Started By
Message
South Carolina Post-muschamp
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:32 pm
My thinking is that SC should win 1 to 3 more games just by not having him on the sidelines this season. I've read things here and there that make me believe there was a level of toxicity to team chemistry he brought to the table. His defenses at Carolina never hit on shite and we all know about his offenses. Is he just that bad as a head coach?
8
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:35 pm to Digger
So do you think that Carolina wins more than 1 or 2 SEC games this season?
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:47 pm to Jebadeb
Probably 2. 3 if luck is on our side. Honestly there are so many new faces, both players and staff, that i dont have a clue. We could potentially be really good or just as easily struggle badly. I think 5 overall wins with a possible 6th would be a good start.
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:48 pm to Digger
I think it more likely comes down to Clemson steadily taking every SC recruit they want, and UGA taking what they can as well. USC can no longer rely on in-state recruiting like they used to. USC now needs to recruit nationally, and that's a tough sell with the higher caliber athletes because of the hole you are in now. I almost feel sorry for you guys. But the way you acted when you had a taste of success with SOS, you deserve some of this wretched existence you find yourselves squalloring in today.
Beamer. LOL.
Beamer. LOL.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:51 pm to deeprig9
I freaking love what Beamer is about. Clemson recruits mostly nationally so SC gets its share of good SC kids. Also we are recruiting on a more national scale now. The northeast in particular.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 12:53 pm to deeprig9
Muschamp is going to bring his loser stink to UGA with him. Wait and see.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 1:21 pm to Jebadeb
Vandy and . . .
Posted on 8/11/21 at 1:51 pm to Digger
SCAR allowing their former players to pick the new Head Coach should tell you all that you need to know about their trajectory.
Along with this winning quote- "not one offense we play will figure this defense out"
Further proof that their fat old baseball coach is still just as lost as an Athletic Director as he was the day that he was hired.
I can only speak for Clemson, but you can bank on Coach Venables' defense not only knowing, but better understanding, the coming play than the 2 stars that the Cock offense trots out.
Along with this winning quote- "not one offense we play will figure this defense out"
Further proof that their fat old baseball coach is still just as lost as an Athletic Director as he was the day that he was hired.
I can only speak for Clemson, but you can bank on Coach Venables' defense not only knowing, but better understanding, the coming play than the 2 stars that the Cock offense trots out.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 1:56 pm to Benjamin Ryan
quote:
allowing their former players to pick the new Head Coach
Yeah, wonder where I’ve seen that before. Seems familiar.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 1:57 pm to Digger
Beamer may or may not be the answer but it's a hell of a lot better than having Muschamp's fat arse roaming the sidelines.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 2:11 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I almost feel sorry for you guys. But the way you acted when you had a taste of success with SOS, you deserve some of this wretched existence you find yourselves squalloring in today
A Georgia fan accusing someone else of being arrogant.
Y'all are sure to be the next big thing. Any minute.
Any.
Minute.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 2:33 pm to Digger
The Athletic had a good article earlier this summer on recruiting in the state of South Carolina. They talked to high school coaches around the state.
Clemson has transitioned to recruiting nationally, and cherry picks the top in-state talent. However, their staff still works hard to maintain relationships in the state.
Clemson started recruiting nationally because of their success. USCe did so in an effort to compete with Clemson and the upper tier of the SEC. Muschamp’s staff did not have good relationships in their own state. As a result, they missed out on several prospects and passed on others that developed into good players.
All the HS coaches they spoke loved Spurrier’s old staff, especially Beamer. Muschamp burned a lot of bridges in state, but it seems Beamer has already rebuilt many of them.
Clemson has transitioned to recruiting nationally, and cherry picks the top in-state talent. However, their staff still works hard to maintain relationships in the state.
Clemson started recruiting nationally because of their success. USCe did so in an effort to compete with Clemson and the upper tier of the SEC. Muschamp’s staff did not have good relationships in their own state. As a result, they missed out on several prospects and passed on others that developed into good players.
All the HS coaches they spoke loved Spurrier’s old staff, especially Beamer. Muschamp burned a lot of bridges in state, but it seems Beamer has already rebuilt many of them.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 2:36 pm to Benjamin Ryan
quote:
SCAR allowing their former players to pick the new Head Coach should tell you all that you need to know about their trajectory.
quote:
Clemson Fan
I know. Hiring a position coach with no prior HC experience is a huge risk!
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 8/11/21 at 3:04 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
I know. Hiring a position coach with no prior HC experience is a huge risk!
Tell the whole story slick:
Dabo took over halfway into 2008 as an interim. That was how long he had to prove his worth. Most coaches get at least 3 years. So that "position coach" had a much shorter leash. He managed a winning record and beating your sorry arse School in the rivalry finale is what gave him an incentive based contract.
SO....If the UofSC had managed to beat Clemson in Dabo's interim year there would be no great run that we fans have enjoyed.
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 8/11/21 at 3:22 pm to Bomont
quote:
Vandy and . .
Tennessee. Maybe Kentucky. Hell maybe Georgia hahaha! You never know
Posted on 8/11/21 at 3:31 pm to Digger
quote:It seems so to me. Let's hope sip hires him after Sark's tenure. He was the "Head Coach in Waiting" behind Mack before going to UF.
Is he just that bad as a head coach?
Posted on 8/11/21 at 3:32 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I think it more likely comes down to Clemson steadily taking every SC recruit they want, and UGA taking what they can as well. USC can no longer rely on in-state recruiting like they used to. USC now needs to recruit nationally, and that's a tough sell with the higher caliber athletes because of the hole you are in now. I almost feel sorry for you guys. But the way you acted when you had a taste of success with SOS, you deserve some of this wretched existence you find yourselves squalloring in today.
Beamer. LOL.
Ican see how you'd think that but you're wrong. Literally since Kirby Smart got to UGA, the only SC player you've beaten us on is Channing Tindall.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 3:53 pm to CU_Tigers4life
Hiring a position coach with no prior HC experience is a huge risk!
This post was edited on 8/11/21 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 8/11/21 at 3:56 pm to Digger
That south Alabama game is going to be pivotal for 3-4 wins for SC.
Posted on 8/11/21 at 3:57 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I think it more likely comes down to Clemson steadily taking every SC recruit they want, and UGA taking what they can as well. USC can no longer rely on in-state recruiting like they used to.
Additionally, the "talent level" in the State of SC has been down the past few years.
I don't know how SC will look post Muschamp, but I do know this, the players SEEM happier and more upbeat....
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News