re: JFK

The fact that he missed on his first shot always made me question the single shooter theory too, but then I saw a documentary that talks about a hole in the traffic signal that you can see in the FBI’s re-enactment footage. They contended that the first shot hit the traffic signal (it would’ve been between Oswald and the limo), deflected, and hit Tague

quote:

---

GWM

---

correct me if i'm wrong, but military weapons qualification is at stationary targets, nothing moving, right?

at least, the nine years i was in, we never qualified on anything other than a stationary target

Let us take this at the top.

Oswald fired from about 81 yards away at a target moving, in a set course, forward at the speed of about 5 miles an hour. If you think a trained marksman can't hit that target than I have no idea what to tell you other than I am certain that 90% of people on this forum with firearms experience could make that shot and the other 10% would miss because they were drunk.

There is, in fact, photograph evidence of the wound to the back of JFK's skull. I shan't link to the picture, which you can find online, because the autopsy tech has reached inside Kennedy's skull to hold the head up. Regardless, I suggest using Bing because they display pictures better than Google. It should be one of the first few dozens images up there.

The wound to the back of the head is small. Shockingly small to most folks. Also take note of the x-rays showing a small wound to the back of the skull and the resulting fragmentation of the skull down the bullet's path.

Moving forward... quite literally in this case... the autopsy photos show the catastrophic failure that JFK's skull suffered from shot. You will note, and again I will not link to those photos, y'all can find them and I again suggest Bing because it is better at lining up pictures, a clear exit groove downstream of the massive head trauma a few inches above JFK's right eye.

So. Why do we assume the damage was primarily to the back of the skull even at first glance with many of the photos? Many of the photos are with JFK laying face up and taken from above. So the skull eruption seems to be going to the back.

What actually happened is the bullet entered the back of his skull, and I do mean the back, its a marvelously centered shot, penetrated inside the cranium, and then caused a hydrostatic explosion that, due to the angle, quite literally blew the top of his head off.

A large piece of bone went straight up and detached from the skull. Two smaller, but significant, sized chunks of bone were blown outwards and forwards before detaching. Additionally, as many of the photos show, a fourth piece of the skull was ejected outwards and forward but is still attached by skin. Its just kind of hanging out there saying howdy.

There is more. We also have photos of the first wound JFK suffered, a shot to his back, with a small entrance wound, that exited in a more gory fashion to the front of his neck looking like it might have clipped the very bottom of his Adam's apple.

Again. I get it. No one wants to admit some no account peckerwood like Lee Harvey Oswald whacked the most powerful person in the world. It had to be the CIA. Or the KGB. Possibly both working in conjunction with those Reptillians the QAnon folks like talking about.

The truth is it isn't that difficult to whack anyone, even a President. And people really like to try. Trump had two assassination attempts on his life that were foiled before they got close. Obama had 7. Every US President since Richard Nixon has had at least one serious threat made on their life.

4 Presidents have been whacked. 2 were wounded... with Teddy Roosevelt demonstrating his monstrous sized balls by going on to give a 90 minute long speech before finally consenting to go to the hospital. Considering RFK was very likely to win we can add him to the pool.

The one thing I can say about JFK's assassination attempt that doesn't get covered often enough... he was unlucky. The Carcano Model 38 that was used, an accurate rifle, has a tendency to jam if you try to fire it too rapidly. Basically a coin flip if you try to fire it as fast as Oswald did.

If it had jammed after the first two shots (Oswald missed the first one and may have clipped a sign post)then JFK might have survived the shot to his neck. It didn't.

I know this will not convince any of you who truly believe this story. I'm just putting this out there for those on the fence. The truth is the JFK assassination is a cottage industry by this point. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a new "historian" trying to pitch his own particular version of the events. This is going to hang around like the moon landing "hoax" theories.

Oswald was the lone gunman. There’s not really any serious debate over that at this point. Was anyone else involved in planning the assassination? I guess we can’t know for sure but I doubt it.

quote:

---

No proof of another shooter, Oswald was the lone shooter.

---

The House Assignations Committee says .....WRONG!

When examining tapes and audio footage during the shooting, it was determined that Four shots were fired. Not three.

If Oswald fired a rifle at noon and then fired a handgun within an hour at Tippet .....He would have gunpowder all over him. His hands tested positive .....his cheeks negative.

One palm print. Found on the underside of the barrel, beneath the wood stock of a rifle that had to be corrected to shooting capability at the FBI lab ...Far too many holes for this to be open and shut.

There is much evidence the Bilderberg Group did it.



along with any leader that is against the global banking conglomerant.

quote:

---

Oswald was lone shooter but absolutely was backed/activated by Kennedy's Mafia rivals.

---

You have to keep in mind that supposedly Oswald shot two people that day using two different guns. He should have had gun powder residue all over him. Yet the paraffin tests showed a substance on his hands, but not on his checks. The report said that the test was inconclusive because he handled boxes all day and would have substances on his hands that would have skewed the test results.

I believe that too many hands were in the cookie jar and the Warren Report had a predetermined outcome regardless of the evidence. Exactly what came out. Still have my original copy of the Warren Report that has been read multiple times.