Favorite team:UAB 
Location:In a Van down by the River
Biography:Idunno
Interests:Travel / Family
Occupation:Counselor
Number of Posts:23359
Registered on:2/21/2011
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Epstein Derangement Syndrome (EDS)

Posted by Bham4Tide on 7/16/25 at 10:25 am
Please leave. This is just spam. You do this ALL DAY LONG.

We know the game.

re: Epstein Derangement Syndrome (EDS)

Posted by Bham4Tide on 7/16/25 at 10:08 am
It’s pretty much just the same posters replying to their own posts with different names - and downvoting anything related to EDS. I’m sure new ones are here as well - drawing clicks.

It’s the same ole tactic used for years.

Epstein Derangement Syndrome (EDS)

Posted by Bham4Tide on 7/16/25 at 8:47 am
I’m calling this non-stop online retch, Epstein Derangement Syndrome (EDS). This board had like 8 threads on the first page yesterday - all regurgitating the same BS.

It’s just as imbecilic as TDS at this point.
quote:

You shouldn’t be punished if you want to buy a car or a house because you got cancer and it’s taking you awhile to pay the bills.


I agree. Just read a story about a kid with cancer having to go to Europe for some care not approved here. You know medical bills, travel expenses will soar for those parents.


I’m with him. I don’t give a shite about the Epstein crap. I care more about the election issues.
The good: Mr. Terrific was cool. Lois was great. Lex was fantastic. Superman was very good - just not the brightest bulb/sharpest knife. Green Lantern and Hawkgirl were fine.

The bad: Jimmy was annoying and not the character I know. The Kents were just bad - waaaay too redneck - I mean they called each other “Ma” and “Pa” and Ma seemed to have a southern accent at times (no Kansas there). I have no idea who Steve at the Daily Planet was - a very unneeded character who added absolutely nothing to the film.

The screenplay was just off - too many characters, not enough development on some rushed scenes, rushed plot lines (like Superman going from hero to goat in like 30 seconds and then from goat to hero in like 1 minute). That whole Lex wanting to be a king thing was stupid. The Black Hole - c’mon.

They also seemed to just throw things together to show a good visual shot.

Overall - 65% rating (barely fresh)
Stuart and the minor characters in a regular spin-off? May not work.

Stuart and the minor characters in a twisted multiverse, laden with special effects and f-bombs? May be a lot of fun.
quote:

all that shite was rage baiting from the media


This I believe 100%.

I think they absolutely want very little politics in anything they create. Seems pretty clear.
CNN will cover it now due to Tapper.

This story possibly has the potential (I’ll emphasize “potential”) to effectively crush the Democrats heading into midterms.
You left off “Two Guys and a Girl” (was on the final 3 seasons)
Wow. College baseball is about on par with women’s softball.

Congrats!

re: James Bond has its director

Posted by Bham4Tide on 6/26/25 at 6:13 am
Sounds like he is a huge fan, and will try to keep it traditional Bond.

I’m game if he does that.

This site is unreadable

Posted by Bham4Tide on 6/23/25 at 6:06 pm
The left has wanted to increase their social media presence - well, they’ve done it x1000.

I’m done until Chicken takes care of this.
You can read the same posts, threads, etc. on Axios or any left-leaning site almost word-for-word.

This site is really close to being unreadable.
1. Go into talks, let them pump up enrichment, become modern, while hoping they don’t make a WMD. Why not give them billions so they can hire the right people to make that happen?

2. Stay out of it altogether and hope that #1 happens on its on - and all that “Death to America” is just fun and games.

3. Go the Warhawk route and give them “shock & awe” - tens of thousands of deaths are nothing compared to a nice, shiny base sitting in Tehran.

4. Keep up intel and bomb their nuclear facilities every decade or so - until they find smarter ways around it (like moving it to populated areas)

5. Give allies our advanced tech and weapons to do this themselves.

Where is the win?
Why do YOU care about the BBC?

You a globalist?
Obviously a very public, and carefully-worded, statement. They don’t want to give any indication they want in this mission - unless it all falls apart for Iran. They will then want pieces of the pie.

quote:

Letting Isreal gain air superiority then dropping some bombs from a stealth bomber is hardly "breathtaking."

This is simple shite. also, we have no idea how much damage we actually caused.


Simple? Not even sure how to respond to that other than to just shake my head. The left-leaning commentators here read like and sound like (when read aloud) an Axios and/or any majority left-leaning site. Interesting.