Started By
Message
re: If the Muslims want holy war then let's give it to them.
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:35 am to antibarner
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:35 am to antibarner
quote:
Right after 9-11 no one would have dared say a word..we could have used any method of retaliation. Our homeland had been directly attacked, the American people would have cheered such a move and the rest of the world would have kept their mouths shut fearing they could be next.
Simply using a technologically superior weapon system would have got him dead but it would not have sent the same message as how it eventually worked out.
As it happened, it was demonstrated that
1) The United States will never stop looking for you
2) National borders are meaningless. If we find you, we will kill you
3) If need be, we will meet you man to man and kill you up close and personal.
I am no fan of Obama at all, but he has my complete respect for approving that mission. It took real courage to make that call.
This post was edited on 5/21/15 at 9:37 am
2
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:36 am to antibarner
How you gonna take out the Rothschilds???
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:38 am to CarolinaCock
If it was them behind it, with Special Ops. No exceptions. Open season, if you were in on it you're dead.
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:39 am to JustGetItRight
quote:
it was demonstrated that
1) The United States will never stop looking for you
2) National borders are meaningless. If we find you, we will kill you
3) If need be, we will meet you man to man and kill you up close and personal.
I am no fan of Obama at all, but he has my complete respect for approving that mission. It took real courage to make that call.
Agreed on all counts
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:41 am to JustGetItRight
Only a partial tactical victory. My scenario stops all of this garbage in its tracks. We might have been at war with a few more players, but I am betting not. Some people would have been turned over to us or taken out by their own to avoid it, either that or glow in the dark.
ISIS and all these other outfits cannot exist without backers. It takes money to get in the game and if everyone was scared spitless to ante up, there is no game.
ISIS and all these other outfits cannot exist without backers. It takes money to get in the game and if everyone was scared spitless to ante up, there is no game.
This post was edited on 5/21/15 at 9:44 am
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:41 am to antibarner
Oh they have a hand in anything that's going to make money. They've funded both sides of every major war in the last 100yrs
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:44 am to CarolinaCock
Then present the evidence and wipe the bastards out. Zero tolerance. We need to start killing the right ones and the message will get through.
This post was edited on 5/21/15 at 9:47 am
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:53 am to antibarner
quote:Finally, some intelligence coming out of this thread.
How you gonna take out the Rothschilds???
If it was them behind it, with Special Ops. No exceptions. Open season, if you were in on it you're dead.
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:55 am to antibarner
American masses would have cheered but the masses are generally fricking stupid and were very emotional, not a good time to make huge decisions.
The international community would have said something, and rightfully so. You don't drop nukes like that in this day and age. It is not good for anybody.
The international community would have said something, and rightfully so. You don't drop nukes like that in this day and age. It is not good for anybody.
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:56 am to TX Tiger
We can bomb ragheads forever, and more of them will pop up. Kill the backers and they can just get as all pissed off over there as they please, but without money , arms and the means to attack overseas they can pound sand.
Posted on 5/21/15 at 9:58 am to CheeseburgerEddie
Blowing up the Twin Towers is something you do not do in this day and age also. Hitting the Pentagon and targeting the White House? This was total war against us. I suppose that was good for someone but I don't give a damn about them. We would have been justified in any response we chose and no one would have done a thing about it.
At that point you are with us or against us. And after such a response I don't think many would have the balls to be against us.
At that point you are with us or against us. And after such a response I don't think many would have the balls to be against us.
This post was edited on 5/21/15 at 10:05 am
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:01 am to antibarner
quote:IN
Kill the backers
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:01 am to TX Tiger
If we are serious about ending this that is the way to go. Being our friend in public and supporting these assclowns in private cannot be tolerated.
This post was edited on 5/21/15 at 10:03 am
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:03 am to antibarner
Actually a lot of shite gets blown up in the world, including buildings. Nukes have been dropped twice in the history of the world.
We would not have been justified at all on dropping a nuke. I don't know who would have said it done anything but it would have been a huge black eye to this nation and our history.
We would not have been justified at all on dropping a nuke. I don't know who would have said it done anything but it would have been a huge black eye to this nation and our history.
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:04 am to antibarner
No they probably wouldn't have gone against is, but that doesn't it make it right in my mind
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:04 am to antibarner
quote:
We would have been justified in any response we chose
So nuking the entire middle east and killing 100s of millions of innocent people is justifiable?
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:08 am to Duke
I suppose hitting the Towers and Pentagon and targeting the White House in a decapitation strike deserves a nasty editorial in the media. No different than a nuke in my book.
I said nuke Tora Bora and the camps in Afghanistan. Then let it be known that the gloves are off and if you support these assclowns be you a nation or an individual we are coming for you. The message would have been loud, clear and received.
I seriously doubt we at that point would have to raise another finger.
I said nuke Tora Bora and the camps in Afghanistan. Then let it be known that the gloves are off and if you support these assclowns be you a nation or an individual we are coming for you. The message would have been loud, clear and received.
I seriously doubt we at that point would have to raise another finger.
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:11 am to antibarner
quote:Lemme see if I have this right....
Blowing up the Twin Towers is something you do not do in this day and age also. Hitting the Pentagon and targeting the White House? This was total war against us. I suppose that was good for someone but I don't give a damn about them. We would have been justified in any response we chose and no one would have done a thing about it.
At that point you are with us or against us. And after such a response I don't think many would have the balls to be against us.
If my objective was to enter a region and use the military to "clear some land" and reap trillions of dollars in the process while ousting a few of its leaders who refuse to "go along with the program," it would be to my benefit to have some catastrophic catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor - because nobody would question the response.
Do I have it right?
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:11 am to antibarner
You said any response would be justified. So I took it to the extreme.
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:11 am to antibarner
Well in my mind you are a little crazy thinking a nuke is the same thing
Page 7 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News