless that individual is a supervisor engaged in quid-pro-quo harassment (at which point the company could still be liable, but the proof of attempted measures to control, prevent, or curtail the behavior mitigate culpability).
I know for a fact that UA has given appropriate training to student athletes in this regard, so as long as they are disciplined according to university policy and within NCAA guidelines, there's no real issue here for the program itself.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:54 am to bamafan425
quote:
I was asking about the Auburn players from last year.
It was a frickton. A lot more than the bama players. Lot more. I think I remember D Mosely's parents being able to put their house up for collateral and he was the only one that made bond.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:55 am to bamafan425
quote:
I was asking about the Auburn players from last year.
a lot, they all stayed in jail for a while sans mosely
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:56 am to NYCAuburn
That's what I figured.
19k between them all is a shite ton, but I guess it's more manageable than armed robbery.
19k between them all is a shite ton, but I guess it's more manageable than armed robbery.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:56 am to NYCAuburn
So is there a link in here detailing what they did?
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:57 am to NYCAuburn
AU players total bond was $511,000, so about $127,750 each, meaning $12-$19k each would have had to come up with.
Mosely was the only one that was able to come up with it.
Read more: Anniston Star - Four AU players arrested dismissed
Mosely was the only one that was able to come up with it.
quote:
Their bonds were set at $511,000. According to t a report from the Auburn-Opelika News after appearing before a judge Friday afternoon, Mosley had posted bond. Goodwin, Kitchens and McNeil remain in custody.
Read more: Anniston Star - Four AU players arrested dismissed
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:57 am to crimsonsaint
dunno. I looked on the Bama board and looks like hitting some people in the head, taking their stuff and buying Cheetoh's with an ACT card.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:58 am to LaBornNRaised
Stealing to get snacks, they're definitely not getting paid. You can bet drugs were involved, something a little stronger than deer antler spray.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:58 am to HarryBalzack
quote:
HarryBalzack
kicking them off of the team after an NCAA violation occurs, does not really releave them of NCAA penalties. this is about boosters providing impermissable benefits to athletes, not the crime itself
This is all in theory as well, as we are speculating on bond payment
Back to top


0









